Validation and Refinement of the Self-Regulatory HIV/AIDS Symptom Management Model Among People With HIV in China Using Path Analysis: A Secondary Data Analysis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1097/JNC.0000000000000493
Meilian Xie, Aiping Wang, Zhiyun Zhang, Kerong Wang, Yanping Yu
{"title":"Validation and Refinement of the Self-Regulatory HIV/AIDS Symptom Management Model Among People With HIV in China Using Path Analysis: A Secondary Data Analysis.","authors":"Meilian Xie, Aiping Wang, Zhiyun Zhang, Kerong Wang, Yanping Yu","doi":"10.1097/JNC.0000000000000493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>This study explored the path affecting the quality of life (QOL) of people with HIV in China and clarified the applicability and interpretability of the Self-Regulatory HIV/AIDS Symptom Management Model. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in nine regions of China and collected information about demographics, symptom experience, social support, perceived symptom manageability, self-efficacy, and QOL. A total of 711 patients participated in this survey. After four rounds of path analysis were conducted, the most fit indices met the standards (χ 2 /df = 2.633, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.081, Goodness-of-Fit Index/Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index/Comparative Fit Index/Incremental Fit Index/Tucker-Lewis Coefficient > 0.9), and the relationships between variables were statistically significant ( p < .05). Among all the pathways, social support had the most significant impact on the QOL, with a total path coefficient of 0.665. Symptom experience, as a negative factor, had a total effect value of -0.361. This study showed how all the factors influencing QOL were interconnected, serving as a crucial theoretical foundation for intervention strategies in future clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":50263,"journal":{"name":"Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care","volume":" ","pages":"495-506"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11520334/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Janac-Journal of the Association of Nurses in Aids Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JNC.0000000000000493","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: This study explored the path affecting the quality of life (QOL) of people with HIV in China and clarified the applicability and interpretability of the Self-Regulatory HIV/AIDS Symptom Management Model. We conducted a cross-sectional survey in nine regions of China and collected information about demographics, symptom experience, social support, perceived symptom manageability, self-efficacy, and QOL. A total of 711 patients participated in this survey. After four rounds of path analysis were conducted, the most fit indices met the standards (χ 2 /df = 2.633, Root Mean Square Error of Approximation = 0.081, Goodness-of-Fit Index/Adjusted Goodness-of-Fit Index/Comparative Fit Index/Incremental Fit Index/Tucker-Lewis Coefficient > 0.9), and the relationships between variables were statistically significant ( p < .05). Among all the pathways, social support had the most significant impact on the QOL, with a total path coefficient of 0.665. Symptom experience, as a negative factor, had a total effect value of -0.361. This study showed how all the factors influencing QOL were interconnected, serving as a crucial theoretical foundation for intervention strategies in future clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
艾滋病病毒感染者生活质量的路径分析:自我调节艾滋病症状管理模式的验证与完善。
摘要:本研究探讨了影响中国艾滋病病毒感染者生活质量(QOL)的路径,并阐明了自律性艾滋病症状管理模型的适用性和可解释性。我们在中国九个地区进行了横断面调查,收集了有关人口统计学、症状体验、社会支持、感知症状可控性、自我效能和 QOL 的信息。共有 711 名患者参与了此次调查。经过四轮路径分析,大部分拟合指数符合标准(χ2/df = 2.633,近似均方根误差 = 0.081,拟合优度指数/调整后拟合优度指数/比较拟合指数/增量拟合指数/塔克-刘易斯系数 > 0.9),变量之间的关系具有统计学意义(P < .05)。在所有路径中,社会支持对 QOL 的影响最为显著,总路径系数为 0.665。症状体验作为一个负面因素,其总效应值为-0.361。这项研究显示了影响 QOL 的所有因素是如何相互关联的,为今后临床实践中的干预策略提供了重要的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
10.00%
发文量
120
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care (JANAC) is a peer-reviewed, international nursing journal that covers the full spectrum of the global HIV epidemic, focusing on prevention, evidence-based care management, interprofessional clinical care, research, advocacy, policy, education, social determinants of health, epidemiology, and program development. JANAC functions according to the highest standards of ethical publishing practices and offers innovative publication options, including Open Access and prepublication article posting, where the journal can post articles before they are published with an issue.
期刊最新文献
Gait Speed, Mobility, Balance, and Dual-Tasking Deficits Among People Living With HIV Globally: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Validation and Refinement of the Self-Regulatory HIV/AIDS Symptom Management Model Among People With HIV in China Using Path Analysis: A Secondary Data Analysis. Emotional Loneliness Is Related to Objective Cognitive Function in Older People With HIV in the Washington-Baltimore Area: A Cross-sectional Study. Perspectives and Factors Related to Pre-exposure Prophylaxis Use Among Young Men Who Have Sex With Men in the United States: A Mixed-Methods Study on the Role of History of PrEP Use. An Integrative Review of the Literature Examining Sexual Relationship Power, Depressive Symptoms, Silencing the Self, and HIV Vulnerability for Women in the United States.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1