Effectiveness and predictors of psychotherapy in eating disorders: state-of-the-art and future directions.

IF 7.5 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY Current Opinion in Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000961
Alessio Maria Monteleone, Giovanni Abbate-Daga
{"title":"Effectiveness and predictors of psychotherapy in eating disorders: state-of-the-art and future directions.","authors":"Alessio Maria Monteleone, Giovanni Abbate-Daga","doi":"10.1097/YCO.0000000000000961","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Psychotherapy is the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary treatment approach for eating disorders. This review examines recent evidence regarding effectiveness, predictors, and mechanisms of change of psychotherapy in eating disorders, providing a road map for clinicians and researchers.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Family-based treatments (FBT) are effective in adolescents with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Evidence-based psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa have no evidence of superiority compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in adults with anorexia nervosa. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the first-choice psychotherapy recommended for adults with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder (BED). Self-help interventions have some evidence of effectiveness in nonunderweight individuals with eating disorders. Early symptom improvement and adolescent age predict more favourable outcomes.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Evidence-based psychotherapies can be suggested for eating disorders, although follow-up data are needed. Beyond anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and BED, there is no evidence of psychotherapy effectiveness in other eating disorders. The effectiveness of novel (e.g. 'third-wave') psychotherapies, treatment delivery modality (e.g. internet-delivered), and adjunctive interventions (e.g. virtual reality) needs to be further explored. A broader definition of recovery is recommended, including behavioural, physical, and psychological criteria. Predictors and mechanisms of changes have not been studied enough: quantitative and qualitative studies are needed to promote more tailored and individualized psychotherapy interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":11022,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000961","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Psychotherapy is the cornerstone of the multidisciplinary treatment approach for eating disorders. This review examines recent evidence regarding effectiveness, predictors, and mechanisms of change of psychotherapy in eating disorders, providing a road map for clinicians and researchers.

Recent findings: Family-based treatments (FBT) are effective in adolescents with anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa. Evidence-based psychotherapies for anorexia nervosa have no evidence of superiority compared with treatment as usual (TAU) in adults with anorexia nervosa. Cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) is the first-choice psychotherapy recommended for adults with bulimia nervosa and binge-eating disorder (BED). Self-help interventions have some evidence of effectiveness in nonunderweight individuals with eating disorders. Early symptom improvement and adolescent age predict more favourable outcomes.

Summary: Evidence-based psychotherapies can be suggested for eating disorders, although follow-up data are needed. Beyond anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, and BED, there is no evidence of psychotherapy effectiveness in other eating disorders. The effectiveness of novel (e.g. 'third-wave') psychotherapies, treatment delivery modality (e.g. internet-delivered), and adjunctive interventions (e.g. virtual reality) needs to be further explored. A broader definition of recovery is recommended, including behavioural, physical, and psychological criteria. Predictors and mechanisms of changes have not been studied enough: quantitative and qualitative studies are needed to promote more tailored and individualized psychotherapy interventions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮食失调症心理治疗的效果和预测因素:最新进展和未来方向。
审查目的:心理治疗是饮食失调症多学科治疗方法的基石。本综述研究了有关饮食失调症心理疗法的有效性、预测因素和改变机制的最新证据,为临床医生和研究人员提供了路线图:基于家庭的治疗(FBT)对患有神经性厌食症和神经性贪食症的青少年有效。在成人厌食症患者中,基于证据的厌食症心理疗法与常规疗法(TAU)相比没有优越性的证据。认知行为疗法(CBT)是推荐用于神经性贪食症和暴饮暴食症(BED)成人患者的首选心理疗法。有证据表明,自助干预对非体重过轻的进食障碍患者有效。早期症状改善和青少年年龄预示着更有利的结果。小结:可以建议对进食障碍采用循证心理疗法,但需要后续数据。除了神经性厌食症、神经性贪食症和BED之外,还没有证据表明心理疗法对其他饮食失调症有效。新型(如 "第三波")心理疗法、治疗方式(如互联网)和辅助干预(如虚拟现实)的有效性有待进一步探讨。建议对康复进行更广泛的定义,包括行为、身体和心理标准。对变化的预测因素和机制的研究还不够:需要进行定量和定性研究,以促进更有针对性和个性化的心理治疗干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Psychiatry
Current Opinion in Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
76
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Current Opinion in Psychiatry is an easy-to-digest bimonthly journal covering the most interesting and important advances in the field of psychiatry. Eight sections on mental health disorders including schizophrenia, neurodevelopmental disorders and eating disorders, are presented alongside five area-specific sections, offering an expert evaluation on the most exciting developments in the field.
期刊最新文献
Treatment escalation for people with anorexia nervosa: setting, therapies and nutritional interventions. A narrative review of community-based dementia care in India: experiences, challenges, and policy initiatives. End of life care for people with dementia and comorbid cancer: recent studies and research gaps. GLP-1 receptor agonists and weight loss in schizophrenia - past, present, and future. Psychotropic drugs, eating behaviour and weight gain.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1