Evaluation of treatment information quality on hypertension and diabetes on WeChat and TikTok: A cross-sectional content analysis.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1177/14604582241275824
Minxia Wu, Yongmei Yang, Yanxing Chen
{"title":"Evaluation of treatment information quality on hypertension and diabetes on WeChat and TikTok: A cross-sectional content analysis.","authors":"Minxia Wu, Yongmei Yang, Yanxing Chen","doi":"10.1177/14604582241275824","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This study aimed to assess the quality of the information in WeChat and TikTok videos related to hypertension and diabetes treatment. <b>Methods:</b> A sample of 120 Chinese videos was collected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality was evaluated using DISCERN, JAMA and the latest edition of Chinese guidelines for hypertension and diabetes prevention and treatment, and two observers independently scored each video using the three assessment tools. <b>Results:</b> Among all 120 videos, only 10 scored above 38 points in DISCERN, with 45 videos rated as \"very poor\". None of the video met all JAMA criteria simultaneously, and there were gaps in accuracy and completeness compared to the two guidelines. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between information quality and the number of likes and comments. <b>Conclusion:</b> The current quality of information on the treatment of hypertension and diabetes on WeChat and TikTok was unsatisfactory. Consequently, the government should strengthen oversight of information quality, and social media platforms should actively review health-related content to prevent inaccurate information dissemination. Individuals should enhance their digital and health literacy.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"30 3","pages":"14604582241275824"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582241275824","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to assess the quality of the information in WeChat and TikTok videos related to hypertension and diabetes treatment. Methods: A sample of 120 Chinese videos was collected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. The quality was evaluated using DISCERN, JAMA and the latest edition of Chinese guidelines for hypertension and diabetes prevention and treatment, and two observers independently scored each video using the three assessment tools. Results: Among all 120 videos, only 10 scored above 38 points in DISCERN, with 45 videos rated as "very poor". None of the video met all JAMA criteria simultaneously, and there were gaps in accuracy and completeness compared to the two guidelines. Furthermore, there was no significant correlation between information quality and the number of likes and comments. Conclusion: The current quality of information on the treatment of hypertension and diabetes on WeChat and TikTok was unsatisfactory. Consequently, the government should strengthen oversight of information quality, and social media platforms should actively review health-related content to prevent inaccurate information dissemination. Individuals should enhance their digital and health literacy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对微信和嘀嗒上高血压和糖尿病治疗信息质量的评估:横向内容分析
研究目的本研究旨在评估微信和 TikTok 视频中与高血压和糖尿病治疗相关的信息质量。研究方法根据特定的纳入和排除标准,收集了 120 个中文视频样本。使用 DISCERN、JAMA 和最新版中国高血压和糖尿病防治指南对视频质量进行评估,由两名观察者使用这三种评估工具对每个视频进行独立评分。结果:在所有 120 个视频中,只有 10 个视频在 DISCERN 中得分超过 38 分,45 个视频被评为 "非常差"。没有一个视频同时符合 JAMA 的所有标准,在准确性和完整性方面与两个指南相比存在差距。此外,信息质量与点赞和评论数量之间没有明显的相关性。结论目前微信和嘀嗒上有关高血压和糖尿病治疗的信息质量并不令人满意。因此,政府应加强对信息质量的监督,社交媒体平台应积极审查健康相关内容,防止不准确信息的传播。个人应提高数字和健康素养。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
期刊最新文献
Empowering healthcare education: A multilingual ontology for medical informatics and digital health (MIMO) integrated to artificial intelligence powered training in smart hospitals. Analysis of health recommendations using longitudinal quality of life data: QoL@TbA - A transformer-based approach. Analysis of total RNA as a potential biomarker of developmental neurotoxicity in silico. Characterizing pituitary adenomas in clinical notes: Corpus construction and its application in LLMs. HealthCheck: A method for evaluating persuasive mobile health applications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1