Oral resveratrol in adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial (ARTHROL).

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-13 eCollection Date: 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004440
Christelle Nguyen, Emmanuel Coudeyre, Isabelle Boutron, Gabriel Baron, Camille Daste, Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau, Jérémie Sellam, Jennifer Zauderer, Francis Berenbaum, François Rannou
{"title":"Oral resveratrol in adults with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial (ARTHROL).","authors":"Christelle Nguyen, Emmanuel Coudeyre, Isabelle Boutron, Gabriel Baron, Camille Daste, Marie-Martine Lefèvre-Colau, Jérémie Sellam, Jennifer Zauderer, Francis Berenbaum, François Rannou","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004440","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Resveratrol is a natural compound found in red wine. It has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties in preclinical models. We compared the effect of oral resveratrol in a new patented formulation to oral placebo for individuals with painful knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>ARTHROL was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial conducted in 3 tertiary care centers in France. We recruited adults who fulfilled the 1986 American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee osteoarthritis and reported a pain intensity score of at least 40 on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) in 10-point increments (0, no pain, to 100, maximal pain). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by using a computer-generated randomization list with permuted blocks of variable size (2, 4, or 6) to receive oral resveratrol (40 mg [2 caplets] twice a day for 1 week, then 20 mg [1 caplet] twice a day; resveratrol group) or matched oral placebo (placebo group) for 6 months. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in knee pain on a self-administered 11-point pain NRS at 3 months. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: (NCT02905799). Between October 20, 2017 and November 8, 2021, we assessed 649 individuals for eligibility, and from November 9, 2017, we recruited 142 (22%) participants (mean age 61.4 years [standard deviation (SD) 9.6] and 101 [71%] women); 71 (50%) were randomly assigned to the resveratrol group and 71 (50%) to the placebo group. At baseline, the mean knee pain score was 56.2/100 (SD 13.5). At 3 months, the mean reduction in knee pain was -15.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), -21.1 to -10.3) in the resveratrol group and -15.2 (95% CI, -20.5 to -9.8) in the placebo group (absolute difference -0.6 [95% CI, -8.0 to 6.9]; p = 0.88). Serious adverse events (not related to the interventions) occurred in 3 (4%) in the resveratrol group and 2 (3%) in the placebo group. Our study has limitations in that it was underpowered and the effect size, estimated to be 0.55, was optimistically estimated.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, we observed that compared with placebo, oral resveratrol did not reduce knee pain in people with painful knee osteoarthritis.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02905799.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"21 8","pages":"e1004440"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11321588/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004440","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Resveratrol is a natural compound found in red wine. It has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties in preclinical models. We compared the effect of oral resveratrol in a new patented formulation to oral placebo for individuals with painful knee osteoarthritis.

Methods and findings: ARTHROL was a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, Phase 3 trial conducted in 3 tertiary care centers in France. We recruited adults who fulfilled the 1986 American College of Rheumatology criteria for knee osteoarthritis and reported a pain intensity score of at least 40 on an 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS) in 10-point increments (0, no pain, to 100, maximal pain). Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) by using a computer-generated randomization list with permuted blocks of variable size (2, 4, or 6) to receive oral resveratrol (40 mg [2 caplets] twice a day for 1 week, then 20 mg [1 caplet] twice a day; resveratrol group) or matched oral placebo (placebo group) for 6 months. The primary outcome was the mean change from baseline in knee pain on a self-administered 11-point pain NRS at 3 months. The trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: (NCT02905799). Between October 20, 2017 and November 8, 2021, we assessed 649 individuals for eligibility, and from November 9, 2017, we recruited 142 (22%) participants (mean age 61.4 years [standard deviation (SD) 9.6] and 101 [71%] women); 71 (50%) were randomly assigned to the resveratrol group and 71 (50%) to the placebo group. At baseline, the mean knee pain score was 56.2/100 (SD 13.5). At 3 months, the mean reduction in knee pain was -15.7 (95% confidence interval (CI), -21.1 to -10.3) in the resveratrol group and -15.2 (95% CI, -20.5 to -9.8) in the placebo group (absolute difference -0.6 [95% CI, -8.0 to 6.9]; p = 0.88). Serious adverse events (not related to the interventions) occurred in 3 (4%) in the resveratrol group and 2 (3%) in the placebo group. Our study has limitations in that it was underpowered and the effect size, estimated to be 0.55, was optimistically estimated.

Conclusions: In this study, we observed that compared with placebo, oral resveratrol did not reduce knee pain in people with painful knee osteoarthritis.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT02905799.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
口服白藜芦醇治疗成人膝关节骨关节炎:随机安慰剂对照试验(ARTHROL)。
背景介绍白藜芦醇是一种存在于红葡萄酒中的天然化合物。它在临床前模型中已被证明具有抗炎特性。我们比较了口服白藜芦醇新专利配方与口服安慰剂对膝关节骨关节炎疼痛患者的效果:ARTHROL是一项双盲、随机、安慰剂对照的3期试验,在法国的3个三级医疗中心进行。我们招募了符合1986年美国风湿病学会膝关节骨性关节炎标准的成年人,他们在11点数字评分量表(NRS)上的疼痛强度至少为40分,以10点为增量(0表示无疼痛,100表示最大疼痛)。研究人员通过计算机生成的随机分配表(1:1),将参与者随机分配到口服白藜芦醇(40 毫克[2 粒],每天 2 次,持续 1 周,然后 20 毫克[1 粒],每天 2 次;白藜芦醇组)或匹配的口服安慰剂(安慰剂组),为期 6 个月。主要结果是3个月时自测的11点疼痛NRS与基线相比膝关节疼痛的平均变化。该试验已在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册:(NCT02905799)。2017年10月20日至2021年11月8日期间,我们对649人进行了资格评估,从2017年11月9日起,我们招募了142名(22%)参与者(平均年龄61.4岁[标准差(SD)9.6],女性101人[71%]);71人(50%)被随机分配到白藜芦醇组,71人(50%)被随机分配到安慰剂组。基线时,膝关节疼痛的平均评分为 56.2/100(标准差 13.5)。3 个月后,白藜芦醇组膝关节疼痛的平均减轻幅度为-15.7(95% 置信区间 (CI),-21.1 至 -10.3),安慰剂组为-15.2(95% CI,-20.5 至 -9.8)(绝对差异为-0.6 [95% CI,-8.0 至 6.9];P = 0.88)。白藜芦醇组有 3 例(4%)发生严重不良事件,安慰剂组有 2 例(3%)发生严重不良事件(与干预措施无关)。我们的研究存在局限性,即研究力量不足,而且效应大小(估计为0.55)是乐观估计的:在这项研究中,我们发现与安慰剂相比,口服白藜芦醇并不能减轻膝关节骨性关节炎患者的膝关节疼痛:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID:试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov ID:NCT02905799。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
期刊最新文献
The critical need for a robust research agenda on ultra-processed food consumption and cancer risk. The NOVA system can be used to address harmful foods and harmful food systems. Identification and outcomes of acute kidney disease in patients presenting in Bolivia, Brazil, South Africa, and Nepal. The association of bearing surface materials with the risk of revision following primary total hip replacement: A cohort analysis of 1,026,481 hip replacements from the National Joint Registry. Impact of active case finding for tuberculosis with mass chest X-ray screening in Glasgow, Scotland, 1950-1963: An epidemiological analysis of historical data.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1