Carbohydrate quality indices and lung cancer risk: a case-control study from Iran.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY European Journal of Cancer Prevention Pub Date : 2024-07-31 DOI:10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000913
Milad Mohammadzadeh, Fatemeh Abdi, Melika Mamaghanian, Amin Paydareh, Alireza Bahrami, Zahra Sheikhi, Ehsan Hejazi
{"title":"Carbohydrate quality indices and lung cancer risk: a case-control study from Iran.","authors":"Milad Mohammadzadeh, Fatemeh Abdi, Melika Mamaghanian, Amin Paydareh, Alireza Bahrami, Zahra Sheikhi, Ehsan Hejazi","doi":"10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000913","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Considering that carbohydrates play an important role in supplying the body with energy and exhibit diverse mechanisms that can either prevent or stimulate cancer, we hypothesize that the quality of carbohydrate intake may be associated with cancer risk, including lung cancer. This hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 135 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients, and 237 healthy age- and sex-matched hospitalized controls. We used a valid and reliable 148-item Food Frequency Questionnaire to collect the dietary intake of subjects. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between carbohydrate quality indices and the odds of lung cancer. After adjustment for confounding variables, the high glycemic index appears to be an increased risk factor for lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-4.91]. No statistically significant association was found between glycemic load and lung cancer (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 0.98-6.43). In contrast, the carbohydrate quality index (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11-0.48) and low-carbohydrate diet score (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08-0.36), were associated with a decrease in the risk of lung cancer. In summary, our study showed that a high glycemic index is a risk factor for lung cancer, however carbohydrate quality index and low-carbohydrate diet score is a dietary approach to reduce the risk of lung cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":11830,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Cancer Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CEJ.0000000000000913","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering that carbohydrates play an important role in supplying the body with energy and exhibit diverse mechanisms that can either prevent or stimulate cancer, we hypothesize that the quality of carbohydrate intake may be associated with cancer risk, including lung cancer. This hospital-based case-control study was conducted on 135 newly diagnosed lung cancer patients, and 237 healthy age- and sex-matched hospitalized controls. We used a valid and reliable 148-item Food Frequency Questionnaire to collect the dietary intake of subjects. Multivariate logistic regression was used to estimate the association between carbohydrate quality indices and the odds of lung cancer. After adjustment for confounding variables, the high glycemic index appears to be an increased risk factor for lung cancer [odds ratio (OR) = 2.51, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.28-4.91]. No statistically significant association was found between glycemic load and lung cancer (OR = 2.51, 95% CI: 0.98-6.43). In contrast, the carbohydrate quality index (OR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11-0.48) and low-carbohydrate diet score (OR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.08-0.36), were associated with a decrease in the risk of lung cancer. In summary, our study showed that a high glycemic index is a risk factor for lung cancer, however carbohydrate quality index and low-carbohydrate diet score is a dietary approach to reduce the risk of lung cancer.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
碳水化合物质量指数与肺癌风险:一项来自伊朗的病例对照研究。
考虑到碳水化合物在为人体提供能量方面发挥着重要作用,并表现出多种可预防或刺激癌症的机制,我们假设碳水化合物摄入的质量可能与癌症风险(包括肺癌)有关。这项以医院为基础的病例对照研究针对 135 名新确诊的肺癌患者和 237 名年龄和性别匹配的健康住院对照者。我们使用了有效可靠的 148 项食物频率问卷来收集受试者的饮食摄入量。我们采用多元逻辑回归法估算了碳水化合物质量指数与肺癌发病几率之间的关系。在对混杂变量进行调整后,高血糖生成指数似乎是增加肺癌风险的因素[几率比(OR)= 2.51,95% 置信区间(CI):1.28-4.91]。血糖负荷与肺癌之间没有统计学意义上的关联(OR = 2.51,95% CI:0.98-6.43)。相反,碳水化合物质量指数(OR = 0.23,95% CI:0.11-0.48)和低碳水化合物饮食评分(OR = 0.17,95% CI:0.08-0.36)与肺癌风险的降低有关。总之,我们的研究表明,高血糖生成指数是肺癌的危险因素,而碳水化合物质量指数和低碳水化合物饮食评分是降低肺癌风险的饮食方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
96
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: European Journal of Cancer Prevention aims to promote an increased awareness of all aspects of cancer prevention and to stimulate new ideas and innovations. The Journal has a wide-ranging scope, covering such aspects as descriptive and metabolic epidemiology, histopathology, genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology, microbiology, clinical medicine, intervention trials and public education, basic laboratory studies and special group studies. Although affiliated to a European organization, the journal addresses issues of international importance.
期刊最新文献
Impact of colorectal cancer screening by primary tumor location in a real-world setting in Japan. Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and prognostic factors of patients with second primary triple-negative breast cancer: a study based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Marital status as an independent prognostic factor for survival in women with vaginal cancer: evidence from the SEER database analysis. Use of stool DNA for colorectal cancer screening: a meta-analysis and systematic review. Long-term trends in the burden of breast cancer in China over three decades: a joinpoint regression and age-period-cohort analysis based on Global Burden of Disease 2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1