Asserting the visibility of social work in science.

IF 2 Q2 SOCIOLOGY Frontiers in Sociology Pub Date : 2024-07-31 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1411781
Ariadna Munté-Pascual, María Virginia Matulič-Domandzič, Ane López de Aguileta, Emilia Aiello, Carmen Elboj, Diana Valero, Patricia Melgar
{"title":"Asserting the visibility of social work in science.","authors":"Ariadna Munté-Pascual, María Virginia Matulič-Domandzič, Ane López de Aguileta, Emilia Aiello, Carmen Elboj, Diana Valero, Patricia Melgar","doi":"10.3389/fsoc.2024.1411781","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Scientific evidence has shown that Social Work has frequently been considered a second-level discipline in the traditional sexist hierarchy, because pioneers and most social workers are women. The twofold objective of this article is to analyze the dynamics that overcome this consideration and to put forward actions to go further in the near future. The factors that limit these actions and those that make them possible are studied. This article exposes the dynamics of the current transformation of Social Work, namely, the increase in the importance of social impact in social research, the increase in interdisciplinarity, and the impact of interdisciplinary research.</p>","PeriodicalId":36297,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11322067/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsoc.2024.1411781","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Scientific evidence has shown that Social Work has frequently been considered a second-level discipline in the traditional sexist hierarchy, because pioneers and most social workers are women. The twofold objective of this article is to analyze the dynamics that overcome this consideration and to put forward actions to go further in the near future. The factors that limit these actions and those that make them possible are studied. This article exposes the dynamics of the current transformation of Social Work, namely, the increase in the importance of social impact in social research, the increase in interdisciplinarity, and the impact of interdisciplinary research.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
证明社会工作在科学中的可见性。
科学证据表明,在传统的性别歧视等级制度中,社会工作经常被视为二级学科,因为先驱者和 大多数社会工作者都是女性。本文有两个目的,一是分析克服这种考虑的动力,二是提出在不久的将来更进一步的行动。本文研究了限制这些行动的因素和使这些行动成为可能的因素。本文揭示了当前社会工作转型的动力,即社会影响在社会研究中的重要性增加、跨学科性增加以及跨学科研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Sociology
Frontiers in Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
198
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Evaluating policies and regulations used to control corruption among accounting officers in the public sector of South Africa: a systematic literature review. Who is the next leader? Understanding women leadership development and succession planning in Saudi Arabian higher educational institutions. Communicating international politics narratives of security, democracy and human rights in contemporary society: indexing and analysis using online monitoring data. On the brink of social resistance: local community perceptions of mining company operating permits in East Luwu, Indonesia. COVID-19, social media, algorithms and the rise of indigenous movements in Southern Africa: perspectives from activists, audiences and policymakers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1