Measurement invariance of the Facebook intrusion questionnaire across 25 countries

IF 3.3 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Psychology Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1002/ijop.13227
Agata Błachnio, Aneta Przepiórka, Oleg Gorbaniuk, Ana Maria Abreu, Rebecca Bendayan, Menachem Ben-Ezra, Martina Benvenuti, Mithat Durak, Emre Senol-Durak, Meiko Makita, Monika McNeill, Gwendolyn Seidman, Anise M.S. Wu, Maria J. Blanca, Alan Angeluci, Nenad Čuš Babić, Tihana Brkljacic, Adela Magdalena Ciobanu, Ana Ivanova, Michail N. Giannakos, Julia Gorbaniuk, Juraj Holdoš, Sadia Malik, Ali Bassam Mahmoud, Anita Milanovic, Bojan Musil, Ilias O. Pappas, Camelia Popa, Igor Pantic, Belen Rando, Lancy D'Souza, Mariusz Wołonciej, Mariek M. P. Vanden Abeele, Eiad Yafi, Shu M. Yu, Rachel A. Elphinston, Elvis Mazzoni
{"title":"Measurement invariance of the Facebook intrusion questionnaire across 25 countries","authors":"Agata Błachnio,&nbsp;Aneta Przepiórka,&nbsp;Oleg Gorbaniuk,&nbsp;Ana Maria Abreu,&nbsp;Rebecca Bendayan,&nbsp;Menachem Ben-Ezra,&nbsp;Martina Benvenuti,&nbsp;Mithat Durak,&nbsp;Emre Senol-Durak,&nbsp;Meiko Makita,&nbsp;Monika McNeill,&nbsp;Gwendolyn Seidman,&nbsp;Anise M.S. Wu,&nbsp;Maria J. Blanca,&nbsp;Alan Angeluci,&nbsp;Nenad Čuš Babić,&nbsp;Tihana Brkljacic,&nbsp;Adela Magdalena Ciobanu,&nbsp;Ana Ivanova,&nbsp;Michail N. Giannakos,&nbsp;Julia Gorbaniuk,&nbsp;Juraj Holdoš,&nbsp;Sadia Malik,&nbsp;Ali Bassam Mahmoud,&nbsp;Anita Milanovic,&nbsp;Bojan Musil,&nbsp;Ilias O. Pappas,&nbsp;Camelia Popa,&nbsp;Igor Pantic,&nbsp;Belen Rando,&nbsp;Lancy D'Souza,&nbsp;Mariusz Wołonciej,&nbsp;Mariek M. P. Vanden Abeele,&nbsp;Eiad Yafi,&nbsp;Shu M. Yu,&nbsp;Rachel A. Elphinston,&nbsp;Elvis Mazzoni","doi":"10.1002/ijop.13227","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Facebook is one of the most popular social networking sites. However, Facebook intrusion or addiction is a growing concern as it involves an excessive attachment to Facebook, which disrupts daily functioning. To date, few studies have examined whether cross-cultural differences in the measurement of Facebook addiction exist. The aim of this study was to investigate the cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance of the Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire (FIQ), one of the most widely used measures of Facebook addiction, across 25 countries (<i>N</i> = 12,204, 62.3% female; mean age = 25 years). Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) assessed cross-cultural validity as well as invariance. Additionally, individual confirmatory factor analyses evaluated the factorial structure and measurement invariance across genders in each country. The FIQ demonstrated partial metric invariance across countries and metric (13 countries), scalar (11 countries) or residual (10 countries) invariance across genders within individual countries. A one-factor model indicated a good fit in 18 countries. Cronbach's alpha for the entire sample was .85. Our findings suggest that the FIQ may provide an adequate assessment of Facebook addiction that is psychometrically equivalent across cultures. Moreover, the questionnaire seems to be universal and suitable for studying different social media in distinct cultural environments. Consequently, this robust tool can be used to explore behaviours related to specific media that are particularly popular in any given country.</p>","PeriodicalId":48146,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Psychology","volume":"59 6","pages":"1049-1063"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ijop.13227","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Facebook is one of the most popular social networking sites. However, Facebook intrusion or addiction is a growing concern as it involves an excessive attachment to Facebook, which disrupts daily functioning. To date, few studies have examined whether cross-cultural differences in the measurement of Facebook addiction exist. The aim of this study was to investigate the cross-cultural validity and measurement invariance of the Facebook Intrusion Questionnaire (FIQ), one of the most widely used measures of Facebook addiction, across 25 countries (N = 12,204, 62.3% female; mean age = 25 years). Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses (MGCFA) assessed cross-cultural validity as well as invariance. Additionally, individual confirmatory factor analyses evaluated the factorial structure and measurement invariance across genders in each country. The FIQ demonstrated partial metric invariance across countries and metric (13 countries), scalar (11 countries) or residual (10 countries) invariance across genders within individual countries. A one-factor model indicated a good fit in 18 countries. Cronbach's alpha for the entire sample was .85. Our findings suggest that the FIQ may provide an adequate assessment of Facebook addiction that is psychometrically equivalent across cultures. Moreover, the questionnaire seems to be universal and suitable for studying different social media in distinct cultural environments. Consequently, this robust tool can be used to explore behaviours related to specific media that are particularly popular in any given country.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Facebook 入侵问卷在 25 个国家的测量不变性。
Facebook 是最受欢迎的社交网站之一。然而,Facebook 入侵或成瘾问题日益受到关注,因为它涉及到对 Facebook 的过度依赖,从而扰乱了日常工作。迄今为止,很少有研究探讨在测量 Facebook 上瘾时是否存在跨文化差异。本研究的目的是调查 Facebook 入侵问卷(FIQ)的跨文化有效性和测量不变性,该问卷是最广泛使用的 Facebook成瘾测量方法之一,适用于 25 个国家(样本数 = 12204,62.3% 为女性;平均年龄 = 25 岁)。多组确认性因子分析(MGCFA)评估了跨文化有效性和不变性。此外,个体确认性因素分析还评估了每个国家不同性别间的因子结构和测量不变性。FIQ 在各国之间表现出部分度量不变性,在各国内部表现出度量(13 个国家)、标度(11 个国家)或残差(10 个国家)的性别不变性。单因素模型在 18 个国家显示出良好的拟合性。整个样本的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.85。我们的研究结果表明,FIQ 可以对 Facebook 上瘾进行适当的评估,而且在不同文化背景下具有心理等效性。此外,该问卷似乎具有通用性,适用于研究不同文化环境中的不同社交媒体。因此,这一强大的工具可用于探究与特定国家特别流行的特定媒体相关的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Psychology
International Journal of Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Psychology (IJP) is the journal of the International Union of Psychological Science (IUPsyS) and is published under the auspices of the Union. IJP seeks to support the IUPsyS in fostering the development of international psychological science. It aims to strengthen the dialog within psychology around the world and to facilitate communication among different areas of psychology and among psychologists from different cultural backgrounds. IJP is the outlet for empirical basic and applied studies and for reviews that either (a) incorporate perspectives from different areas or domains within psychology or across different disciplines, (b) test the culture-dependent validity of psychological theories, or (c) integrate literature from different regions in the world.
期刊最新文献
Impact of French lockdowns on bereavement experiences: Insight from ALCESTE analysis revealing psychological resilience and distinct grief dynamics amidst COVID-19. Virtual motivational interviewing for physical activity among older adults: A non-randomised, mixed-methods feasibility study. Dimensionality in confirmatory factor analysis is not in the eye of the beholder: Ancillary bifactor statistical indices illuminate dimensionality and reliability. Getting started with the graded response model: An introduction and tutorial in R. Profiles of intergenerational and digital solidarity between middle-aged parents and young adult children during the COVID-19 pandemic: Associations with parents' psychological well-being.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1