Disparities in Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) Postpartum Newborn Screening Research Participation.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1007/s40615-024-02123-9
Whitney Wunderlich, Anna Schulte, Mark R Schleiss, Marc Vacquier, Abbey Sidebottom
{"title":"Disparities in Congenital Cytomegalovirus (cCMV) Postpartum Newborn Screening Research Participation.","authors":"Whitney Wunderlich, Anna Schulte, Mark R Schleiss, Marc Vacquier, Abbey Sidebottom","doi":"10.1007/s40615-024-02123-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The objective of this study is to evaluate if racial and other demographic disparities exist between patients who enrolled or declined participation in a congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) newborn universal screening research study.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We examined characteristics for patients approached over a 2-year period to participate in a cCMV newborn screening study. Maternal characteristics included age, race, ethnicity, preferred language, interpreter need, insurance type, and number of living children. Recruitment period was also examined (pre-pandemic January 1 to December 31, 2019, and during COVID-19 July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). Characteristics were compared for patients who enrolled in the study and those who declined participation using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the study sample (n = 4156), 3148 (75.7%) patients enrolled and 1008 (24.3%) declined. Declined participation rates were 47.2% among non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients and 15.7% among NH White patients. In the final adjusted model, NH Black patients (OR 3.14, 95% CI 2.53-3.90), those with public insurance (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.48-2.22), and those with four or more children (OR for 4 + children 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.90) were the most likely to decline research participation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>NH Black and NH multiracial patients were among the most likely patient groups to decline study participation. These groups have previously been identified to be at increased risk for cCMV. This differential participation in cCMV research could result in underreported estimates of prevalence. Future cCMV research, including surveillance studies, should include documentation of differential participation to both address efforts to improve research participation and document and address potential bias in results.</p>","PeriodicalId":16921,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-024-02123-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study is to evaluate if racial and other demographic disparities exist between patients who enrolled or declined participation in a congenital cytomegalovirus (cCMV) newborn universal screening research study.

Methods: We examined characteristics for patients approached over a 2-year period to participate in a cCMV newborn screening study. Maternal characteristics included age, race, ethnicity, preferred language, interpreter need, insurance type, and number of living children. Recruitment period was also examined (pre-pandemic January 1 to December 31, 2019, and during COVID-19 July 1, 2021 to June 30, 2022). Characteristics were compared for patients who enrolled in the study and those who declined participation using descriptive statistics and logistic regression.

Results: Of the study sample (n = 4156), 3148 (75.7%) patients enrolled and 1008 (24.3%) declined. Declined participation rates were 47.2% among non-Hispanic (NH) Black patients and 15.7% among NH White patients. In the final adjusted model, NH Black patients (OR 3.14, 95% CI 2.53-3.90), those with public insurance (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.48-2.22), and those with four or more children (OR for 4 + children 1.45, 95% CI 1.11-1.90) were the most likely to decline research participation.

Conclusions: NH Black and NH multiracial patients were among the most likely patient groups to decline study participation. These groups have previously been identified to be at increased risk for cCMV. This differential participation in cCMV research could result in underreported estimates of prevalence. Future cCMV research, including surveillance studies, should include documentation of differential participation to both address efforts to improve research participation and document and address potential bias in results.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
先天性巨细胞病毒 (cCMV) 产后新生儿筛查研究参与方面的差异。
研究目的本研究旨在评估参加或拒绝参加先天性巨细胞病毒(cCMV)新生儿普遍筛查研究的患者之间是否存在种族和其他人口统计学差异:我们调查了两年内被邀请参加 cCMV 新生儿筛查研究的患者特征。母亲特征包括年龄、种族、民族、首选语言、翻译需求、保险类型和在世子女数量。同时还考察了招募时间(大流行前的 2019 年 1 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日,以及 COVID-19 期间的 2021 年 7 月 1 日至 2022 年 6 月 30 日)。利用描述性统计和逻辑回归比较了参加研究和拒绝参加研究的患者的特征:在研究样本(n = 4156)中,3148 名患者(75.7%)加入了研究,1008 名患者(24.3%)拒绝参与。非西班牙裔(NH)黑人患者的放弃参与率为 47.2%,NH 白人患者的放弃参与率为 15.7%。在最终调整模型中,北荷兰黑人患者(OR 3.14,95% CI 2.53-3.90)、有公共保险的患者(OR 1.81,95% CI 1.48-2.22)和有四个或四个以上子女的患者(4 + 子女的OR 1.45,95% CI 1.11-1.90)最有可能拒绝参与研究:结论:新罕布什尔州黑人和新罕布什尔州多种族患者是最有可能拒绝参与研究的患者群体。结论:新罕布什尔州黑人和新罕布什尔州多种族患者是最有可能拒绝参与研究的患者群体。在参与 cCMV 研究方面的这种差异可能会导致对流行率的估计不足。未来的 cCMV 研究(包括监测研究)应包括对不同参与情况的记录,以便努力提高研究参与度,并记录和解决研究结果中可能存在的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities
Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
5.10%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities reports on the scholarly progress of work to understand, address, and ultimately eliminate health disparities based on race and ethnicity. Efforts to explore underlying causes of health disparities and to describe interventions that have been undertaken to address racial and ethnic health disparities are featured. Promising studies that are ongoing or studies that have longer term data are welcome, as are studies that serve as lessons for best practices in eliminating health disparities. Original research, systematic reviews, and commentaries presenting the state-of-the-art thinking on problems centered on health disparities will be considered for publication. We particularly encourage review articles that generate innovative and testable ideas, and constructive discussions and/or critiques of health disparities.Because the Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities receives a large number of submissions, about 30% of submissions to the Journal are sent out for full peer review.
期刊最新文献
A Mixed Methods Analysis of Long COVID Symptoms in Black Americans: Examining Physical and Mental Health Outcomes. Racial and Ethnic Disparities and the National Burden of COVID-19 on Inpatient Hospitalizations: A Retrospective Study in the United States in the Year 2020. Unveiling Disparities: Analyzing Hispanic Inclusion in Liver Cancer Research Databases in the United States. Correction to: Multilevel Resilience and HIV Virologic Suppression Among African American/Black Adults in the Southeastern United States. The Association Between Vitamin D Deficiency and Diabetes in Adult African Americans and Whites: An NHANES Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1