Yanping Liu , Zhaoyong Hu , Genxu Wang , Arthur Gessler , Shouqin Sun
{"title":"The applicability of a SIF-based mechanistic model for estimating GPP at the canopy scale","authors":"Yanping Liu , Zhaoyong Hu , Genxu Wang , Arthur Gessler , Shouqin Sun","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2024.110192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Mechanistically linking gross primary productivity (GPP) and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an essential step to unleash the full potential of SIF for remote sensing-based predictions of GPP across biomes, climates, and spatiotemporal scales. The latest SIF-based mechanistic light response model that includes the fraction of open photosystem II reaction centers as key parameter (qMLR-SIF model), can accurately reproduce leaf-scale photosynthesis under various conditions. However, it remains unclear to what extent the qMLR-SIF model is suitable for estimating GPP at larger scales such as the canopy scale. Therefore, canopy-scale data of tower-based far-red SIF, GPP and key environmental variables from 10 study sites were collected to analyze the SIF-GPP relationship and to compare the qMLR-SIF model with the widely used Farquhar, von Caemmerer, Berry (FvCB) model and with a light use efficiency (LUE) model for different plant functional types (PFTs), photosynthetic pathways (C<sub>3</sub> and C<sub>4</sub>), and temporal scales (hourly, daily and 4-day). Results showed that the nonlinear SIF-GPP relationship existed in all PFTs and the degree of linearity increased at larger temporal scales. The qMLR-SIF model exhibited wide applicability to quantify canopy GPP for different PFTs (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.55–0.80, RMSE = 2.72–11.03 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>), photosynthetic pathways (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.70–0.78, RMSE = 5.29–9.05 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup> s<sup>-1</sup>) and temporal scales (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.82–0.97, RMSE = 3.42–8.32 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>). Compared with the two other models, the qMLR-SIF model performed best overall, which is mainly due to its simpler model structure and the mechanistic link between SIF and photosynthesis. Particularly, the qMLR-SIF model could more accurately estimate GPP in C<sub>4</sub> species, with higher R<sup>2</sup> (0.78) and lower RMSE (8.46 μmol CO<sub>2</sub> m<sup>-2</sup>s<sup>-1</sup>). These findings highlight the advantages of the qMLR-SIF model in GPP estimation at the canopy scale, showing its potential in applications at regional and global scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192324003058","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Mechanistically linking gross primary productivity (GPP) and sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) is an essential step to unleash the full potential of SIF for remote sensing-based predictions of GPP across biomes, climates, and spatiotemporal scales. The latest SIF-based mechanistic light response model that includes the fraction of open photosystem II reaction centers as key parameter (qMLR-SIF model), can accurately reproduce leaf-scale photosynthesis under various conditions. However, it remains unclear to what extent the qMLR-SIF model is suitable for estimating GPP at larger scales such as the canopy scale. Therefore, canopy-scale data of tower-based far-red SIF, GPP and key environmental variables from 10 study sites were collected to analyze the SIF-GPP relationship and to compare the qMLR-SIF model with the widely used Farquhar, von Caemmerer, Berry (FvCB) model and with a light use efficiency (LUE) model for different plant functional types (PFTs), photosynthetic pathways (C3 and C4), and temporal scales (hourly, daily and 4-day). Results showed that the nonlinear SIF-GPP relationship existed in all PFTs and the degree of linearity increased at larger temporal scales. The qMLR-SIF model exhibited wide applicability to quantify canopy GPP for different PFTs (R2 = 0.55–0.80, RMSE = 2.72–11.03 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1), photosynthetic pathways (R2 = 0.70–0.78, RMSE = 5.29–9.05 μmol CO2 m-2 s-1) and temporal scales (R2 = 0.82–0.97, RMSE = 3.42–8.32 μmol CO2 m-2s-1). Compared with the two other models, the qMLR-SIF model performed best overall, which is mainly due to its simpler model structure and the mechanistic link between SIF and photosynthesis. Particularly, the qMLR-SIF model could more accurately estimate GPP in C4 species, with higher R2 (0.78) and lower RMSE (8.46 μmol CO2 m-2s-1). These findings highlight the advantages of the qMLR-SIF model in GPP estimation at the canopy scale, showing its potential in applications at regional and global scales.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published.
Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.