{"title":"An ecosystem of tactics: Bridging the radical and moderate flanks in a pipeline resistance movement","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper explores the role of “bridge activists” in the Mountain Valley Pipeline resistance movement who acted to build mutual respect, solidarity and collective identity in a movement characterized by diverse tactics. Bridge activists operate in both moderate and radical flanks of a movement, bridging disparate movement factions. We argue these bridge activists enabled the development of an “ecosystem of tactics” within the movement. Contrary to a “diversity of tactics” approach, an ecosystem of tactics approach is grounded in mutual respect and the solidarity of a common goal (in this case, stopping the Mountain Valley Pipeline). Our findings suggest intentional bridge activism may empower current and future movements through encouraging participation, mediating conflict, developing collective identity and generating solidarity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624003050","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This paper explores the role of “bridge activists” in the Mountain Valley Pipeline resistance movement who acted to build mutual respect, solidarity and collective identity in a movement characterized by diverse tactics. Bridge activists operate in both moderate and radical flanks of a movement, bridging disparate movement factions. We argue these bridge activists enabled the development of an “ecosystem of tactics” within the movement. Contrary to a “diversity of tactics” approach, an ecosystem of tactics approach is grounded in mutual respect and the solidarity of a common goal (in this case, stopping the Mountain Valley Pipeline). Our findings suggest intentional bridge activism may empower current and future movements through encouraging participation, mediating conflict, developing collective identity and generating solidarity.
期刊介绍:
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers.
Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.