The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility Pub Date : 2024-10-30 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.5056/jnm23118
Jeong-Yeon Ji, Gene Huh, Eunjeong Ji, Jin Yi Lee, Seung Heon Kang, Wonjae Cha, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung
{"title":"The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Jeong-Yeon Ji, Gene Huh, Eunjeong Ji, Jin Yi Lee, Seung Heon Kang, Wonjae Cha, Woo-Jin Jeong, Young Ho Jung","doi":"10.5056/jnm23118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/aims: </strong>Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a crucial role in managing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the same total PPI dose administered twice daily versus once daily in LPR patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral hospital, enrolling a total of 132 patients aged 19 to 79 with LPR. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10 mg twice daily (BID) or a 20 mg once daily (QD) dose of ilaprazole for 12 weeks. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RSI response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the total RSI score from baseline. We also analyzed the efficacy of the dosing regimens and the impact of dosing and duration on treatment outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The BID group did not display a higher response rate for RSI than the QD group. The changes in total RSI scores at the 8-week and 16- week visits showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total RFS alterations were also comparable between both groups. Each dosing regimen demonstrated significant decreases in RSI and RFS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Both BID and QD PPI dosing regimens improved subjective symptom scores and objective laryngoscopic findings. There was no significant difference in RSI improvement between the 2 dosing regimens, indicating that either dosing regimen could be considered a viable treatment option.</p>","PeriodicalId":16543,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","volume":" ","pages":"459-467"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11474552/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5056/jnm23118","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/aims: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) play a crucial role in managing laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), but the optimal dosing regimen remains unclear. We aim to compare the effectiveness of the same total PPI dose administered twice daily versus once daily in LPR patients.

Methods: We conducted a prospective randomized controlled trial at a tertiary referral hospital, enrolling a total of 132 patients aged 19 to 79 with LPR. These patients were randomly assigned to receive either a 10 mg twice daily (BID) or a 20 mg once daily (QD) dose of ilaprazole for 12 weeks. The Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) and Reflux Finding Score (RFS) were assessed at 8 weeks and 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the RSI response, defined as a reduction of 50% or more in the total RSI score from baseline. We also analyzed the efficacy of the dosing regimens and the impact of dosing and duration on treatment outcomes.

Results: The BID group did not display a higher response rate for RSI than the QD group. The changes in total RSI scores at the 8-week and 16- week visits showed no significant differences between the 2 groups. Total RFS alterations were also comparable between both groups. Each dosing regimen demonstrated significant decreases in RSI and RFS.

Conclusions: Both BID and QD PPI dosing regimens improved subjective symptom scores and objective laryngoscopic findings. There was no significant difference in RSI improvement between the 2 dosing regimens, indicating that either dosing regimen could be considered a viable treatment option.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
每日两次与每日一次质子泵抑制剂给药方案对喉咽反流症状的影响:前瞻性随机对照试验。
背景/目的:质子泵抑制剂(PPI)在治疗喉咽反流(LPR)方面发挥着重要作用,但最佳剂量方案仍不明确。我们的目的是比较每天两次和每天一次相同总剂量的 PPI 对 LPR 患者的疗效:我们在一家三级转诊医院开展了一项前瞻性随机对照试验,共招募了 132 名年龄在 19-79 岁之间的 LPR 患者。这些患者被随机分配接受 10 毫克、每天两次(BID)或 20 毫克、每天一次(QD)剂量的伊拉唑治疗,为期 12 周。分别在 8 周和 16 周时评估反流症状指数 (RSI) 和反流发现评分 (RFS)。主要终点是 RSI 反应,即 RSI 总分比基线降低 50% 或更多。我们还分析了给药方案的疗效以及给药剂量和持续时间对治疗结果的影响:结果:BID组的RSI反应率并不比QD组高。两组在 8 周和 16 周访视时的 RSI 总分变化无显著差异。两组的总 RFS 变化也相当。每种给药方案的 RSI 和 RFS 均有显著下降:结论:PPI BID 和 QD 给药方案均可改善主观症状评分和客观喉镜检查结果。两种给药方案在 RSI 改善方面没有明显差异,这表明任何一种给药方案都可被视为可行的治疗方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility
Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
96
期刊介绍: Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility (J Neurogastroenterol Motil) is a joint official journal of the Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Thai Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society, the Japanese Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, the Indian Motility and Functional Disease Association, the Chinese Society of Gastrointestinal Motility, the South East Asia Gastro-Neuro Motility Association, the Taiwan Neurogastroenterology and Motility Society and the Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association, launched in January 2010 after the title change from the Korean Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, published from 1994 to 2009.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of Abdominal Massage Versus Kinesio Taping in Women With Chronic Constipation: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phrenic Ampulla Emptying Dysfunction in Patients with Esophageal Symptoms. The Impact of a Twice-daily Versus Once-daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Dosing Regimen on Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Symptoms: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial. Additional Diagnostic Yield of the Rapid Drink Challenge in Chicago Classification Version 4.0 Compared With Version 3.0. Clinicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders With Neuromodulators and Psychological Treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1