Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion-Facilitated Clearance of Residual Kidney Stone Fragments vs Observation.

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Journal of Urology Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000004186
Mathew D Sorensen, Barbrina Dunmire, Jeff Thiel, Bryan W Cunitz, Barbara H Burke, Branda J Levchak, Christina Popchoi, Arturo E Holmes, John C Kucewicz, M Kennedy Hall, Manjiri Dighe, Jessica C Dai, Fionnuala C Cormack, Ziyue Liu, Michael R Bailey, Michael P Porter, Jonathan D Harper
{"title":"Randomized Controlled Trial of Ultrasonic Propulsion-Facilitated Clearance of Residual Kidney Stone Fragments vs Observation.","authors":"Mathew D Sorensen, Barbrina Dunmire, Jeff Thiel, Bryan W Cunitz, Barbara H Burke, Branda J Levchak, Christina Popchoi, Arturo E Holmes, John C Kucewicz, M Kennedy Hall, Manjiri Dighe, Jessica C Dai, Fionnuala C Cormack, Ziyue Liu, Michael R Bailey, Michael P Porter, Jonathan D Harper","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigational procedure for awake patients. Our purpose was to evaluate whether ultrasonic propulsion to facilitate residual kidney stone fragment clearance reduced relapse.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial used single block randomization (1:1) without masking. Adults with residual fragments (individually ≤5 mm) were enrolled. Primary outcome was relapse as measured by stone growth, a stone-related urgent medical visit, or surgery by 5 years or study end. Secondary outcomes were fragment passage within 3 weeks and adverse events within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare the treatment (ultrasonic propulsion) and control (observation) groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The trial was conducted from May 9, 2015, through April 6, 2024. Median follow-up (interquartile range) was 3.0 (1.8-3.2) years. The treatment group (n = 40) had longer time to relapse than the control group (n = 42; <i>P</i> < .003). The restricted mean time-to-relapse was 52% longer in the treatment group than in the control group (1530 ± 92 days vs 1009 ± 118 days), and the risk of relapse was lower (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68) with 8 of 40 and 21 of 42 participants, respectively, experiencing relapse. Omitting 3 participants not asked about passage, 24 treatment (63%) and 2 control (5%) participants passed fragments within 3 weeks of treatment. adverse events were mild, transient, and self-resolving, and were reported in 25 treated participants (63%) and 17 controls (40%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasonic propulsion reduced relapse and added minimal risk.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration no.: </strong>NCT02028559.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"811-820"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11560600/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004186","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ultrasonic propulsion is an investigational procedure for awake patients. Our purpose was to evaluate whether ultrasonic propulsion to facilitate residual kidney stone fragment clearance reduced relapse.

Materials and methods: This multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized, controlled trial used single block randomization (1:1) without masking. Adults with residual fragments (individually ≤5 mm) were enrolled. Primary outcome was relapse as measured by stone growth, a stone-related urgent medical visit, or surgery by 5 years or study end. Secondary outcomes were fragment passage within 3 weeks and adverse events within 90 days. Cumulative incidence of relapse was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare the treatment (ultrasonic propulsion) and control (observation) groups.

Results: The trial was conducted from May 9, 2015, through April 6, 2024. Median follow-up (interquartile range) was 3.0 (1.8-3.2) years. The treatment group (n = 40) had longer time to relapse than the control group (n = 42; P < .003). The restricted mean time-to-relapse was 52% longer in the treatment group than in the control group (1530 ± 92 days vs 1009 ± 118 days), and the risk of relapse was lower (hazard ratio 0.30, 95% CI 0.13-0.68) with 8 of 40 and 21 of 42 participants, respectively, experiencing relapse. Omitting 3 participants not asked about passage, 24 treatment (63%) and 2 control (5%) participants passed fragments within 3 weeks of treatment. adverse events were mild, transient, and self-resolving, and were reported in 25 treated participants (63%) and 17 controls (40%).

Conclusions: Ultrasonic propulsion reduced relapse and added minimal risk.

Clinical trial registration no.: NCT02028559.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
超声波推动清除残留肾结石碎片与观察法的随机对照试验
目的:超声波推进术是一项针对清醒患者的研究性手术。我们的目的是评估用超声波推进术清除残留肾结石碎片是否能减少复发:这项多中心、前瞻性、开放标签、随机对照试验采用单块随机化(1:1),不加掩蔽。有残留结石碎片(单个小于 5 毫米)的成人参加了试验。主要结果是结石复发,具体表现为结石增大、结石相关的紧急就诊或 5 年或研究结束前的手术。次要结果是 3 周内碎石通过率和 90 天内不良事件发生率。采用 Kaplan-Meier 法估算复发的累积发生率。采用对数秩检验比较治疗组(超声波推进)和对照组(观察):试验从2015年5月9日开始,至2024年4月6日结束。随访中位数(四分位数间距)为 3.0(1.8-3.2)年。治疗组(n = 40)的复发时间长于对照组(n = 42;P < .003)。治疗组的限制性平均复发时间比对照组长 52%(1530 ± 92 天 vs 1009 ± 118 天),复发风险较低(危险比 0.30,95% CI 0.13-0.68),40 名参与者中有 8 人复发,42 名参与者中有 21 人复发。剔除3名未被问及通过情况的参与者,24名治疗参与者(63%)和2名对照组参与者(5%)在治疗后3周内通过了碎片。不良反应轻微、短暂且可自行缓解,25名治疗参与者(63%)和17名对照组参与者(40%)出现了不良反应:结论:超声波推进减少了复发,风险极低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Urology
Journal of Urology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
11.50
自引率
7.60%
发文量
3746
审稿时长
2-3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Official Journal of the American Urological Association (AUA), and the most widely read and highly cited journal in the field, The Journal of Urology® brings solid coverage of the clinically relevant content needed to stay at the forefront of the dynamic field of urology. This premier journal presents investigative studies on critical areas of research and practice, survey articles providing short condensations of the best and most important urology literature worldwide, and practice-oriented reports on significant clinical observations.
期刊最新文献
Urologic Oncology: Bladder, Penis, and Urethral Cancer, and Basic Principles of Oncology. Moving the Needle in Early-Stage Testicular Germ Cell Tumor Management: The MAGESTIC Trial. The Impact of Social Deprivation on Anterior Urethral Stricture Recurrence After Urethroplasty: A Trauma and Urologic Reconstructive Network of Surgeons Analysis. Exploring the Genetic Risk of Childhood Daytime Urinary Incontinence: A Genome-Wide Association Study. Postvasectomy Semen Analysis Compliance With Utilization of a Mail-In Semen Analysis Kit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1