Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics最新文献

There is accumulating evidence that cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) concentrations of nimodipine correlate with long-term outcome of patients after subarachnoidal hemorrhage (aSAH) by impeding cerebral ischemia. However, pharmacological data on simultaneous serum vs. CSF and intraparenchymal nimodipine values are rarely reported in larger patient groups. Nimodipine concentrations were determined in plasma, CSF, and cerebral interstitial fluid (ISF), at steady state after oral (6 × 60 mg/day) and intravenous (0.5, 1, 1.5 and 2 mg/h) administrations in 10 patients after aSAH. Area under the concentration time curve (AUC_0-24) for intravenous nimodipine was highest at an infusion rate of 2 mg/h in plasma (1335.87 ± 591.09 mg*h/L), followed by CSF (39.53 ± 23.07 mg*h/L), resulting in an overall CSF penetration ratio of 3.8% (±1.5) (AUC_CSF/AUC_plasma). In contrast, nimodipine levels were significantly lower in both plasma (AUC_0-24 298.32 ± 206.52 mg*h/L) and CSF (AUC_0-24 34.8 ± 16.56 mg*h/L) after oral administration. In cerebral ISF, low amounts of nimodipine were detectable in only 4 patients at an infusion rate of 1.5 and 2 mg/h as well as following oral administration. We found significantly higher CSF nimodipine levels in patients during intravenous compared to oral administration. In contrast, only low amounts of nimodipine were detected in the ISF after both oral and intravenous administration. Our findings strongly suggest that the main clinical nimodipine effect of impeding life threatening cerebral ischemia is mediated through significant higher CSF levels after intravenous administration, more likely effective than oral administration.

Evidence of the effectiveness of β-blockers in heart failure (HF) and atrial fibrillation (AF) in a contemporary cohort is controversial. This study investigated the association between the use of β-blockers and prognosis in hospitalized HF patients with and without AF in Japan. Patients hospitalized with the first episode of acute HF were identified from the National Database of Health Insurance Claims and Specific Health Checkups of Japan between April 2014 and March 2021. Associations of β-blocker use and prognosis were compared by propensity score matching among the AF or non-AF group. A mixed-effects survival model was used, and hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. Among 428,650 patients discharged with HF in 4,433 hospitals, 175,174 (40.9%) were ≥ 85 years old, 151,873 (35.4%) had complicated AF, and 236,457 (55.2%) were β-blocker users. In a matched AF group, β-blocker use was associated with a lower composite outcome of all-cause mortality or HF rehospitalization (HR [95% CI], 0.95 [0.93-0.97]). A similar result was obtained in a matched non-AF group (0.95 [0.94-0.96]). In addition, the HRs in patients aged ≥ 85 years and female patients were 1.00 [0.98-1.02] and 1.01 [0.98-1.03] in the AF group and 1.03 [1.01-1.05] and 0.98 [0.97-1.00] in the non-AF group, respectively. The favorable prognostic associations of β-blocker use were observed regardless of AF in patients across a broad spectrum of HF in a superaged society.

In patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), infections represent a significant concern, particularly given the immunomodulatory effects of disease-modifying agents (DMAs). High-efficacy DMAs (heDMAs) play a pivotal role in delaying MS progression, yet their use also raises concerns regarding the risk of infection. This study aimed to compare the infection risk with the use of heDMA and moderate-efficacy disease-modifying agents (meDMAs) in MS patients. This retrospective cohort study involved adult (18-64 years) MS patients with incident DMA use based on the 2015-2019 MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters Database. Patients initiating heDMAs (natalizumab, alemtuzumab, and ocrelizumab) or meDMAs (interferon beta-1a, interferon beta-1b, fingolimod, teriflunomide, dimethyl fumarate, and glatiramer acetate) were included. The outcomes of interest were comparative risk of overall infection, serious infection, and frequently reported types of infection. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) were estimated in inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) based on Cox proportional hazard models. Among 10,003 eligible incident DMA users, 22.92% of patients initiated heDMAs. The IPTW-CPH model revealed that patients with heDMAs were associated with a higher risk of serious infection (aHR: 1.24, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.06-1.44) and urinary tract infection (UTI; aHR: 1.21, 95% CI: 1.14-1.30). Sensitivity analyses with different follow-up periods yielded consistent findings with the main analyses. In MS, heDMAs were associated with a greater risk of serious infection and UTI compared with meDMAs. These findings suggest the need to carefully monitor and manage the infection risk to optimize the use of heDMAs in MS.

Sacituzumab govitecan (SG), a Trop-2-directed antibody-drug conjugate, is approved for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (mTNBC) who received ≥2 prior systemic therapies (≥1 in metastatic setting). Exposure-response (E-R) relationships between SG exposure and efficacy and safety outcomes were characterized in 277 patients with mTNBC using data from the phase I/II IMMU-132-01 and phase III ASCENT (IMMU-132-05) studies. Evaluated endpoints included complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety endpoints (individual first worst grade of select adverse events (AEs)). E-R analyses were also conducted for time to first dose reduction or delay. Patients received SG at 8 or 10 mg/kg intravenously on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. Average SG-related serum exposure over the treatment duration (until the event) was consistently the most significant exposure metric correlated with efficacy and safety endpoints. Higher average concentration over the treatment duration for SG (CAVG_SG) was the best predictor of CR and ORR. The model-predicted proportions of patients with CR and ORR at 10 mg/kg were 4.26% and 32.6%, respectively. Higher CAVG for total antibody was the best predictor of OS and PFS. The model-predicted probability of OS at 12 months at median lactate dehydrogenase (227 IU/L) was 53%. The probability of grade ≥1 evaluated AEs and the risk of dose reductions and delays significantly increased with increasing CAVG_SG. The model-predicted proportions of patients with any-grade AEs were 35.9%, 67.4%, 64.7%, and 67.1% for vomiting, diarrhea, nausea, and neutropenia, respectively (10 mg/kg dose group). Neutropenia was the only evaluated AE for which CAVG_SG was significantly associated with grade ≥3 events. The clinically meaningful efficacy and manageable safety achieved with SG 10 mg/kg on days 1 and 8 of every 21-day cycle dosing regimen supports the appropriateness of this clinical dosage in patients with mTNBC.

Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor (SNRI), and norepinephrine-dopamine reuptake inhibitor (NRI) antidepressants can cause hyponatremia through syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion (SIADH). This study assesses the differential risks of hyponatremia associated with commonly prescribed SSRIs (fluoxetine, paroxetine, sertraline, citalopram, escitalopram), SNRIs (duloxetine, venlafaxine) and NRI (bupropion), as well as omeprazole as a reference, with a retrospective observational cohort study in the All of Us Research Program, a national multicenter research cohort containing de-identified electronic health records (EHR). Participants who had been prescribed monotherapy with any of eight common antidepressants were included, with each drug considered as a separate arm indexed with a start date. Events were defined as the first occurrence of a low plasma sodium measurement or a clinical diagnosis recorded for either hyponatremia or SIADH. Those who did not have events were censored at their last plasma sodium measurement. A total of 17,439 individuals were exposed to one of the eight antidepressants as monotherapy. The overall incidences for hyponatremia were 0.87% in the first 30 days and 10.5% in the first 3 years in the antidepressant arms. Compared to sertraline, duloxetine (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.37 [1.19-1.58]) and escitalopram (HR = 1.16 [1.01-1.33]) were associated with the highest overall risk of hyponatremia, and bupropion (HR = 0.83 [0.73-0.94]) and paroxetine (HR = 0.78 [0.65-0.93]) were associated with the lowest risk. The risks were unchanged after adjusting for comorbidity and polypharmacy. Such information could help guide providers in managing patients and their risks of hyponatremia when on common antidepressants.

Dexamethasone (DEX) is currently the treatment of choice for patients with oxygen-dependent COVID-19. It has been observed, primarily in vitro, that dexamethasone induces the expression of CYP3A and the ABCB1 gene, which encodes P-glycoprotein (P-gp). This has raised concerns about potential interactions between DEX and substrates of CYP3A and P-gp, such as direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC). Currently, there is limited robust evidence to support a clinically significant interaction between DEX and DOAC. Using physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling (PBPK), we investigated the impact of DEX administered in the context of SARS-CoV-2 infection on the pharmacokinetics of apixaban (APX) and rivaroxaban (RVX). After validating the induction effect of the DEX compound on two CYP3A4 substrates using the limited available studies, we optimized the compound in a COVID-19 patient population, where significantly higher DEX plasma concentrations were observed compared to healthy volunteers. Our PBPK-based PK simulations showed a 20% decrease in the AUC of APX and RVX in a worst-case scenario and when DEX was administered at 6 mg PO for 10 days. This finding confirms the limited clinical data currently available and supports the use of APX and RVX with DEX in COVID-19 patients at low-risk for thrombo-embolism. In addition, our results suggest that prednisone (PRED), when used at an equipotent dose, could serve as a viable alternative to DEX, given its less pronounced induction effect on APX and RVX. Further research is needed to validate these findings and to explore the clinical implications of using PRED in place of DEX in such scenarios.

There is a scarcity of information related to the financial impact of acute kidney injury (AKI), and even more so the economics of drug-associated AKI (D-AKI). Our goal was to provide a comprehensive summary of the economic burden of D-AKI by evaluating the costs of D-AKI compared to not developing AKI and cost savings associated with nephrotoxin stewardship approaches. Following the PRISMA guidelines, a literature search was conducted using PubMed to identify articles from database inception through November 2023. The main outcomes included AKI incidence, resource use, and cost of nephrotoxin stewardship programs/D-AKI event or no event. Key findings were summarized based on whether the study compared the cost of D-AKI vs. no AKI or identified potential cost savings associated with a nephrotoxin stewardship method to prevent D-AKI or worsening D-AKI. All costs were adjusted to USD2023. Twenty-five studies met the inclusion criteria. Eight studies compared the cost of D-AKI to no AKI. Total admission costs of patients who developed D-AKI ranged from $47,696 to $173,569. Nineteen studies implemented nephrotoxin stewardship with 12 substituting a less nephrotoxic drug; five using therapeutic drug monitoring and two altering drug dosing to limit exposure. Overall, these prevention strategies ranged from $5,171 to $364,973 in total medical cost savings and $17 to $942 in total cost savings per patient-day. The in-hospital economic impact of D-AKI is substantial. Implementing nephrotoxin stewardship strategies to reduce D-AKI is associated with cost savings. Institutions should adopt strategic and efficient nephrotoxin stewardship programs to optimize patient care and reduce costs.