Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Survival in Patients with Heart Failure and Significant Valvular Heart Disease.

IF 6.3 2区 医学 Q1 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1002/cpt.3417
Donna Shu-Han Lin, Ying-Ting Chao, Shu-Lin Chuang, Jen-Kuang Lee, Ting-Tse Lin, Lung-Chun Lin, Kuan-Chih Huang, Juey-Jen Hwang
{"title":"Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Survival in Patients with Heart Failure and Significant Valvular Heart Disease.","authors":"Donna Shu-Han Lin, Ying-Ting Chao, Shu-Lin Chuang, Jen-Kuang Lee, Ting-Tse Lin, Lung-Chun Lin, Kuan-Chih Huang, Juey-Jen Hwang","doi":"10.1002/cpt.3417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Although the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established, patients with hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) were excluded from pivotal trials. We aimed to assess the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on survival in patients with HFrEF and concomitant significant MR. All patients from a single center who underwent echocardiography between June 2008 and December 2020, with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 40% and hemodynamically significant MR were recruited. Patients were categorized according to drug use and year of the index echocardiogram into the angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), non-ARNI before 2017, and non-ARNI after 2017 groups. Patients in the ARNI and non-ARNI after 2017 groups were compared directly, whereas patients in the non-ARNI before 2017 group were matched to the ARNI group in a 3:1 ratio. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Death was compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. After exclusion by criteria and matching, there remained 610 patients in the ARNI group, 434 in the non-ARNI after 2017 group, and 1,722 in the non-ARNI before 2017 group. During follow-up, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ARNI group compared with both non-ARNI after 2017 and non-ARNI before 2017 groups. Multivariate analysis of both pairs of comparison between groups found the use of ARNI to be significantly associated with increased survival. In patients with HFrEF and concomitant significant MR, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower risks of all-cause death.</p>","PeriodicalId":153,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cpt.3417","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Although the benefits of sacubitril/valsartan in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) are well established, patients with hemodynamically significant mitral regurgitation (MR) were excluded from pivotal trials. We aimed to assess the effects of sacubitril/valsartan on survival in patients with HFrEF and concomitant significant MR. All patients from a single center who underwent echocardiography between June 2008 and December 2020, with a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of less than 40% and hemodynamically significant MR were recruited. Patients were categorized according to drug use and year of the index echocardiogram into the angiotensin receptor/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI), non-ARNI before 2017, and non-ARNI after 2017 groups. Patients in the ARNI and non-ARNI after 2017 groups were compared directly, whereas patients in the non-ARNI before 2017 group were matched to the ARNI group in a 3:1 ratio. The outcome of interest was all-cause mortality. Death was compared between the groups using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models. After exclusion by criteria and matching, there remained 610 patients in the ARNI group, 434 in the non-ARNI after 2017 group, and 1,722 in the non-ARNI before 2017 group. During follow-up, all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the ARNI group compared with both non-ARNI after 2017 and non-ARNI before 2017 groups. Multivariate analysis of both pairs of comparison between groups found the use of ARNI to be significantly associated with increased survival. In patients with HFrEF and concomitant significant MR, treatment with sacubitril/valsartan was associated with lower risks of all-cause death.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨库比特利/缬沙坦对心力衰竭合并严重瓣膜性心脏病患者生存期的影响
尽管沙库比特利/缬沙坦对射血分数降低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)的疗效已得到公认,但有明显二尖瓣反流(MR)的患者却被排除在关键试验之外。我们旨在评估沙库比特利/缬沙坦对射血分数减低型心力衰竭并伴有明显二尖瓣反流患者生存期的影响。我们招募了在 2008 年 6 月至 2020 年 12 月期间接受超声心动图检查、左心室射血分数(LVEF)小于 40% 并伴有血流动力学显著 MR 的单个中心的所有患者。根据药物使用情况和索引超声心动图的年份将患者分为血管紧张素受体/肾素抑制剂(ARNI)组、2017 年前非 ARNI 组和 2017 年后非 ARNI 组。ARNI组和2017年后非ARNI组患者直接进行比较,而2017年前非ARNI组患者则按3:1的比例与ARNI组进行匹配。关注的结果是全因死亡率。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例危险模型对各组之间的死亡情况进行比较。按标准和配对排除后,ARNI 组仍有 610 名患者,2017 年后非 ARNI 组有 434 名患者,2017 年前非 ARNI 组有 1722 名患者。在随访期间,ARNI 组的全因死亡率明显低于 2017 年后非 ARNI 组和 2017 年前非 ARNI 组。对两组间的对比进行多变量分析后发现,使用ARNI与生存率的提高有显著相关性。在高频低氧血症(HFrEF)和伴有明显 MR 的患者中,使用沙库比妥/缬沙坦治疗与较低的全因死亡风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
7.50%
发文量
290
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (CPT) is the authoritative cross-disciplinary journal in experimental and clinical medicine devoted to publishing advances in the nature, action, efficacy, and evaluation of therapeutics. CPT welcomes original Articles in the emerging areas of translational, predictive and personalized medicine; new therapeutic modalities including gene and cell therapies; pharmacogenomics, proteomics and metabolomics; bioinformation and applied systems biology complementing areas of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, human investigation and clinical trials, pharmacovigilence, pharmacoepidemiology, pharmacometrics, and population pharmacology.
期刊最新文献
Effects of Cimetidine and Dolutegravir on the Endogenous Drug-Drug Interaction Biomarkers for Organic Cation Transporter 2 and Multidrug and Toxin Extrusion Protein 1 in Healthy Volunteers. Correction to Beyond MABEL: An Integrative Approach to First in Human Dose Selection of Immunomodulators by the Health and Environmental Sciences Institute (HESI) Immuno-Safety Technical Committee (ITC). Real-World Effectiveness of All-Oral Direct-Acting Antivirals in Patients With Hepatitis C Virus-Related HCC. Sex-Dependent Effects of CYP2D6 on the Pharmacokinetics of Berberine in Humans. Model-Informed Approach to Recommend Burosumab Dosing Regimens for Pediatric and Adult Patients With the Ultrarare Disease Tumor-Induced Osteomalacia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1