No substitute for strong institutions: Impact of accelerators on new venture performance

Q1 Business, Management and Accounting Journal of Business Venturing Insights Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00491
Pramendra Singh Tank , Dibyendu Sharma , Divyanshu Jain
{"title":"No substitute for strong institutions: Impact of accelerators on new venture performance","authors":"Pramendra Singh Tank ,&nbsp;Dibyendu Sharma ,&nbsp;Divyanshu Jain","doi":"10.1016/j.jbvi.2024.e00491","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Accelerators are gaining popularity in the entrepreneurship ecosystem for accelerating new ventures by providing benefits such as learning, sorting, and signaling. However, theoretical tension exists about whether these benefits are contingent on quality of institutions. The institutional-void view suggests that accelerator benefits are more pronounced in countries with weak institutions, while the institutional-support view posits the importance of strong institutions for realizing the benefits of accelerators. In this study, we theorize and test the moderating role of institutions in assessing the impact of accelerators on new venture performance using a generalized difference-indifferences technique on a worldwide accelerator database. At the baseline, the findings are consistent with previous literature, which shows a positive impact of accelerators on new ventures performance. More importantly, the key insight of our study is that the positive impact of accelerators is higher in countries with stronger institutions, thus favoring the institutional-support view. These findings contribute to emerging empirical research that assesses the impact of business accelerators on new venture performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38078,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","volume":"22 ","pages":"Article e00491"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Business Venturing Insights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235267342400043X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Business, Management and Accounting","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Accelerators are gaining popularity in the entrepreneurship ecosystem for accelerating new ventures by providing benefits such as learning, sorting, and signaling. However, theoretical tension exists about whether these benefits are contingent on quality of institutions. The institutional-void view suggests that accelerator benefits are more pronounced in countries with weak institutions, while the institutional-support view posits the importance of strong institutions for realizing the benefits of accelerators. In this study, we theorize and test the moderating role of institutions in assessing the impact of accelerators on new venture performance using a generalized difference-indifferences technique on a worldwide accelerator database. At the baseline, the findings are consistent with previous literature, which shows a positive impact of accelerators on new ventures performance. More importantly, the key insight of our study is that the positive impact of accelerators is higher in countries with stronger institutions, thus favoring the institutional-support view. These findings contribute to emerging empirical research that assesses the impact of business accelerators on new venture performance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
强大的机构不可替代:加速器对新创企业业绩的影响
在创业生态系统中,加速器通过提供学习、排序和信号等好处来加速新企业的发展,因而越来越受欢迎。然而,关于这些益处是否取决于制度的质量,理论上存在分歧。制度缺失观点认为,在制度薄弱的国家,加速器的益处更为明显;而制度支持观点则认为,强有力的制度对于实现加速器的益处非常重要。在本研究中,我们在评估加速器对新创企业绩效的影响时,采用广义差分法对全球加速器数据库进行了理论分析,并检验了制度的调节作用。从基线上看,研究结果与之前的文献一致,都表明加速器对新创企业的绩效有积极影响。更重要的是,我们研究的关键见解是,在制度较健全的国家,加速器的积极影响更大,因此有利于制度支持观点。这些发现为评估企业加速器对新创企业绩效影响的新兴实证研究做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Business Venturing Insights
Journal of Business Venturing Insights Business, Management and Accounting-Business and International Management
CiteScore
11.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
62
审稿时长
28 days
期刊最新文献
Empirical entrepreneurial ecosystem research: A guide to creating multilevel datasets The myth of entrepreneurship as a tool: Reorienting business venturing as a goal in itself in a post-growth society Self-employment and inflammation in older adults: Examining biomarkers in the survey of health, ageing and retirement in Europe Not all leavers are equal: How rank and destination influence enforcement of restrictive covenants How sector fluidity (knowledge-intensiveness and innovation) shapes startups’ resilience during crises
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1