Toward More Equitable Care: A Closer Look at Autism Clinic Intake Practices and Paperwork.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/DBP.0000000000001312
Anisha P Srinivasan, Erika Phelps Nishiguchi, Cassandra Gonzalez, Manuel E Jimenez, Katharine E Zuckerman, Katherine C Lion
{"title":"Toward More Equitable Care: A Closer Look at Autism Clinic Intake Practices and Paperwork.","authors":"Anisha P Srinivasan, Erika Phelps Nishiguchi, Cassandra Gonzalez, Manuel E Jimenez, Katharine E Zuckerman, Katherine C Lion","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe intake requirements among autism clinics and to assess how well intake paperwork aligns with national standards for enhancing language and literacy accessibility.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a survey of 126 autism clinics in the Children's Hospital Association, assessing intake processes and intake paperwork readability conducted between November 2021 and August 2022. Descriptive analyses characterized intake requirements and paperwork components. Free-text responses about intake support strategies were categorized into themes. Logistic regression models examined associations between clinic patient demographics and odds of requiring intake paperwork. Intake packet length, content, and reading grade level were examined.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the invited clinics, 73% completed the survey. Among the participating clinics, 55% required intake paperwork before scheduling appointments, 34% offered English forms only, and 89% had no plain language forms. Clinic patient demographics were not associated with intake paperwork requirements. Analyzed intake packets (n = 67) averaged 11 pages long, and most were written above the fifth-grade reading level. Most packets solicited medical, developmental, and educational/therapy history. Many also requested psychoeducational evaluations and teacher rating forms. Reported intake support strategies for families with language or literacy needs included making ad hoc exceptions to the usual process, task shifting to outside organizations, providing support at family's request, and delegating to support staff.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Many autism clinics nationwide require intake paperwork before diagnostic evaluation. Many clinics offer intake paperwork in English only, and paperwork often does not meet health literacy standards. Reducing paperwork requirements and providing more routine and robust intake support may facilitate equitable access to autism diagnostic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe intake requirements among autism clinics and to assess how well intake paperwork aligns with national standards for enhancing language and literacy accessibility.

Methods: This was a survey of 126 autism clinics in the Children's Hospital Association, assessing intake processes and intake paperwork readability conducted between November 2021 and August 2022. Descriptive analyses characterized intake requirements and paperwork components. Free-text responses about intake support strategies were categorized into themes. Logistic regression models examined associations between clinic patient demographics and odds of requiring intake paperwork. Intake packet length, content, and reading grade level were examined.

Results: Of the invited clinics, 73% completed the survey. Among the participating clinics, 55% required intake paperwork before scheduling appointments, 34% offered English forms only, and 89% had no plain language forms. Clinic patient demographics were not associated with intake paperwork requirements. Analyzed intake packets (n = 67) averaged 11 pages long, and most were written above the fifth-grade reading level. Most packets solicited medical, developmental, and educational/therapy history. Many also requested psychoeducational evaluations and teacher rating forms. Reported intake support strategies for families with language or literacy needs included making ad hoc exceptions to the usual process, task shifting to outside organizations, providing support at family's request, and delegating to support staff.

Conclusion: Many autism clinics nationwide require intake paperwork before diagnostic evaluation. Many clinics offer intake paperwork in English only, and paperwork often does not meet health literacy standards. Reducing paperwork requirements and providing more routine and robust intake support may facilitate equitable access to autism diagnostic evaluations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现更公平的护理:自闭症诊所接诊做法和文书工作管窥》。
目的描述自闭症诊所的接诊要求,并评估接诊文书工作在提高语言和识字可读性方面与国家标准的一致性:这是在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 8 月期间对儿童医院协会的 126 家自闭症诊所进行的一项调查,旨在评估接诊流程和接诊文书的可读性。描述性分析描述了入院要求和文书工作的特点。有关入院支持策略的自由文本回复被归类为主题。逻辑回归模型检验了诊所患者人口统计学特征与需要接诊文书工作几率之间的关联。研究还考察了入院资料包的长度、内容和阅读水平:受邀诊所中有 73% 完成了调查。在参与调查的诊所中,55% 的诊所在安排预约前要求提供接诊文件,34% 的诊所只提供英文表格,89% 的诊所没有纯语言表格。诊所患者的人口统计学特征与接诊文件要求无关。经分析的接诊文件包(n = 67)平均长度为 11 页,大多数文件包的书写水平高于五年级的阅读水平。大多数文件包要求提供病史、发育史和教育/治疗史。许多还要求提供心理教育评估和教师评分表。据报告,为有语言或读写能力需求的家庭提供的入院支持策略包括:对常规流程进行特别例外处理、将任务转移给外部机构、应家庭要求提供支持,以及将任务委托给支持人员:全国许多自闭症诊所都要求在诊断评估前进行入院文书工作。许多诊所只提供英文版的接诊文书,而且文书工作往往不符合健康素养标准。减少文书工作要求,提供更常规、更有力的入院支持,可促进自闭症诊断评估的公平性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
期刊最新文献
Nocebo Effect on Pain Perception and Attention with Children With and Without Attention Deficit And/Or Hyperactivity Disorder. Associations Between Sleep Health and Child Behavior at Age 6 Years in the INSIGHT Study. Teletherapy and Medication Management of Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder with Co-occurring Internalizing Symptoms and Suicidality During the Pandemic. Boosting Autism Screening and Referrals with EHR-Integrated Tools at Well-Child Visits. Challenging Case: Family Navigation for Autism Spectrum Disorder.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1