Did Australia's brief period of carbon pricing impact corporate environmental, financial or social performance?

IF 3.3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100264
Linda Kusumaning Wedari , Amir Moradi-Motlagh , Christine Jubb
{"title":"Did Australia's brief period of carbon pricing impact corporate environmental, financial or social performance?","authors":"Linda Kusumaning Wedari ,&nbsp;Amir Moradi-Motlagh ,&nbsp;Christine Jubb","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study utilizes transaction cost and legitimacy theories to examine whether a carbon tax affects listed companies' environmental, financial and social performance within the context of Australia's <em>National Greenhouse Energy Reporting (NGER) Act</em>. We use a base sample of 346 listed company-year observations for 2012–2017 and employ the System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to deal with bias arising from endogenous explanatory variables in our analysis. We find that the short period of implementation of a carbon tax in Australia was not successful in improving the carbon emissions of the high polluters subject to the tax in our sample. High polluters subject to the tax experienced a positive impact on financial performance and social performance. However, many entities beyond listed companies were subject to the tax, and the period of the tax saw a reduction in total emissions. We conjecture that industry assistance and free carbon credits granted to companies explain these results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824001138/pdfft?md5=baeedfe84c43438e52e633da0d367eb3&pid=1-s2.0-S2666188824001138-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824001138","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study utilizes transaction cost and legitimacy theories to examine whether a carbon tax affects listed companies' environmental, financial and social performance within the context of Australia's National Greenhouse Energy Reporting (NGER) Act. We use a base sample of 346 listed company-year observations for 2012–2017 and employ the System Generalized Method of Moments (GMM) to deal with bias arising from endogenous explanatory variables in our analysis. We find that the short period of implementation of a carbon tax in Australia was not successful in improving the carbon emissions of the high polluters subject to the tax in our sample. High polluters subject to the tax experienced a positive impact on financial performance and social performance. However, many entities beyond listed companies were subject to the tax, and the period of the tax saw a reduction in total emissions. We conjecture that industry assistance and free carbon credits granted to companies explain these results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚短暂的碳定价是否影响了企业的环境、财务或社会绩效?
本研究利用交易成本和合法性理论,在澳大利亚《国家温室能源报告法》(NGER)的背景下,研究碳税是否会影响上市公司的环境、财务和社会绩效。我们使用了 2012-2017 年 346 个上市公司年观测值作为基础样本,并采用系统广义矩量法(GMM)来处理分析中内生解释变量带来的偏差。我们发现,澳大利亚在短时间内实施的碳税并没有成功改善样本中征税的高污染企业的碳排放量。征税的高污染企业对财务绩效和社会绩效产生了积极影响。然而,除上市公司外,许多实体也被征税,而且在征税期间,总排放量有所减少。我们推测,向企业提供的行业援助和免费碳信用额可以解释这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Futures
Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
1.80%
发文量
34
审稿时长
71 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.
期刊最新文献
Decommissioning of a fuel oil-fired thermoelectric power plant in Brazil - Economic feasibility under certain and risk conditions Environmental regulation, R&D subsidies, and industrial green total factor productivity Utilising machine learning for corporate social responsibility (CSR) and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) evaluation: Transitioning from committees to climate Spatial inequality in sub-national human development index: A case study of West Bengal districts Public participation in Governance of E-waste recycling: A tripartite evolutionary game analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1