Global misinformation trends: Commonalities and differences in topics, sources of falsehoods, and deception strategies across eight countries

IF 4.5 1区 文学 Q1 COMMUNICATION New Media & Society Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1177/14614448241268896
Regina Cazzamatta
{"title":"Global misinformation trends: Commonalities and differences in topics, sources of falsehoods, and deception strategies across eight countries","authors":"Regina Cazzamatta","doi":"10.1177/14614448241268896","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In a quantitative content analysis of 3,154 debunking articles from 23 fact-checking organizations, this study examines global misinformation trends and regional nuances across eight countries in Europe and Latin America (UK, DE, PT, SP, AR, BR, CL, and VZ). It strives to elucidate commonalities and differences based on political and media system indicators. Notably, countries with a substantial online presence of far-right parties avoid disclosing (fake) ordinary accounts to evade engaging in inauthentic coordinated actions. While entirely fabricated stories are infrequent, they stand out in Brazil and Spain, the two countries with higher political polarization. Despite variations, aggregated forms of fabrication (invented, manipulated, imposter, or decontextualized content) are more prominent in Latin America due to high social media use for news and low reliance on public media. Conversely, in Europe, countries are more impacted by misleading (cherry-picked, exaggerated, and twisted) information.","PeriodicalId":19149,"journal":{"name":"New Media & Society","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Media & Society","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448241268896","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In a quantitative content analysis of 3,154 debunking articles from 23 fact-checking organizations, this study examines global misinformation trends and regional nuances across eight countries in Europe and Latin America (UK, DE, PT, SP, AR, BR, CL, and VZ). It strives to elucidate commonalities and differences based on political and media system indicators. Notably, countries with a substantial online presence of far-right parties avoid disclosing (fake) ordinary accounts to evade engaging in inauthentic coordinated actions. While entirely fabricated stories are infrequent, they stand out in Brazil and Spain, the two countries with higher political polarization. Despite variations, aggregated forms of fabrication (invented, manipulated, imposter, or decontextualized content) are more prominent in Latin America due to high social media use for news and low reliance on public media. Conversely, in Europe, countries are more impacted by misleading (cherry-picked, exaggerated, and twisted) information.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
全球错误信息趋势:八个国家在主题、虚假信息来源和欺骗策略方面的共性和差异
本研究通过对 23 家事实核查机构的 3,154 篇揭露文章进行定量内容分析,探讨了全球误导信息的发展趋势以及欧洲和拉丁美洲八个国家(英国、德国、波兰、西班牙、亚美尼亚、巴西、智利和瓦努阿图)的地区性细微差别。它致力于根据政治和媒体系统指标阐明共同点和差异。值得注意的是,极右翼政党在网络上有大量存在的国家避免公开(虚假的)普通账户,以避免参与不真实的协调行动。虽然完全捏造的故事并不常见,但在巴西和西班牙这两个政治极化程度较高的国家却很突出。尽管存在差异,但在拉丁美洲,由于社交媒体的新闻使用率较高,而对公共媒体的依赖程度较低,聚合形式的捏造(编造、操纵、冒名顶替或断章取义的内容)更为突出。相反,在欧洲,误导性信息(偷梁换柱、夸大其词、歪曲事实)对各国的影响更大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
New Media & Society
New Media & Society COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
274
期刊介绍: New Media & Society engages in critical discussions of the key issues arising from the scale and speed of new media development, drawing on a wide range of disciplinary perspectives and on both theoretical and empirical research. The journal includes contributions on: -the individual and the social, the cultural and the political dimensions of new media -the global and local dimensions of the relationship between media and social change -contemporary as well as historical developments -the implications and impacts of, as well as the determinants and obstacles to, media change the relationship between theory, policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
The dual impact of social media on Asian Americans’ racial identity and resilience during the COVID-19 pandemic Pathways to persuasion: The impact of social media influencers’ self-disclosure and follower size on persuasion outcomes Hip-hop music producers’ labour in the digital music economy: Self-promotion, social media and platform gatekeeping What does it mean to “do your own research?” A comparative content analysis of DYOR messages in Instagram and Facebook posts about reproductive health, food, and vaccines Active bystanders in the forwarding of sexting messages: Applying a theory of planned behavior in youth
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1