An analytical model of two-cell tornadoes with emphasis on sharpness parameter affecting updrafts and a discussion on debris trajectory in outer cell

IF 4.2 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105862
Sanjay Kumar Pandey, Shruti
{"title":"An analytical model of two-cell tornadoes with emphasis on sharpness parameter affecting updrafts and a discussion on debris trajectory in outer cell","authors":"Sanjay Kumar Pandey,&nbsp;Shruti","doi":"10.1016/j.jweia.2024.105862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The present model on two-cell tornadoes generalizes the one-cell model of Baker and Sterling (2017) by introducing a sharpness parameter. However, we model only the outer cell. The idea was derived from Vatistas et al. (1991) model which showed that larger values of the sharpness parameter increase the sharpness of azimuthal velocity near the periphery of maximum azimuthal velocity. This generalization brings about the cherished change, which helps better fit to tornado motion. Natural tornadoes can fit different values of the sharpness parameter, indicating the limitations of Baker and Sterling’s model. The fluid is considered Newtonian, incompressible, and non-viscous while the motion is steady. Major changes concerning the sharpness parameter are observed in the axial velocity component which behaves differently for one-cell and two-cell tornadoes in two cases, i.e., parameter less than one and parameter greater than or equal to one. A remarkable observation is that the strongest updraft shifts towards the periphery of the maximum radial velocity. Moreover, the radial profile of pressure difference at the reference height behaves quite differently for two-cell tornadoes. Furthermore, sharpness parameter affects the distance traveled by flying debris and the time taken by falling debris to reach the ground.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54752,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","volume":"253 ","pages":"Article 105862"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167610524002253","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The present model on two-cell tornadoes generalizes the one-cell model of Baker and Sterling (2017) by introducing a sharpness parameter. However, we model only the outer cell. The idea was derived from Vatistas et al. (1991) model which showed that larger values of the sharpness parameter increase the sharpness of azimuthal velocity near the periphery of maximum azimuthal velocity. This generalization brings about the cherished change, which helps better fit to tornado motion. Natural tornadoes can fit different values of the sharpness parameter, indicating the limitations of Baker and Sterling’s model. The fluid is considered Newtonian, incompressible, and non-viscous while the motion is steady. Major changes concerning the sharpness parameter are observed in the axial velocity component which behaves differently for one-cell and two-cell tornadoes in two cases, i.e., parameter less than one and parameter greater than or equal to one. A remarkable observation is that the strongest updraft shifts towards the periphery of the maximum radial velocity. Moreover, the radial profile of pressure difference at the reference height behaves quite differently for two-cell tornadoes. Furthermore, sharpness parameter affects the distance traveled by flying debris and the time taken by falling debris to reach the ground.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双胞龙卷风的分析模型,重点是影响上升气流的锐度参数,以及对外胞中碎片轨迹的讨论
本模型是对 Baker 和 Sterling(2017 年)的单胞龙卷风模型的概括,引入了一个尖锐度参数。不过,我们只对外层细胞进行建模。这一想法源于 Vatistas 等人(1991 年)的模型,该模型表明,锐度参数值越大,最大方位角速度外围附近的方位角速度锐度就越大。这种概括带来了值得珍视的变化,有助于更好地拟合龙卷风运动。自然龙卷风可以适应不同的尖锐度参数值,这表明贝克和斯特林模型的局限性。流体被认为是牛顿、不可压缩和非粘性的,同时运动是稳定的。在两种情况下,即参数小于 1 和参数大于或等于 1 时,单细胞龙卷风和双细胞龙卷风的轴向速度分量表现不同。一个值得注意的现象是,最强的上升气流向最大径向速度的外围移动。此外,参考高度处的压力差径向剖面在双气室龙卷风中的表现也大不相同。此外,尖锐度参数会影响飞行碎片的飞行距离和下落碎片到达地面所需的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
22.90%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4.4 months
期刊介绍: The objective of the journal is to provide a means for the publication and interchange of information, on an international basis, on all those aspects of wind engineering that are included in the activities of the International Association for Wind Engineering http://www.iawe.org/. These are: social and economic impact of wind effects; wind characteristics and structure, local wind environments, wind loads and structural response, diffusion, pollutant dispersion and matter transport, wind effects on building heat loss and ventilation, wind effects on transport systems, aerodynamic aspects of wind energy generation, and codification of wind effects. Papers on these subjects describing full-scale measurements, wind-tunnel simulation studies, computational or theoretical methods are published, as well as papers dealing with the development of techniques and apparatus for wind engineering experiments.
期刊最新文献
Experimental study on wind-induced vibration and aerodynamic interference effects of flexible photovoltaics Calibration of pressures measured via tubing systems: Accounting for laboratory environmental variations between tubing response measurement and wind tunnel testing Full-scale experimental investigation of wind loading on ballasted photovoltaic arrays mounted on flat roofs Alleviating tunnel aerodynamics through hybrid suction & blowing techniques applied to train nose sections Non-Gaussian non-stationary wind speed simulation based on time-varying autoregressive model and maximum entropy method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1