Product reformulation in non-alcoholic beverages and foods after the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels in Mexico.

IF 15.8 1区 医学 Q1 Medicine PLoS Medicine Pub Date : 2025-03-18 eCollection Date: 2025-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.1004533
Juan Carlos Salgado, Lilia S Pedraza, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Tania C Aburto, Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo, Simon Barquera
{"title":"Product reformulation in non-alcoholic beverages and foods after the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels in Mexico.","authors":"Juan Carlos Salgado, Lilia S Pedraza, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Tania C Aburto, Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo, Simon Barquera","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In late March 2020, the Mexican government announced an updated norm to include front-of-pack warning labels for packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Warning labels came into effect in October 2020. To avoid displaying warning labels, producers can reformulate their products by reducing the content of calories or critical nutrients targeted by the policy (added sugars, saturated fat, and sodium) or removing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine. The objective of this study is to assess changes in the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs for calories and critical nutrients and changes in the content of calories and critical nutrients associated with warning labels in Mexico.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We used nutritional panel data collected by the Mexican National Institute of Public Health from ≈1,000 top-purchased products, which represented ≥60% of the market share for each of the included food groups according to household purchases in the Nielsen Consumer Panel commercial dataset for Mexico in 2016. Nutritional panel data is available for three periods: 2016-2017, T0 (pre-policy); Jul-Sep 2020, T1 (post-warning-label announcement); and Feb-Apr 2021, T2 (post-warning-label implementation). We assessed changes in T1 versus T0 (potential anticipatory reformulation before the warning-label implementation) and T2 versus T0 (reformulation after the warning-label implementation) by food group using generalized estimating equations for the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs or containing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine, and fixed-effects linear models and quantile regressions for the content of calories and critical nutrients. Included food groups were cereal-based desserts, bread and other cereals, salty snacks, sweetened beverages, solid dairy, liquid dairy, instant food, and candies. At T0, the food group level with the lowest percentage of products with at least one calorie/nutrient content above warning-label cutoffs was instant food (77.8%); at T2, this fell to 52.6%. Based on our statistical models, we found that all food groups showed reductions in at least one type of warning label. The most common reductions in the percentage of products exceeding warning-label cutoffs were for sodium (up to -63.1 percentage points for bread and other cereals; 95% CI: -77.5, -48.6; p-value < 0.001), saturated fat (up to -26.3 percentage points for salty snacks; 95% CI: -35.8, -16.8; p-value < 0.001), and products containing non-caloric sweeteners (up to -29.0 percentage points for solid dairy; 95% CI: -40.7, -17.2; p-value < 0.001). The reductions in products above warning-label cutoffs were coupled with reductions in products' content of calories and critical nutrients. According to quantile regressions, these reductions mostly occurred at the 50th-75th percentiles. Product reformulation mainly occurred in T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show product reformulation due to reductions in critical nutrients/calories after the warning-label policy implementation, which entails improving the nutritional profile of the packaged food and beverage supply in Mexico.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 3","pages":"e1004533"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004533","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In late March 2020, the Mexican government announced an updated norm to include front-of-pack warning labels for packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Warning labels came into effect in October 2020. To avoid displaying warning labels, producers can reformulate their products by reducing the content of calories or critical nutrients targeted by the policy (added sugars, saturated fat, and sodium) or removing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine. The objective of this study is to assess changes in the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs for calories and critical nutrients and changes in the content of calories and critical nutrients associated with warning labels in Mexico.

Methods and findings: We used nutritional panel data collected by the Mexican National Institute of Public Health from ≈1,000 top-purchased products, which represented ≥60% of the market share for each of the included food groups according to household purchases in the Nielsen Consumer Panel commercial dataset for Mexico in 2016. Nutritional panel data is available for three periods: 2016-2017, T0 (pre-policy); Jul-Sep 2020, T1 (post-warning-label announcement); and Feb-Apr 2021, T2 (post-warning-label implementation). We assessed changes in T1 versus T0 (potential anticipatory reformulation before the warning-label implementation) and T2 versus T0 (reformulation after the warning-label implementation) by food group using generalized estimating equations for the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs or containing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine, and fixed-effects linear models and quantile regressions for the content of calories and critical nutrients. Included food groups were cereal-based desserts, bread and other cereals, salty snacks, sweetened beverages, solid dairy, liquid dairy, instant food, and candies. At T0, the food group level with the lowest percentage of products with at least one calorie/nutrient content above warning-label cutoffs was instant food (77.8%); at T2, this fell to 52.6%. Based on our statistical models, we found that all food groups showed reductions in at least one type of warning label. The most common reductions in the percentage of products exceeding warning-label cutoffs were for sodium (up to -63.1 percentage points for bread and other cereals; 95% CI: -77.5, -48.6; p-value < 0.001), saturated fat (up to -26.3 percentage points for salty snacks; 95% CI: -35.8, -16.8; p-value < 0.001), and products containing non-caloric sweeteners (up to -29.0 percentage points for solid dairy; 95% CI: -40.7, -17.2; p-value < 0.001). The reductions in products above warning-label cutoffs were coupled with reductions in products' content of calories and critical nutrients. According to quantile regressions, these reductions mostly occurred at the 50th-75th percentiles. Product reformulation mainly occurred in T2.

Conclusion: Our findings show product reformulation due to reductions in critical nutrients/calories after the warning-label policy implementation, which entails improving the nutritional profile of the packaged food and beverage supply in Mexico.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PLoS Medicine
PLoS Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
17.60
自引率
0.60%
发文量
227
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings. The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination. PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.
期刊最新文献
Product reformulation in non-alcoholic beverages and foods after the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels in Mexico. Direct and indirect impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life expectancy and person-years of life lost with and without disability: A systematic analysis for 18 European countries, 2020-2022. Effects of a community-driven water, sanitation, and hygiene intervention on diarrhea, child growth, and local institutions: A cluster-randomized controlled trial in rural Democratic Republic of Congo. Submicroscopic malaria in pregnancy and associated adverse pregnancy events: A case-cohort study of 4,352 women on the Thailand-Myanmar border. Polygenic risk scores for pan-cancer risk prediction in the Chinese population: A population-based cohort study based on the China Kadoorie Biobank.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1