An ecosystem of tactics: Bridging the radical and moderate flanks in a pipeline resistance movement

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103714
{"title":"An ecosystem of tactics: Bridging the radical and moderate flanks in a pipeline resistance movement","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the role of “bridge activists” in the Mountain Valley Pipeline resistance movement who acted to build mutual respect, solidarity and collective identity in a movement characterized by diverse tactics. Bridge activists operate in both moderate and radical flanks of a movement, bridging disparate movement factions. We argue these bridge activists enabled the development of an “ecosystem of tactics” within the movement. Contrary to a “diversity of tactics” approach, an ecosystem of tactics approach is grounded in mutual respect and the solidarity of a common goal (in this case, stopping the Mountain Valley Pipeline). Our findings suggest intentional bridge activism may empower current and future movements through encouraging participation, mediating conflict, developing collective identity and generating solidarity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the role of “bridge activists” in the Mountain Valley Pipeline resistance movement who acted to build mutual respect, solidarity and collective identity in a movement characterized by diverse tactics. Bridge activists operate in both moderate and radical flanks of a movement, bridging disparate movement factions. We argue these bridge activists enabled the development of an “ecosystem of tactics” within the movement. Contrary to a “diversity of tactics” approach, an ecosystem of tactics approach is grounded in mutual respect and the solidarity of a common goal (in this case, stopping the Mountain Valley Pipeline). Our findings suggest intentional bridge activism may empower current and future movements through encouraging participation, mediating conflict, developing collective identity and generating solidarity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
战术生态系统:管道阻力运动中激进派与温和派之间的桥梁
本文探讨了 "桥梁积极分子 "在山谷管道抵抗运动中的作用,他们在这场以多样化策略为特点的运动中,建立了相互尊重、团结和集体认同感。架桥积极分子在运动的温和派和激进派两侧开展活动,在不同的运动派别之间架起桥梁。我们认为,这些桥梁活动家促成了运动内部 "战术生态系统 "的发展。与 "战术多样性 "的方法相反,战术生态系统的方法是以相互尊重和共同目标(在本例中,即阻止山谷管道)的团结为基础的。我们的研究结果表明,有意识的桥梁行动主义可以通过鼓励参与、调解冲突、发展集体认同感和产生团结来增强当前和未来运动的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Making space for environmental justice in renewable energy planning Large inequalities in climate mitigation scenarios are not supported by theories of distributive justice Embracing complexity: Microgrids and community engagement in Australia Policy mixes for net-zero energy transitions: Insights from energy sector integration in Germany Enablers or barriers: The multifaceted tales of power generation companies in China's energy transition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1