Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-12DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004387
Jacob E Tallman, Emily A Vertosick, Syed M Alam, Fady J Baky, S Machele Donat, Eugene J Pietzak, Eugene K Cha, Timothy F Donahue, Bernard H Bochner, Andrew J Vickers, Alvin C Goh
Purpose: Ureteral stents are commonly placed intraoperatively during radical cystectomy, although their efficacy in reducing complications is unproven. We compared clinical outcomes among patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit (RARC-IC) with or without ureteral stents to determine if omission of ureteral stents affects postoperative complications.
Materials and methods: All RARC-IC surgeries performed at our institution between November 2017 and June 2023 were reviewed. Beginning August 2021, ureteral stents were routinely omitted. Primary outcome was ureteroenteric anastomosis complications (urine leak, UTI, abscess, and/or sepsis) within 30 and 90 days of RARC-IC. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound infections, urgent care center visits, inpatient readmissions, and ureteral stricture.
Results: Among 133 patients included, 90 patients (68%) received a ureteral stent and 43 (32%) did not. Composite ureteroenteric anastomosis complications were higher in the stented group (20% vs 9.5%, 10% difference, 95% CI, -3.4% to 24%, P = .2), though not statistically significant. The stented group had a significantly higher 30-day UTI rate (19% difference, 95% CI, 9.0%-29%, P = .007). The 30-day readmission rates were higher in the stented group, although differences did not meet statistical significance (19% vs 9.8%, 9.1% difference, 95% CI, -4.8% to 23%, P = .3). Limitations include lack of randomization and inability to evaluate some outcomes, including ureteral obstruction or strictures.
Conclusions: Omission of ureteral stent placement at RARC-IC is safe and feasible. Randomized trials are warranted to determine the effects of stents on risk of postoperative complications after RARC-IC.
目的:输尿管支架通常在根治性膀胱切除术术中放置,尽管其减少并发症的功效尚未得到证实。我们比较了机器人辅助根治性膀胱切除术(RARC-IC)伴输尿管支架或不伴输尿管支架的患者的临床结果,以确定输尿管支架是否会影响术后并发症。材料和方法:回顾2017年11月至2023年6月在我院进行的所有RARC-IC手术。从2021年8月开始,常规省略输尿管支架。主要结局是RARC-IC术后30天和90天内输尿管-肠吻合术(UEA)并发症(尿漏、尿路感染、脓肿和/或脓毒症)。次要结局包括伤口感染、急诊中心就诊、住院再入院和输尿管狭窄的发生率。结果:纳入的133例患者中,90例(68%)接受了输尿管支架,43例(32%)未接受。支架组复合UEA并发症较高(20% vs 9.5%,差异10%,95% CI, -3.4%-24%, p = 0.2),但无统计学意义。支架组30天UTI发生率显著高于支架组(差异19%,95% CI, 9.0%-29%, p = 0.007)。支架组30天再入院率较高,但差异无统计学意义(19% vs 9.8%,差异9.1%,95% CI, -4.8%-23%, p = 0.3)。局限性包括缺乏随机化和无法评估一些结果,包括输尿管梗阻或狭窄。结论:RARC-IC输尿管支架置入术是安全可行的。需要随机试验来确定支架对RARC-IC术后并发症风险的影响。
{"title":"Perioperative Complications and Omission of Ureteral Stents During Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy With Intracorporeal Ileal Conduit.","authors":"Jacob E Tallman, Emily A Vertosick, Syed M Alam, Fady J Baky, S Machele Donat, Eugene J Pietzak, Eugene K Cha, Timothy F Donahue, Bernard H Bochner, Andrew J Vickers, Alvin C Goh","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004387","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004387","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ureteral stents are commonly placed intraoperatively during radical cystectomy, although their efficacy in reducing complications is unproven. We compared clinical outcomes among patients undergoing robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal ileal conduit (RARC-IC) with or without ureteral stents to determine if omission of ureteral stents affects postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>All RARC-IC surgeries performed at our institution between November 2017 and June 2023 were reviewed. Beginning August 2021, ureteral stents were routinely omitted. Primary outcome was ureteroenteric anastomosis complications (urine leak, UTI, abscess, and/or sepsis) within 30 and 90 days of RARC-IC. Secondary outcomes included rates of wound infections, urgent care center visits, inpatient readmissions, and ureteral stricture.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 133 patients included, 90 patients (68%) received a ureteral stent and 43 (32%) did not. Composite ureteroenteric anastomosis complications were higher in the stented group (20% vs 9.5%, 10% difference, 95% CI, -3.4% to 24%, <i>P</i> = .2), though not statistically significant. The stented group had a significantly higher 30-day UTI rate (19% difference, 95% CI, 9.0%-29%, <i>P</i> = .007). The 30-day readmission rates were higher in the stented group, although differences did not meet statistical significance (19% vs 9.8%, 9.1% difference, 95% CI, -4.8% to 23%, <i>P</i> = .3). Limitations include lack of randomization and inability to evaluate some outcomes, including ureteral obstruction or strictures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Omission of ureteral stent placement at RARC-IC is safe and feasible. Randomized trials are warranted to determine the effects of stents on risk of postoperative complications after RARC-IC.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"437-446"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888893/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142818529","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004348
Anita Robert, Ranjeeta Mallick, Daniel I McIsaac, Luke T Lavallée, Bimal Bhindi, Daniel Heng, Lori A Wood, Ricardo Rendon, Simon Tanguay, Anthony Finelli, Rahul K Bansal, Aly-Khan Lalani, Naveen Basappa, Miles P Mannas, Jasmir G Nayak, Georg A Bjarnason, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Frédéric Pouliot, Patrick O Richard, Camilla Tajzler, Rodney H Breau
Purpose: Postoperative prognostic tools allow for improved prediction of future recurrence risk, patient counseling, assessment of eligibility for adjuvant treatments, and appropriate follow-up surveillance. The purpose of this analysis was to validate prognostic models for patients with kidney cancer.
Materials and methods: The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system is a prospective cohort of patients managed at 14 institutions since January 1, 2011, to present. The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system was used to assess 15 predictive models for kidney cancer recurrence, 6 for cancer-specific mortality, and 4 for all-cause mortality in patients with a solitary, nonmetastatic kidney tumor treated with surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy). Discrimination was measured using C statistics, 5-year calibration plots for calibration, and decision curve analysis at 5 years after surgery for net benefit when considering adjuvant therapy.
Results: Seven thousand one hundred seventy-four patients were included. For kidney cancer recurrence, C statistics ranged from 0.62 to 0.83, depending on whether the model was derived and applied to all patients without further stratification, specific risk groups, or specific histologic subtypes. Cancer-specific mortality models had C statistics ranging from 0.60 to 0.89 and all-cause mortality models from 0.60 to 0.73. Using decision curve analysis in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, the best models for choosing adjuvant therapy to prevent recurrence and cancer-related death were the Mayo Clinic prediction models.
Conclusions: Model performance varied considerably with some suitable for clinical use. If using prediction models to select adjuvant therapy, the Mayo Clinic models were best when applied to a large contemporary cohort of Canadian patients.
{"title":"Validation of Prognostic Models for Renal Cell Carcinoma Recurrence, Cancer-Specific Mortality, and All-Cause Mortality.","authors":"Anita Robert, Ranjeeta Mallick, Daniel I McIsaac, Luke T Lavallée, Bimal Bhindi, Daniel Heng, Lori A Wood, Ricardo Rendon, Simon Tanguay, Anthony Finelli, Rahul K Bansal, Aly-Khan Lalani, Naveen Basappa, Miles P Mannas, Jasmir G Nayak, Georg A Bjarnason, Jean-Baptiste Lattouf, Frédéric Pouliot, Patrick O Richard, Camilla Tajzler, Rodney H Breau","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004348","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004348","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Postoperative prognostic tools allow for improved prediction of future recurrence risk, patient counseling, assessment of eligibility for adjuvant treatments, and appropriate follow-up surveillance. The purpose of this analysis was to validate prognostic models for patients with kidney cancer.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system is a prospective cohort of patients managed at 14 institutions since January 1, 2011, to present. The Canadian Kidney Cancer information system was used to assess 15 predictive models for kidney cancer recurrence, 6 for cancer-specific mortality, and 4 for all-cause mortality in patients with a solitary, nonmetastatic kidney tumor treated with surgery (partial or radical nephrectomy). Discrimination was measured using C statistics, 5-year calibration plots for calibration, and decision curve analysis at 5 years after surgery for net benefit when considering adjuvant therapy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Seven thousand one hundred seventy-four patients were included. For kidney cancer recurrence, C statistics ranged from 0.62 to 0.83, depending on whether the model was derived and applied to all patients without further stratification, specific risk groups, or specific histologic subtypes. Cancer-specific mortality models had C statistics ranging from 0.60 to 0.89 and all-cause mortality models from 0.60 to 0.73. Using decision curve analysis in patients with clear-cell renal cell carcinoma, the best models for choosing adjuvant therapy to prevent recurrence and cancer-related death were the Mayo Clinic prediction models.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Model performance varied considerably with some suitable for clinical use. If using prediction models to select adjuvant therapy, the Mayo Clinic models were best when applied to a large contemporary cohort of Canadian patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"455-466"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142770220","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-01-21DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004398
Eugenia Vercelli, Carl Van Haute, Thomas Tailly
{"title":"Editorial Comment.","authors":"Eugenia Vercelli, Carl Van Haute, Thomas Tailly","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004398","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004398","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"483"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143007337","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004458
{"title":"<i>The Journal of Urology</i><sup>®</sup> Home Study Course 2025 Volume 213/214.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004458","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004458","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":"213 4","pages":"542-543"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573129","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-02DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004355
Adree Khondker, Jin Kyu Kim, Ihtisham Ahmad, Jethro C C Kwong, Kay Rivera, Camilla B Moreno, Michael E Chua, Mandy Rickard, Armando J Lorenzo
Purpose: We describe and develop predictors for spontaneous resolution of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) from early ultrasound (US) measures.
Materials and methods: Children referred to our institution between 2007 and 2023 for POM were reviewed. POM was defined as hydroureteronephrosis with ureteral dilation > 7 mm. We excluded patients with other etiologies for upper tract dilation. Resolution was defined as decrease in hydronephrosis to < 10 mm anteroposterior diameter (APD) or Society for Fetal Urology grade ≤ 2 or ≤ 7 mm in hydroureter. Patients were censored if they underwent surgical intervention or were lost to follow-up before documenting resolution. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to illustrate the cumulative resolution rate and determine univariate associations. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify significant predictors for early resolution, and C index was calculated.
Results: A total of 159 patients were included, with a median index age of 2 months and a median follow-up of 30 months. Of these, 89 patients reached spontaneous resolution during monitoring, and likelihood of surgical indication at 1 year from US was 30%. APD > 15 mm, high-grade hydronephrosis, ureteral dilation > 10 mm, and ureter tortuosity at presentation were associated with a lower likelihood of resolution for individual Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox regression model trained on these predictors achieved an adjusted C index of 0.68, and low APD remained associated with a higher likelihood of resolution.
Conclusions: Early sonographic features in POM, specifically APD, are associated with the likelihood of spontaneous resolution. Patients with high-risk features at first US warrant closer follow-up.
{"title":"Spontaneous Resolution of Primary Obstructive Megaureter: Risk Stratification and Prediction Based on Early Sonographic Factors.","authors":"Adree Khondker, Jin Kyu Kim, Ihtisham Ahmad, Jethro C C Kwong, Kay Rivera, Camilla B Moreno, Michael E Chua, Mandy Rickard, Armando J Lorenzo","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004355","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004355","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We describe and develop predictors for spontaneous resolution of primary obstructive megaureter (POM) from early ultrasound (US) measures.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Children referred to our institution between 2007 and 2023 for POM were reviewed. POM was defined as hydroureteronephrosis with ureteral dilation > 7 mm. We excluded patients with other etiologies for upper tract dilation. Resolution was defined as decrease in hydronephrosis to < 10 mm anteroposterior diameter (APD) or Society for Fetal Urology grade ≤ 2 or ≤ 7 mm in hydroureter. Patients were censored if they underwent surgical intervention or were lost to follow-up before documenting resolution. Kaplan-Meier curves were drawn to illustrate the cumulative resolution rate and determine univariate associations. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify significant predictors for early resolution, and C index was calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 159 patients were included, with a median index age of 2 months and a median follow-up of 30 months. Of these, 89 patients reached spontaneous resolution during monitoring, and likelihood of surgical indication at 1 year from US was 30%. APD > 15 mm, high-grade hydronephrosis, ureteral dilation > 10 mm, and ureter tortuosity at presentation were associated with a lower likelihood of resolution for individual Kaplan-Meier curves. A Cox regression model trained on these predictors achieved an adjusted C index of 0.68, and low APD remained associated with a higher likelihood of resolution.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Early sonographic features in POM, specifically APD, are associated with the likelihood of spontaneous resolution. Patients with high-risk features at first US warrant closer follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"485-493"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142770218","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-10DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004353
Nicholas H Chakiryan
{"title":"Editorial Comment.","authors":"Nicholas H Chakiryan","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004353","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004353","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"465"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801398","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2024-12-09DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004370
Gregory E Tasian, Jonathan D Harper, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Hongqiu Yang, Naim M Maalouf, Michele Curatolo, H Henry Lai, Alana Desai, Jodi A Antonelli, Jing Huang, Justin B Ziemba, Hunter Wessells, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Peter P Reese
Purpose: We developed prediction models for severe pain and urinary symptoms after ureteroscopy with ureteral stent placement.
Materials and methods: The development cohort included 424 adults and adolescents enrolled in the multicenter STENTS prospective cohort study who underwent ureteroscopy with stent placement for urinary stones. The validation cohort was an independent prospective cohort of 115 adults. The outcomes were severe pain intensity and pain interference, measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, and severe urinary symptoms, measured by the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire. The top quartile of symptoms on postoperative days 1 and 3 was defined as severe. Generalized estimating equation models were used to predict severe symptoms on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to 9 in the development cohort and severe pain interference on days 1 and 7 in the validation cohort.
Results: Female sex, younger age, higher BMI, baseline pain interference, number of chronic pain conditions, renal stone location, and history of anxiety predicted severe pain. In the development cohort, the C statistics were 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.85) for severe pain interference and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.84) for severe pain intensity. A model in which baseline urinary symptoms replaced pain interference had excellent discrimination for severe urinary symptoms (C statistic 0.83; 95% CI 0.81-0.85). In the validation cohort, the C statistic was 0.7 for severe pain interference (95% CI 0.54-0.78).
Conclusions: Preoperative characteristics accurately predicted severe pain and urinary symptoms after ureteroscopy with stent placement. On further validation, these models could guide clinical decisions to improve surgical outcomes.
目的:我们建立输尿管镜下置入输尿管支架后严重疼痛和泌尿系统症状的预测模型。材料和方法:发展队列包括424名成人和青少年,他们参加了多中心支架前瞻性队列研究,接受输尿管镜检查并放置支架治疗尿路结石。验证队列是一个独立的前瞻性队列,包括115名成年人。结果为重度疼痛强度和疼痛干扰(由PROMIS测量)和重度泌尿系统症状(由输尿管支架症状问卷测量)。术后第1天和第3天症状的前四分位数被定义为严重。应用广义估计方程模型预测发展组术后第1、3、5和7-9天的严重症状,以及验证组第1和7天的严重疼痛干扰。结果:女性、年轻、较高的体重指数、基线疼痛干扰和慢性疼痛状况的数量、肾结石的位置和焦虑史预测严重疼痛。在发展队列中,严重疼痛干扰组的c统计值为0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.85),严重疼痛强度组的c统计值为0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.84)。基线尿路症状替代疼痛干扰的模型对严重尿路症状有很好的鉴别(c统计量0.83;95% ci 0.81-0.85)。在验证队列中,严重疼痛干扰的c统计量为0.7 (95% CI 0.54-0.78)。结论:术前特征准确预测输尿管镜置入支架后的剧烈疼痛和泌尿系统症状。经过进一步验证,这些模型可以指导临床决策以改善手术结果。
{"title":"Development of Prediction Models for Severe Pain and Urinary Symptoms After Ureteroscopy With Ureteral Stent Placement: Results From the STENTS Study and Initial Validation of Pain Interference.","authors":"Gregory E Tasian, Jonathan D Harper, Hussein R Al-Khalidi, Hongqiu Yang, Naim M Maalouf, Michele Curatolo, H Henry Lai, Alana Desai, Jodi A Antonelli, Jing Huang, Justin B Ziemba, Hunter Wessells, Ziya Kirkali, Charles D Scales, Peter P Reese","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004370","DOIUrl":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004370","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We developed prediction models for severe pain and urinary symptoms after ureteroscopy with ureteral stent placement.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The development cohort included 424 adults and adolescents enrolled in the multicenter STENTS prospective cohort study who underwent ureteroscopy with stent placement for urinary stones. The validation cohort was an independent prospective cohort of 115 adults. The outcomes were severe pain intensity and pain interference, measured by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System, and severe urinary symptoms, measured by the Ureteral Stent Symptom Questionnaire. The top quartile of symptoms on postoperative days 1 and 3 was defined as severe. Generalized estimating equation models were used to predict severe symptoms on postoperative days 1, 3, 5, and 7 to 9 in the development cohort and severe pain interference on days 1 and 7 in the validation cohort.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Female sex, younger age, higher BMI, baseline pain interference, number of chronic pain conditions, renal stone location, and history of anxiety predicted severe pain. In the development cohort, the C statistics were 0.83 (95% CI 0.80-0.85) for severe pain interference and 0.82 (95% CI 0.79-0.84) for severe pain intensity. A model in which baseline urinary symptoms replaced pain interference had excellent discrimination for severe urinary symptoms (C statistic 0.83; 95% CI 0.81-0.85). In the validation cohort, the C statistic was 0.7 for severe pain interference (95% CI 0.54-0.78).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Preoperative characteristics accurately predicted severe pain and urinary symptoms after ureteroscopy with stent placement. On further validation, these models could guide clinical decisions to improve surgical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":" ","pages":"475-484"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11888894/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142801371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004384
Steven E Canfield, Arvin K George, Joshua S Jue, Sara C Lewis, Matthew S Davenport, Varaha S Tammisetti, Mahir Maruf, Leonardo D Borregalaes, Yara Kadria-Vili, Jon A Schwartz, Jennifer West, Naomi J Halas, Ardeshir R Rastinehad
{"title":"A Multi-Institutional Study of Magnetic Resonance/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Nanoparticle-Directed Focal Therapy for Prostate Ablation: Erratum.","authors":"Steven E Canfield, Arvin K George, Joshua S Jue, Sara C Lewis, Matthew S Davenport, Varaha S Tammisetti, Mahir Maruf, Leonardo D Borregalaes, Yara Kadria-Vili, Jon A Schwartz, Jennifer West, Naomi J Halas, Ardeshir R Rastinehad","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004384","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004384","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":"213 4","pages":"541"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573134","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004388
Shelby P Smith, Michael E Moran
{"title":"HF01-01 The \"Exhibition of Living Patients\"-Hutchinson, Ethics and Urology: Erratum.","authors":"Shelby P Smith, Michael E Moran","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004388","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004388","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":"213 4","pages":"541"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573135","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2025-04-01Epub Date: 2025-03-07DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000004410
Bradley A Erickson, Mei N Tuong, Alithea N Zorn, Charles H Schlaepfer, Nejd F Alsikafi, Benjamin N Breyer, Joshua A Broghammer, Jill C Buckley, Sean P Elliott, Jeremy B Myers, Andrew C Peterson, Keith F Rourke, Thomas G Smith, Alex J Vanni, Bryan B Voelzke, Lee C Zhao
{"title":"Reply by Authors.","authors":"Bradley A Erickson, Mei N Tuong, Alithea N Zorn, Charles H Schlaepfer, Nejd F Alsikafi, Benjamin N Breyer, Joshua A Broghammer, Jill C Buckley, Sean P Elliott, Jeremy B Myers, Andrew C Peterson, Keith F Rourke, Thomas G Smith, Alex J Vanni, Bryan B Voelzke, Lee C Zhao","doi":"10.1097/JU.0000000000004410","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000004410","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":17471,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Urology","volume":"213 4","pages":"522-523"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143573201","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}