Profiling vaccine hesitancy in nursing to tailor public healthcare policies: A cross-sectional international study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Journal of Nursing Scholarship Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1111/jnu.13016
Jemma McCready, Goran Erfani, Dania Comparcini, Giancarlo Cicolini, Kristina Mikkonen, Jeremia Keisala, Marco Tomietto
{"title":"Profiling vaccine hesitancy in nursing to tailor public healthcare policies: A cross-sectional international study.","authors":"Jemma McCready, Goran Erfani, Dania Comparcini, Giancarlo Cicolini, Kristina Mikkonen, Jeremia Keisala, Marco Tomietto","doi":"10.1111/jnu.13016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue of global concern. As nurses play a vital role in delivering patient care and shaping public opinions on vaccines, interventions to address vaccine hesitancy in nursing are imperative. As such, identifying profiles of characteristics and attitudes contributing to hesitancy may help identify specific areas of focus to target tailored global vaccination uptake campaigns. The purpose of this study was to profile the characteristics and attitudes contributing to hesitancy toward COVID-19 and Influenza vaccines in the nursing community.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This multisite, cross-sectional study recruited 1967 registered nurses and 1230 nursing students from the United Kingdom, Finland, and Italy between March and September 2023.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data collection involved an online survey adopting the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale, the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, and questions pertaining to sociodemographic and occupational characteristics. A k-means cluster analysis was used to identify various clusters of hesitancy based on the VAX Scale. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to identify significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, occupational factors, vaccination attitudes, and social media usage between the clusters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three distinct clusters were identified. Profile A showed high vaccine confidence, profile B displayed slight hesitancy, and profile C reported high levels of hesitancy. In profile C, higher levels of vaccine hesitancy were identified in younger, less experienced nurses with lower educational attainment. While older nurses with higher educational attainment, who were in senior roles, were more vaccine-confident and had a consistent history of accepting the Influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations (profile A). The study found Italian nurses highly hesitant (profile C), British nurses highly confident (profile A), and Finnish nurses evenly distributed between confident, slightly hesitant, and highly hesitant (profiles A, B, and C, respectively). In addition, more frequent usage of Instagram and TikTok was associated with vaccine hesitancy (profiles B and C), and LinkedIn and X were more common among vaccine-confident individuals (profile A).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study has identified specific sociodemographic and occupational factors that are related to vaccine hesitancy in an international sample of nurses. Additionally, attitudes contributing to hesitancy were identified, with worries about unforeseen future effects of the vaccine being identified as a critical attitude that may undermine confidence and increase hesitancy in nursing. This study also sheds light on the influence that social media platforms have on vaccine hesitancy and, as such, indicates which platforms are effective to disseminate vaccination campaigns to global nursing communities.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>Global vaccination campaigns should focus on specific profiles and clusters to promote vaccination in the international nursing community. Empowering nurses early in their careers will help to instill positive vaccination behaviors, ensuring a sustained uptake of vaccinations throughout the individual's career and beyond, with an impact on promoting vaccination at the public health level as well.</p>","PeriodicalId":51091,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Scholarship","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.13016","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Vaccine hesitancy is a complex issue of global concern. As nurses play a vital role in delivering patient care and shaping public opinions on vaccines, interventions to address vaccine hesitancy in nursing are imperative. As such, identifying profiles of characteristics and attitudes contributing to hesitancy may help identify specific areas of focus to target tailored global vaccination uptake campaigns. The purpose of this study was to profile the characteristics and attitudes contributing to hesitancy toward COVID-19 and Influenza vaccines in the nursing community.

Design: This multisite, cross-sectional study recruited 1967 registered nurses and 1230 nursing students from the United Kingdom, Finland, and Italy between March and September 2023.

Methods: Data collection involved an online survey adopting the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) Scale, the Bergen Social Media Addiction Scale, and questions pertaining to sociodemographic and occupational characteristics. A k-means cluster analysis was used to identify various clusters of hesitancy based on the VAX Scale. One-way ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to identify significant differences in sociodemographic characteristics, occupational factors, vaccination attitudes, and social media usage between the clusters.

Results: Three distinct clusters were identified. Profile A showed high vaccine confidence, profile B displayed slight hesitancy, and profile C reported high levels of hesitancy. In profile C, higher levels of vaccine hesitancy were identified in younger, less experienced nurses with lower educational attainment. While older nurses with higher educational attainment, who were in senior roles, were more vaccine-confident and had a consistent history of accepting the Influenza and COVID-19 vaccinations (profile A). The study found Italian nurses highly hesitant (profile C), British nurses highly confident (profile A), and Finnish nurses evenly distributed between confident, slightly hesitant, and highly hesitant (profiles A, B, and C, respectively). In addition, more frequent usage of Instagram and TikTok was associated with vaccine hesitancy (profiles B and C), and LinkedIn and X were more common among vaccine-confident individuals (profile A).

Conclusions: This study has identified specific sociodemographic and occupational factors that are related to vaccine hesitancy in an international sample of nurses. Additionally, attitudes contributing to hesitancy were identified, with worries about unforeseen future effects of the vaccine being identified as a critical attitude that may undermine confidence and increase hesitancy in nursing. This study also sheds light on the influence that social media platforms have on vaccine hesitancy and, as such, indicates which platforms are effective to disseminate vaccination campaigns to global nursing communities.

Clinical relevance: Global vaccination campaigns should focus on specific profiles and clusters to promote vaccination in the international nursing community. Empowering nurses early in their careers will help to instill positive vaccination behaviors, ensuring a sustained uptake of vaccinations throughout the individual's career and beyond, with an impact on promoting vaccination at the public health level as well.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剖析护理人员对疫苗的犹豫不决,以调整公共医疗保健政策:一项横断面国际研究。
导言:疫苗犹豫不决是一个全球关注的复杂问题。由于护士在提供患者护理和影响公众对疫苗的看法方面发挥着至关重要的作用,因此必须采取干预措施来解决护士对疫苗犹豫不决的问题。因此,确定导致犹豫不决的特征和态度可能有助于确定具体的重点领域,从而有针对性地开展全球疫苗接种活动。本研究的目的是分析导致护士群体对 COVID-19 和流感疫苗犹豫不决的特征和态度:这项多地点横断面研究在 2023 年 3 月至 9 月间招募了来自英国、芬兰和意大利的 1967 名注册护士和 1230 名护理专业学生:数据收集包括一项在线调查,采用疫苗接种态度调查(VAX)量表、卑尔根社交媒体成瘾量表以及与社会人口学和职业特征相关的问题。根据 VAX 量表,采用 k-means 聚类分析来确定不同的犹豫不决群组。采用单因子方差分析和卡方检验来确定不同群组之间在社会人口特征、职业因素、疫苗接种态度和社交媒体使用方面的显著差异:结果:发现了三个不同的群组。A 组表现出高度的疫苗接种信心,B 组表现出轻微的犹豫不决,C 组则表现出高度的犹豫不决。在特征 C 中,发现学历较低、经验较少的年轻护士对疫苗的犹豫程度较高。而教育程度较高、担任高级职务的年长护士则对接种疫苗更有信心,并一直接受流感和 COVID-19 疫苗接种(特征 A)。研究发现,意大利护士高度犹豫(特征 C),英国护士高度自信(特征 A),芬兰护士在自信、略微犹豫和高度犹豫之间分布均匀(分别为特征 A、B 和 C)。此外,Instagram 和 TikTok 的使用频率与疫苗犹豫不决有关(资料 B 和 C),而 LinkedIn 和 X 在疫苗自信者中更为常见(资料 A):本研究在国际护士样本中发现了与疫苗犹豫不决有关的特定社会人口和职业因素。此外,研究还发现了导致犹豫不决的态度,其中对疫苗未来不可预见的影响的担忧被认为是可能会削弱信心并增加护士犹豫不决的关键态度。本研究还揭示了社交媒体平台对疫苗接种犹豫不决的影响,并因此指出了哪些平台可以有效地向全球护理社区传播疫苗接种活动:临床相关性:全球疫苗接种活动应关注特定人群和集群,以促进国际护理界的疫苗接种。在护士职业生涯的早期对其进行赋权将有助于灌输积极的疫苗接种行为,确保其在整个职业生涯及以后持续接种疫苗,并在公共卫生层面促进疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
5.90%
发文量
85
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This widely read and respected journal features peer-reviewed, thought-provoking articles representing research by some of the world’s leading nurse researchers. Reaching health professionals, faculty and students in 103 countries, the Journal of Nursing Scholarship is focused on health of people throughout the world. It is the official journal of Sigma Theta Tau International and it reflects the society’s dedication to providing the tools necessary to improve nursing care around the world.
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness of integrated care models for stroke patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Decoding machine learning in nursing research: A scoping review of effective algorithms. The effects of applying artificial intelligence to triage in the emergency department: A systematic review of prospective studies Issue Information Machine learning methods to discover hidden patterns in well-being and resilience for healthy aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1