Roberta Südy , John Diaper , Davide Bizzotto , Rafaelle Dellàca , Ferenc Petak , Walid Habre , Andre Dos Santos Rocha
{"title":"Variable positive end-expiratory pressure in an experimental model of acute respiratory distress syndrome: an advanced ventilation modality","authors":"Roberta Südy , John Diaper , Davide Bizzotto , Rafaelle Dellàca , Ferenc Petak , Walid Habre , Andre Dos Santos Rocha","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PC group: <em>n</em>=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H<sub>2</sub>O (PC-VEEP group; <em>n</em>=6). Lung oxygenation index (<em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub>) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (<em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> <27 kPa). The <em>P</em>a<span>o</span><sub>2</sub>/FiO<sub>2</sub> was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [<span>sd</span> 3.5] <em>vs</em> 19.2 [7.2] kPa, <em>P</em>=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO<sub>2</sub> at 1–3 h (<em>P</em><0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO<sub>2</sub>, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"11 ","pages":"Article 100302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000467/pdfft?md5=bb75ea3ad3c8a7e3b54a06862b85ba1d&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609624000467-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624000467","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Introducing variability in tidal volume, ventilatory frequency, or both is beneficial during mechanical ventilation in acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). We investigated whether applying cycle-by-cycle variability in the positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) exerts beneficial effect on lung function in a model of ARDS.
Methods
Rabbits with lung injury were randomly allocated to receive mechanical ventilation for 6 h by applying a pressure-controlled mode with constant PEEP of 7 cm H2O (PC group: n=6) or variable PEEP (VEEP) with a coefficient of variation of 21.4%, range 4–10 cm H2O (PC-VEEP group; n=6). Lung oxygenation index (Pao2/FiO2) after 6 h of ventilation (H6) was the primary outcome and respiratory mechanics, lung volume, intrapulmonary shunt, and lung inflammatory markers were secondary outcomes.
Results
After lung injury, both groups presented moderate-to-severe ARDS (Pao2/FiO2 <27 kPa). The Pao2/FiO2 was significantly higher in the PC-VEEP group than in the PC group at H6 (12.3 [sd 3.5] vs 19.2 [7.2] kPa, P=0.013) and a lower arterial partial pressure of CO2 at 1–3 h (P<0.02). The ventilation-induced increases in airway resistance and tissue elastance were prevented by PC-VEEP. There was no evidence for a difference in minute volume, driving pressure, end-tidal CO2, lung volumes, intrapulmonary shunt fraction, and cytokines between the ventilation modes.
Conclusions
Prolonged mechanical ventilation with cycle-by-cycle VEEP prevents deterioration in gas exchange and respiratory mechanics in a model of ARDS, suggesting the benefit of this novel ventilation strategy to optimise gas exchange without increasing driving pressure and lung overdistension.