Drifting further apart? Europe's trends of urban-rural political polarisation should not be overstated

IF 4.7 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY Political Geography Pub Date : 2024-08-12 DOI:10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103181
Davide Luca , Michael Kenny
{"title":"Drifting further apart? Europe's trends of urban-rural political polarisation should not be overstated","authors":"Davide Luca ,&nbsp;Michael Kenny","doi":"10.1016/j.polgeo.2024.103181","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Urban-rural polarisation in political attitudes is widely argued to have become a distinctive feature of many Western democracies. Yet, have urban-rural gaps grown over time, as is often suggested? And, if so, do trends in this regard differ across countries? We address these questions leveraging individual-level data from over 300,000 respondents from the European Social Survey over the period 2002-2020 in 25 countries. Overall, we do find evidence of moderate divergence in outlooks between more urban and more rural publics, examining in particular trust towards the EU and views on migration. We also find that there is divergence in terms of feelings of trust in relation to the political system and levels of satisfaction with democracy since the early 2010s, most likely because of the financial and sovereign debt crises. But these gaps have significantly reduced more recently. Furthermore, trends are heterogenous across countries. Overall, this paper demonstrates that value polarisation along the urban density divide should not be over emphasised as divergence between urban and rural Europe is more moderate than in the US, and very issue-based and country-specific.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48262,"journal":{"name":"Political Geography","volume":"114 ","pages":"Article 103181"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001306/pdfft?md5=3e17c6ed06d84d1518988e44be3d8998&pid=1-s2.0-S0962629824001306-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Political Geography","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0962629824001306","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urban-rural polarisation in political attitudes is widely argued to have become a distinctive feature of many Western democracies. Yet, have urban-rural gaps grown over time, as is often suggested? And, if so, do trends in this regard differ across countries? We address these questions leveraging individual-level data from over 300,000 respondents from the European Social Survey over the period 2002-2020 in 25 countries. Overall, we do find evidence of moderate divergence in outlooks between more urban and more rural publics, examining in particular trust towards the EU and views on migration. We also find that there is divergence in terms of feelings of trust in relation to the political system and levels of satisfaction with democracy since the early 2010s, most likely because of the financial and sovereign debt crises. But these gaps have significantly reduced more recently. Furthermore, trends are heterogenous across countries. Overall, this paper demonstrates that value polarisation along the urban density divide should not be over emphasised as divergence between urban and rural Europe is more moderate than in the US, and very issue-based and country-specific.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
渐行渐远?不应夸大欧洲城乡政治两极分化的趋势
人们普遍认为,政治态度上的城乡两极分化已成为许多西方民主国家的一个显著特征。然而,随着时间的推移,城乡差距是否如人们通常所说的那样扩大了?如果是,各国在这方面的趋势是否有所不同?我们利用 2002-2020 年间欧洲社会调查中 25 个国家 30 多万受访者的个人层面数据来解决这些问题。总体而言,我们发现有证据表明,城市公众和农村公众的观点存在适度差异,尤其是在对欧盟的信任度和对移民的看法方面。我们还发现,自 2010 年代初以来,在对政治制度的信任感和对民主的满意度方面也存在差异,这很可能是由于金融和主权债务危机造成的。但最近这些差距已明显缩小。此外,各国的趋势也不尽相同。总之,本文表明,不应过分强调城市密度分界线上的价值两极分化,因为欧洲城乡之间的差异比美国更为温和,而且是基于特定问题和特定国家的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.60%
发文量
210
期刊介绍: Political Geography is the flagship journal of political geography and research on the spatial dimensions of politics. The journal brings together leading contributions in its field, promoting international and interdisciplinary communication. Research emphases cover all scales of inquiry and diverse theories, methods, and methodologies.
期刊最新文献
Fragmenting forest governance: Land tenure and the REDD+ paradox in Kigoma pilot project, Tanzania Assembling governance in São Paulo's "Cracolândia" Negotiating (under)development? Expanding bargaining power within globalised production networks “There, seated upon the toilet, apparently in the midst of defecation, was the president of the United States”: Toilets and elite politics in the USA and UK Making sense of clandestine graves: Material epistemology and the political geography of uncertain knowledge
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1