Effectiveness of ChatGPT in remote learning environments: An empirical study with medical students in Saudi Arabia.

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition and health Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1177/02601060241273596
Norah Alnaim, Duha Sami AlSanad, Salma Albelali, Munerah Almulhem, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Razaz Waheeb Attar, Mohammed Alsahli, Salem Albagmi, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Saja Almazrou, Saud Asman Almutairi, Hoda M AboAlsamh, Wejdan M Arif, Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan, Ibrahim Tawfeeq Alsedrah, Fahad Alanezi, Daneah Alibrahim, Nasser S Alqahtani
{"title":"Effectiveness of ChatGPT in remote learning environments: An empirical study with medical students in Saudi Arabia.","authors":"Norah Alnaim, Duha Sami AlSanad, Salma Albelali, Munerah Almulhem, Afnan Fahd Almuhanna, Razaz Waheeb Attar, Mohammed Alsahli, Salem Albagmi, Amal Mubarak Bakhshwain, Saja Almazrou, Saud Asman Almutairi, Hoda M AboAlsamh, Wejdan M Arif, Abeer Abdullah Alsadhan, Ibrahim Tawfeeq Alsedrah, Fahad Alanezi, Daneah Alibrahim, Nasser S Alqahtani","doi":"10.1177/02601060241273596","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in remote learning among medical students. <b>Methods:</b> This cross-sectional survey study recruited 386 medical students from three public universities in Saudi Arabia. Participants completed an online questionnaire designed to assess perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness in remote learning. The questionnaire included Likert scale questions to evaluate various aspects of ChatGPT's support in remote learning, such as personalized learning, language and communication skills, and interactive quizzing. Data were analyzed using SPSS, employing descriptive statistics, independent samples <i>t</i>-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Cronbach's alpha to evaluate reliability. <b>Results:</b> Participants mostly used ChatGPT on a weekly (43.2%) or daily (48.7%) basis, primarily on personal computers (62.5%). Mean scores for ChatGPT's support in remote learning were high for personalized learning (4.35), language and communication skills (4.23), and interactive quizzing and assessments (4.01). Statistically significant differences were found based on gender for interactive quizzing (<i>p</i> = .0177) and continuity of education (<i>p</i> = .0122). <b>Conclusion:</b> Despite certain challenges and variations in perceptions based on gender and education level, the overwhelmingly positive attitudes toward ChatGPT highlight its potential as a valuable tool in medical education.</p>","PeriodicalId":19352,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition and health","volume":" ","pages":"2601060241273596"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition and health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02601060241273596","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to assess the effectiveness of ChatGPT in remote learning among medical students. Methods: This cross-sectional survey study recruited 386 medical students from three public universities in Saudi Arabia. Participants completed an online questionnaire designed to assess perceptions of ChatGPT's effectiveness in remote learning. The questionnaire included Likert scale questions to evaluate various aspects of ChatGPT's support in remote learning, such as personalized learning, language and communication skills, and interactive quizzing. Data were analyzed using SPSS, employing descriptive statistics, independent samples t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and Cronbach's alpha to evaluate reliability. Results: Participants mostly used ChatGPT on a weekly (43.2%) or daily (48.7%) basis, primarily on personal computers (62.5%). Mean scores for ChatGPT's support in remote learning were high for personalized learning (4.35), language and communication skills (4.23), and interactive quizzing and assessments (4.01). Statistically significant differences were found based on gender for interactive quizzing (p = .0177) and continuity of education (p = .0122). Conclusion: Despite certain challenges and variations in perceptions based on gender and education level, the overwhelmingly positive attitudes toward ChatGPT highlight its potential as a valuable tool in medical education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ChatGPT 在远程学习环境中的有效性:对沙特阿拉伯医科学生的实证研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估 ChatGPT 在医学生远程学习中的有效性。研究方法这项横断面调查研究招募了来自沙特阿拉伯三所公立大学的 386 名医学生。参与者填写了一份在线问卷,旨在评估他们对 ChatGPT 在远程学习中的有效性的看法。调查问卷包括李克特量表问题,用于评估 ChatGPT 在远程学习中的各方面支持,如个性化学习、语言和交流技巧以及互动测验。使用 SPSS 对数据进行了分析,采用了描述性统计、独立样本 t 检验、单因素方差分析和 Cronbach's alpha 来评估信度。研究结果参与者大多每周(43.2%)或每天(48.7%)使用 ChatGPT,主要使用个人电脑(62.5%)。在个性化学习(4.35)、语言和交流技能(4.23)以及互动测验和评估(4.01)方面,ChatGPT 对远程学习支持的平均得分较高。在互动测验(p = .0177)和教育连续性(p = .0122)方面,性别差异具有统计学意义。结论尽管存在一些挑战,而且不同性别和教育水平的人对 ChatGPT 的看法也不尽相同,但绝大多数人对 ChatGPT 持积极态度,这凸显了 ChatGPT 作为医学教育重要工具的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition and health
Nutrition and health Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
160
期刊最新文献
Personalized nutrition after discharge for pancreatic surgery: A study protocol. Creatine and sleep habits and disorders in the general population aged 16 years and over: NHANES 2007-2008. Creatine with guanidinoacetic acid improves prefrontal brain oxygenation before, during, and after a cognitive task: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Exploring the association of dietary inflammatory index, disease progression and cellular integrity in chronic kidney disease: A cross-sectional study. Factors associated with high nutrition risk by 10-year age group: Data from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1