Organic acid preservation of cereal grains improves grain quality, growth performance, and intestinal health of post-weaned pigs

IF 2.5 2区 农林科学 Q1 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Animal Feed Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116078
Shane Maher , Torres Sweeney , Dillon P. Kiernan , Marion T. Ryan , Vivian Gath , Stafford Vigors , Kathryn Ruth Connolly , John V. O’Doherty
{"title":"Organic acid preservation of cereal grains improves grain quality, growth performance, and intestinal health of post-weaned pigs","authors":"Shane Maher ,&nbsp;Torres Sweeney ,&nbsp;Dillon P. Kiernan ,&nbsp;Marion T. Ryan ,&nbsp;Vivian Gath ,&nbsp;Stafford Vigors ,&nbsp;Kathryn Ruth Connolly ,&nbsp;John V. O’Doherty","doi":"10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2024.116078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the effect of preserving wheat and barley grains with an organic acid liquid surfactant mould inhibitor compared to conventional artificial drying and assessed its effects on the health and performance of pigs post-weaning (PW). A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement was conducted to investigate the interaction between grain preservation method (dried vs. preserved) and zinc oxide (ZnO) inclusion (yes vs. no) on growth performance, diarrhoea scores and incidence, and total tract nutrient digestibility. One hundred and ninety-two pigs (3 pigs/pen; 16 replicates/treatment) were assigned to one of four experimental diets for 35 days: (1) dried grain diet, (2) preserved grain diet, (3) dried grain diet with ZnO and (4) preserved grain diet with ZnO. Diets were formulated to contain similar levels of net energy and standardised ileal digestible lysine. On day 35 PW, 24 pigs (12 replicates/treatment) from the non-ZnO supplemented groups were euthanised and digesta was collected for coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID), gut microbial population and volatile fatty acid analysis. Stomach tissue was also collected for gene expression analysis, as well as small intestine samples for gut morphology. Notable improvements in grain quality were observed in the preserved grain, including a reduction in grain pH, mould presence, and contamination by mycotoxins, specifically deoxynivalenol in wheat and barley, and ochratoxin A and HT-2 toxin in barley. The preserved grain diet improved average daily gain (ADG; P &lt; 0.01) and body weight (BW; P &lt; 0.01) compared to the dried grain diet. The incorporation of ZnO increased average daily feed intake (ADFI; P &lt; 0.01) and BW (P &lt; 0.05) in the dried grain diet, however, ZnO did not affect ADFI (P &gt; 0.05), and reduced ADG and BW in the preserved grain diet (P &lt; 0.05). Pigs offered the preserved grain diet had reduced faecal scores and diarrhoea incidence compared to those offered the dried grain diet (P &lt; 0.05). Supplementation of ZnO reduced faecal scores and diarrhoea incidence compared to non-supplemented pigs (P &lt; 0.001). On day 35 PW, the preserved grain diet had improved CAID of nitrogen and gross energy (P &lt; 0.05), lower levels of colonic branched-chain volatile fatty acids (P &lt; 0.05), and beneficial shifts in gut microbial populations. Specifically, there was a reduction in ileal <em>Streptococcus</em> (P &lt; 0.001) and an increased abundance of colonic <em>Faecalibacterium</em> (P &lt; 0.05). In conclusion, organic acid preservation improved grain quality, benefiting post-weaned pigs through improved nutrient digestibility and gut health, thus enhancing overall growth performance PW.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7861,"journal":{"name":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","volume":"316 ","pages":"Article 116078"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Animal Feed Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0377840124002062","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the effect of preserving wheat and barley grains with an organic acid liquid surfactant mould inhibitor compared to conventional artificial drying and assessed its effects on the health and performance of pigs post-weaning (PW). A 2 × 2 factorial arrangement was conducted to investigate the interaction between grain preservation method (dried vs. preserved) and zinc oxide (ZnO) inclusion (yes vs. no) on growth performance, diarrhoea scores and incidence, and total tract nutrient digestibility. One hundred and ninety-two pigs (3 pigs/pen; 16 replicates/treatment) were assigned to one of four experimental diets for 35 days: (1) dried grain diet, (2) preserved grain diet, (3) dried grain diet with ZnO and (4) preserved grain diet with ZnO. Diets were formulated to contain similar levels of net energy and standardised ileal digestible lysine. On day 35 PW, 24 pigs (12 replicates/treatment) from the non-ZnO supplemented groups were euthanised and digesta was collected for coefficient of apparent ileal digestibility (CAID), gut microbial population and volatile fatty acid analysis. Stomach tissue was also collected for gene expression analysis, as well as small intestine samples for gut morphology. Notable improvements in grain quality were observed in the preserved grain, including a reduction in grain pH, mould presence, and contamination by mycotoxins, specifically deoxynivalenol in wheat and barley, and ochratoxin A and HT-2 toxin in barley. The preserved grain diet improved average daily gain (ADG; P < 0.01) and body weight (BW; P < 0.01) compared to the dried grain diet. The incorporation of ZnO increased average daily feed intake (ADFI; P < 0.01) and BW (P < 0.05) in the dried grain diet, however, ZnO did not affect ADFI (P > 0.05), and reduced ADG and BW in the preserved grain diet (P < 0.05). Pigs offered the preserved grain diet had reduced faecal scores and diarrhoea incidence compared to those offered the dried grain diet (P < 0.05). Supplementation of ZnO reduced faecal scores and diarrhoea incidence compared to non-supplemented pigs (P < 0.001). On day 35 PW, the preserved grain diet had improved CAID of nitrogen and gross energy (P < 0.05), lower levels of colonic branched-chain volatile fatty acids (P < 0.05), and beneficial shifts in gut microbial populations. Specifically, there was a reduction in ileal Streptococcus (P < 0.001) and an increased abundance of colonic Faecalibacterium (P < 0.05). In conclusion, organic acid preservation improved grain quality, benefiting post-weaned pigs through improved nutrient digestibility and gut health, thus enhancing overall growth performance PW.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
谷物的有机酸保存可改善谷物质量、生长性能和断奶后猪的肠道健康
本研究调查了使用有机酸液体表面活性剂霉菌抑制剂保存小麦和大麦谷物与传统人工干燥相比的效果,并评估了其对猪断奶后(PW)健康和性能的影响。采用 2 × 2 因子排列研究了谷物保存方法(干制与腌制)和氧化锌(ZnO)添加量(是与否)对生长性能、腹泻评分和发病率以及总养分消化率的交互作用。112 头猪(3 头猪/圈;16 个重复/处理)被分配到四种试验日粮中的一种,为期 35 天:(1)干谷物日粮;(2)腌制谷物日粮;(3)含氧化锌的干谷物日粮;(4)含氧化锌的腌制谷物日粮。日粮的净能和标准化回肠可消化赖氨酸含量相似。在第 35 天(PW),对未添加氧化锌组的 24 头猪(12 个重复/处理)实施安乐死,并收集消化液以进行表观回肠消化率系数 (CAID)、肠道微生物数量和挥发性脂肪酸分析。还收集胃组织进行基因表达分析,以及小肠样本进行肠道形态分析。在腌制谷物中观察到谷物质量明显改善,包括谷物 pH 值降低、霉菌存在和霉菌毒素污染,特别是小麦和大麦中的脱氧雪腐镰刀菌烯醇,以及大麦中的赭曲霉毒素 A 和 HT-2 毒素。与干谷日粮相比,腌制谷物日粮提高了平均日增重(ADG;P <;0.01)和体重(BW;P <;0.01)。在干谷物日粮中添加氧化锌可提高平均日采食量(ADFI;P <;0.01)和体重(P <;0.05),但氧化锌不影响ADFI(P >;0.05),并降低腊谷物日粮的ADG和体重(P <;0.05)。与饲喂干粮的猪相比,饲喂腌制谷物日粮的猪的粪便评分和腹泻发生率降低(P <0.05)。与未添加氧化锌的猪相比,添加氧化锌可降低粪便评分和腹泻发生率(P < 0.001)。在第 35 天 PW,腌制谷物日粮改善了氮和总能的 CAID(P < 0.05),降低了结肠支链挥发性脂肪酸的水平(P < 0.05),并使肠道微生物种群发生了有益的变化。具体来说,回肠链球菌减少(P <0.001),结肠粪杆菌增加(P <0.05)。总之,有机酸防腐提高了谷物质量,通过改善营养消化率和肠道健康使断奶后的猪受益,从而提高了整体生长性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Animal Feed Science and Technology
Animal Feed Science and Technology 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
266
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Animal Feed Science and Technology is a unique journal publishing scientific papers of international interest focusing on animal feeds and their feeding. Papers describing research on feed for ruminants and non-ruminants, including poultry, horses, companion animals and aquatic animals, are welcome. The journal covers the following areas: Nutritive value of feeds (e.g., assessment, improvement) Methods of conserving and processing feeds that affect their nutritional value Agronomic and climatic factors influencing the nutritive value of feeds Utilization of feeds and the improvement of such Metabolic, production, reproduction and health responses, as well as potential environmental impacts, of diet inputs and feed technologies (e.g., feeds, feed additives, feed components, mycotoxins) Mathematical models relating directly to animal-feed interactions Analytical and experimental methods for feed evaluation Environmental impacts of feed technologies in animal production.
期刊最新文献
Condensed tannins from black wattle as a promising nutritional additive for Nile tilapia: Growth, immune and antioxidant responses, and gut morphology Dietary supplementation with functional amino acids improves the capacity of growing pigs to cope with a health challenge Effect of psychrotrophic Lactiplantibacillus plantarum L75 with exoploysaccharides-producing property on fermentation, bacterial community, and antioxidant activity of oat silage at low temperature Supplementation of lysophospholipids in calf starter: Effects on growth performance, blood metabolites, health, and ruminal ammonia nitrogen concentration Corrigendum to 'Low sanitary housing conditions increase protein fermentation in piglets but do not aggravate the effects of protein fermentation on intestinal health' [Animal Feed Sci. Technol. 301 (2023) 115669]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1