A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society

Ana-Maria Bliuc, John M. Betts, Matteo Vergani, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Mioara Cristea
{"title":"A theoretical framework for polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society","authors":"Ana-Maria Bliuc, John M. Betts, Matteo Vergani, Ayoub Bouguettaya, Mioara Cristea","doi":"10.1038/s44271-024-00125-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We propose a framework integrating insights from computational social science, political, and social psychology to explain how extreme polarization can occur in deeply divided societies. Extreme polarization in a society emerges through a dynamic and complex process where societal, group, and individual factors interact. Dissent at different levels of analysis represents the driver of this process, where societal-level ideological dissent divides society into opposing camps, each with contrasting collective narratives. Within these opposing camps, further dissent leads to the formation of splinter factions and radical cells—sub-groups with increasingly extreme views. At the group level, collective narratives underpinning group identity become more extreme as society fragments. At the individual level, this process involves the internalization of an extreme group narrative and norms sanctioning radical behavior. The intense bonding within these groups and the convergence of personal and group identities through identity fusion increase the likelihood of radical group behavior. A theoretical framework informed by computational social science and social psychology explains the process of polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society.","PeriodicalId":501698,"journal":{"name":"Communications Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00125-1.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communications Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s44271-024-00125-1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a framework integrating insights from computational social science, political, and social psychology to explain how extreme polarization can occur in deeply divided societies. Extreme polarization in a society emerges through a dynamic and complex process where societal, group, and individual factors interact. Dissent at different levels of analysis represents the driver of this process, where societal-level ideological dissent divides society into opposing camps, each with contrasting collective narratives. Within these opposing camps, further dissent leads to the formation of splinter factions and radical cells—sub-groups with increasingly extreme views. At the group level, collective narratives underpinning group identity become more extreme as society fragments. At the individual level, this process involves the internalization of an extreme group narrative and norms sanctioning radical behavior. The intense bonding within these groups and the convergence of personal and group identities through identity fusion increase the likelihood of radical group behavior. A theoretical framework informed by computational social science and social psychology explains the process of polarization as the gradual fragmentation of a divided society.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两极分化是分裂社会逐渐分裂的理论框架
我们提出了一个整合了计算社会科学、政治学和社会心理学见解的框架,以解释极端两极分化是如何在严重分裂的社会中出现的。社会中的极端两极分化是在社会、群体和个人因素相互作用的动态复杂过程中产生的。社会层面的意识形态分歧将社会划分为对立的阵营,每个阵营都有截然不同的集体叙事。在这些对立阵营中,进一步的异议会导致分裂派别和激进细胞--观点越来越极端的子群体--的形成。在群体层面,随着社会的分裂,支撑群体身份的集体叙事也变得更加极端。在个人层面,这一过程涉及极端群体叙事和认可激进行为的规范的内化。这些群体内部的紧密联系以及通过身份融合实现的个人身份与群体身份的趋同增加了激进群体行为的可能性。以计算社会科学和社会心理学为基础的理论框架将两极分化的过程解释为分裂社会的逐渐分裂。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A dissociation between the use of implicit and explicit priors in perceptual inference. Adaptive empathic response selection is sensitive to multiple dimensions of social interaction. Parent-child relationship quality predicts higher subjective well-being in adulthood across a diverse group of countries Sensory stimulation enhances visual working memory capacity Psychoacoustic and Archeoacoustic nature of ancient Aztec skull whistles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1