Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion

Akshay Shah , Hayley G. Evans , Antony J.R. Palmer , Alan M. MacDonald , Martha Belete , Linda von Neree , Michael M.F. Murphy , Simon J. Stanworth , Robbie Foy , for the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Data Driven Transfusion Practice
{"title":"Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion","authors":"Akshay Shah ,&nbsp;Hayley G. Evans ,&nbsp;Antony J.R. Palmer ,&nbsp;Alan M. MacDonald ,&nbsp;Martha Belete ,&nbsp;Linda von Neree ,&nbsp;Michael M.F. Murphy ,&nbsp;Simon J. Stanworth ,&nbsp;Robbie Foy ,&nbsp;for the NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Data Driven Transfusion Practice","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2024.100372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common intervention in patients undergoing surgery but there is marked variation in practice. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are central to identifying deviation from agreed standards and improving clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify KPIs which can potentially be measured from routinely collected electronic healthcare records.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We undertook a three-stage process. First, we completed a scoping review to identify potential KPIs from relevant literature and clinical guidelines. Next, we conducted a modified RAND consensus process with a multidisciplinary panel including medical professionals, patients and public involvement members. The consensus panel rated these KPIs according to importance and feasibility.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We identified 28 candidate KPIs covering the entire perioperative RBC transfusion process. The majority of the KPIs focused on improving patient care around the time of decision to transfuse RBCs and transfusion safety. Clinical outcome KPIs included hospital length of stay, hospital acquired infection, mortality, and hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days. Five candidate KPIs were judged as unimportant whilst there were concerns around the feasibility of measurement using routine data for 14 candidate KPIs. The panel identified nine potential KPIs for future testing.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Using a systematic, stepwise, transparent approach, we have identified a set of 28 KPIs for assessment, monitoring, and improvement of perioperative RBC transfusion. Future research is needed to further validate this set for external use and benchmarking between hospitals and departments.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 100372"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609624001229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Perioperative red blood cell (RBC) transfusion is a common intervention in patients undergoing surgery but there is marked variation in practice. Key performance indicators (KPIs) are central to identifying deviation from agreed standards and improving clinical outcomes. We aimed to identify KPIs which can potentially be measured from routinely collected electronic healthcare records.

Methods

We undertook a three-stage process. First, we completed a scoping review to identify potential KPIs from relevant literature and clinical guidelines. Next, we conducted a modified RAND consensus process with a multidisciplinary panel including medical professionals, patients and public involvement members. The consensus panel rated these KPIs according to importance and feasibility.

Results

We identified 28 candidate KPIs covering the entire perioperative RBC transfusion process. The majority of the KPIs focused on improving patient care around the time of decision to transfuse RBCs and transfusion safety. Clinical outcome KPIs included hospital length of stay, hospital acquired infection, mortality, and hospital readmission at 30 and 90 days. Five candidate KPIs were judged as unimportant whilst there were concerns around the feasibility of measurement using routine data for 14 candidate KPIs. The panel identified nine potential KPIs for future testing.

Conclusions

Using a systematic, stepwise, transparent approach, we have identified a set of 28 KPIs for assessment, monitoring, and improvement of perioperative RBC transfusion. Future research is needed to further validate this set for external use and benchmarking between hospitals and departments.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Frameworks for the design and reporting of anaesthesia interventions in perioperative clinical trials Peripherally inserted central catheters versus implanted port catheters in patients with breast cancer: a post hoc analysis of the PICCPORT randomised controlled trial Barriers and enablers to recruiting participants within paediatric perioperative and anaesthetic settings: lessons learned from a trial of melatonin versus midazolam in the premedication of anxious children (the MAGIC trial) The concerted actions of microRNA-29a and interferon-β modulate complete Freund's adjuvant-induced inflammatory pain by regulating the expression of type 1 interferon receptor, interferon-stimulated gene 15, and p-extracellular signal-regulated kinase Development of a key performance indicator set for perioperative red blood cell transfusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1