Juan Carlos Salgado, Lilia S Pedraza, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Tania C Aburto, Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo, Simon Barquera
{"title":"Product reformulation in non-alcoholic beverages and foods after the implementation of front-of-pack warning labels in Mexico.","authors":"Juan Carlos Salgado, Lilia S Pedraza, Alejandra Contreras-Manzano, Tania C Aburto, Lizbeth Tolentino-Mayo, Simon Barquera","doi":"10.1371/journal.pmed.1004533","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In late March 2020, the Mexican government announced an updated norm to include front-of-pack warning labels for packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Warning labels came into effect in October 2020. To avoid displaying warning labels, producers can reformulate their products by reducing the content of calories or critical nutrients targeted by the policy (added sugars, saturated fat, and sodium) or removing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine. The objective of this study is to assess changes in the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs for calories and critical nutrients and changes in the content of calories and critical nutrients associated with warning labels in Mexico.</p><p><strong>Methods and findings: </strong>We used nutritional panel data collected by the Mexican National Institute of Public Health from ≈1,000 top-purchased products, which represented ≥60% of the market share for each of the included food groups according to household purchases in the Nielsen Consumer Panel commercial dataset for Mexico in 2016. Nutritional panel data is available for three periods: 2016-2017, T0 (pre-policy); Jul-Sep 2020, T1 (post-warning-label announcement); and Feb-Apr 2021, T2 (post-warning-label implementation). We assessed changes in T1 versus T0 (potential anticipatory reformulation before the warning-label implementation) and T2 versus T0 (reformulation after the warning-label implementation) by food group using generalized estimating equations for the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs or containing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine, and fixed-effects linear models and quantile regressions for the content of calories and critical nutrients. Included food groups were cereal-based desserts, bread and other cereals, salty snacks, sweetened beverages, solid dairy, liquid dairy, instant food, and candies. At T0, the food group level with the lowest percentage of products with at least one calorie/nutrient content above warning-label cutoffs was instant food (77.8%); at T2, this fell to 52.6%. Based on our statistical models, we found that all food groups showed reductions in at least one type of warning label. The most common reductions in the percentage of products exceeding warning-label cutoffs were for sodium (up to -63.1 percentage points for bread and other cereals; 95% CI: -77.5, -48.6; p-value < 0.001), saturated fat (up to -26.3 percentage points for salty snacks; 95% CI: -35.8, -16.8; p-value < 0.001), and products containing non-caloric sweeteners (up to -29.0 percentage points for solid dairy; 95% CI: -40.7, -17.2; p-value < 0.001). The reductions in products above warning-label cutoffs were coupled with reductions in products' content of calories and critical nutrients. According to quantile regressions, these reductions mostly occurred at the 50th-75th percentiles. Product reformulation mainly occurred in T2.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings show product reformulation due to reductions in critical nutrients/calories after the warning-label policy implementation, which entails improving the nutritional profile of the packaged food and beverage supply in Mexico.</p>","PeriodicalId":49008,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Medicine","volume":"22 3","pages":"e1004533"},"PeriodicalIF":15.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11918434/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1004533","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: In late March 2020, the Mexican government announced an updated norm to include front-of-pack warning labels for packaged foods and non-alcoholic beverages. Warning labels came into effect in October 2020. To avoid displaying warning labels, producers can reformulate their products by reducing the content of calories or critical nutrients targeted by the policy (added sugars, saturated fat, and sodium) or removing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine. The objective of this study is to assess changes in the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs for calories and critical nutrients and changes in the content of calories and critical nutrients associated with warning labels in Mexico.
Methods and findings: We used nutritional panel data collected by the Mexican National Institute of Public Health from ≈1,000 top-purchased products, which represented ≥60% of the market share for each of the included food groups according to household purchases in the Nielsen Consumer Panel commercial dataset for Mexico in 2016. Nutritional panel data is available for three periods: 2016-2017, T0 (pre-policy); Jul-Sep 2020, T1 (post-warning-label announcement); and Feb-Apr 2021, T2 (post-warning-label implementation). We assessed changes in T1 versus T0 (potential anticipatory reformulation before the warning-label implementation) and T2 versus T0 (reformulation after the warning-label implementation) by food group using generalized estimating equations for the percentage of products above warning-label cutoffs or containing non-caloric sweeteners or added caffeine, and fixed-effects linear models and quantile regressions for the content of calories and critical nutrients. Included food groups were cereal-based desserts, bread and other cereals, salty snacks, sweetened beverages, solid dairy, liquid dairy, instant food, and candies. At T0, the food group level with the lowest percentage of products with at least one calorie/nutrient content above warning-label cutoffs was instant food (77.8%); at T2, this fell to 52.6%. Based on our statistical models, we found that all food groups showed reductions in at least one type of warning label. The most common reductions in the percentage of products exceeding warning-label cutoffs were for sodium (up to -63.1 percentage points for bread and other cereals; 95% CI: -77.5, -48.6; p-value < 0.001), saturated fat (up to -26.3 percentage points for salty snacks; 95% CI: -35.8, -16.8; p-value < 0.001), and products containing non-caloric sweeteners (up to -29.0 percentage points for solid dairy; 95% CI: -40.7, -17.2; p-value < 0.001). The reductions in products above warning-label cutoffs were coupled with reductions in products' content of calories and critical nutrients. According to quantile regressions, these reductions mostly occurred at the 50th-75th percentiles. Product reformulation mainly occurred in T2.
Conclusion: Our findings show product reformulation due to reductions in critical nutrients/calories after the warning-label policy implementation, which entails improving the nutritional profile of the packaged food and beverage supply in Mexico.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Medicine is a prominent platform for discussing and researching global health challenges. The journal covers a wide range of topics, including biomedical, environmental, social, and political factors affecting health. It prioritizes articles that contribute to clinical practice, health policy, or a better understanding of pathophysiology, ultimately aiming to improve health outcomes across different settings.
The journal is unwavering in its commitment to uphold the highest ethical standards in medical publishing. This includes actively managing and disclosing any conflicts of interest related to reporting, reviewing, and publishing. PLOS Medicine promotes transparency in the entire review and publication process. The journal also encourages data sharing and encourages the reuse of published work. Additionally, authors retain copyright for their work, and the publication is made accessible through Open Access with no restrictions on availability and dissemination.
PLOS Medicine takes measures to avoid conflicts of interest associated with advertising drugs and medical devices or engaging in the exclusive sale of reprints.