Association of Gaps in Medical Insurance Coverage with Vision Care Benefits Among US Adults.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 OPHTHALMOLOGY Ophthalmic epidemiology Pub Date : 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1080/09286586.2024.2378757
Mufida Muhammad, Johnny Vang, Dmitry Tumin
{"title":"Association of Gaps in Medical Insurance Coverage with Vision Care Benefits Among US Adults.","authors":"Mufida Muhammad, Johnny Vang, Dmitry Tumin","doi":"10.1080/09286586.2024.2378757","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In the US, routine vision care and medical services are often covered by separate insurance plans. Unmet needs for vision care are more common among adults with gaps in medical coverage, but it is unclear how gaps in medical coverage correlate with lack of vision benefits among currently insured adults. We hypothesized that gaps in medical coverage in the past 12 months would be associated with lack of coverage for vision care among US adults currently covered by commercial medical insurance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We included adults age 18-65 with private insurance who participated in the 2019-2022 National Health Interview Survey. The primary outcome was any coverage for vision care services, and the secondary outcome was a source of vision coverage (primary health insurance policy as compared to single-service plans only).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Based on a sample of 50,000 participants, we estimated 4% of commercially insured adults recently experienced coverage gaps, and 75% had coverage for vision care services. On multivariable analysis, commercially insured adults with recent gaps in medical coverage were more likely to lack coverage for vision care at the time of the survey, compared to adults with continuous medical coverage (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.86). However, medical coverage gaps were not associated with source of vision care coverage.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Gaps in medical insurance coverage were associated with lower likelihood of vision care coverage compared to continuous medical coverage. Protecting continuity of health insurance may support access to vision benefits and reduce gaps in routine vision care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19607,"journal":{"name":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ophthalmic epidemiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09286586.2024.2378757","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In the US, routine vision care and medical services are often covered by separate insurance plans. Unmet needs for vision care are more common among adults with gaps in medical coverage, but it is unclear how gaps in medical coverage correlate with lack of vision benefits among currently insured adults. We hypothesized that gaps in medical coverage in the past 12 months would be associated with lack of coverage for vision care among US adults currently covered by commercial medical insurance.

Methods: We included adults age 18-65 with private insurance who participated in the 2019-2022 National Health Interview Survey. The primary outcome was any coverage for vision care services, and the secondary outcome was a source of vision coverage (primary health insurance policy as compared to single-service plans only).

Results: Based on a sample of 50,000 participants, we estimated 4% of commercially insured adults recently experienced coverage gaps, and 75% had coverage for vision care services. On multivariable analysis, commercially insured adults with recent gaps in medical coverage were more likely to lack coverage for vision care at the time of the survey, compared to adults with continuous medical coverage (odds ratio [OR], 0.77; 95% CI: 0.68, 0.86). However, medical coverage gaps were not associated with source of vision care coverage.

Conclusions: Gaps in medical insurance coverage were associated with lower likelihood of vision care coverage compared to continuous medical coverage. Protecting continuity of health insurance may support access to vision benefits and reduce gaps in routine vision care.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美国成年人医疗保险与视力保健福利之间的差距。
背景:在美国,常规视力保健和医疗服务通常由不同的保险计划承保。在医疗保险存在缺口的成年人中,视力保健需求未得到满足的情况更为普遍,但目前还不清楚医疗保险缺口与当前投保成年人缺乏视力福利之间的关联。我们假设,过去 12 个月的医疗保险缺口与目前有商业医疗保险的美国成年人缺乏视力保健福利有关:我们纳入了参加 2019-2022 年全国健康访谈调查的 18-65 岁有私人保险的成年人。主要结果是视力保健服务的任何承保范围,次要结果是视力保险的来源(主要医疗保险政策与仅单一服务计划相比):结果:根据 50,000 名参与者的样本,我们估计有 4% 的商业保险成年人最近出现了保险缺口,75% 的人拥有视力保健服务保险。通过多变量分析发现,与拥有连续医疗保险的成年人相比,最近有医疗保险缺口的商业保险成年人在接受调查时更有可能没有视力保健服务(几率比 [OR],0.77;95% CI:0.68,0.86)。然而,医疗保险缺口与视力保健保险来源无关:结论:与连续的医疗保险相比,医疗保险缺口与视力保健投保可能性较低有关。保护医疗保险的连续性可以帮助人们获得视力福利,减少常规视力保健的缺口。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ophthalmic epidemiology
Ophthalmic epidemiology 医学-眼科学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.60%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ophthalmic Epidemiology is dedicated to the publication of original research into eye and vision health in the fields of epidemiology, public health and the prevention of blindness. Ophthalmic Epidemiology publishes editorials, original research reports, systematic reviews and meta-analysis articles, brief communications and letters to the editor on all subjects related to ophthalmic epidemiology. A broad range of topics is suitable, such as: evaluating the risk of ocular diseases, general and specific study designs, screening program implementation and evaluation, eye health care access, delivery and outcomes, therapeutic efficacy or effectiveness, disease prognosis and quality of life, cost-benefit analysis, biostatistical theory and risk factor analysis. We are looking to expand our engagement with reports of international interest, including those regarding problems affecting developing countries, although reports from all over the world potentially are suitable. Clinical case reports, small case series (not enough for a cohort analysis) articles and animal research reports are not appropriate for this journal.
期刊最新文献
Cataract Phacoemulsification in People with Dementia: Characterization and Outcomes. Ophthalmologists' Perspective on Barriers to Cataract Surgery and Surgical Productivity in Ethiopia, Ghana, and Zambia: A Descriptive, Mixed-Methods Survey. COVID-19 Testing and Vaccination Among US Older Adults with Vision Impairment: The National Health and Aging Trends Study 2021. Bilateral Involvement of Age-Related Macular Degeneration in South Korea: Findings from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2017-2020. Epidemiology of Keratoconjunctivitis Across India from 2017 to 2019: A Multicentric Hospital-Based Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1