Single-stage reconstruction of severe question mark ear with the absence of large portions of the lobule using affected cartilage graft and 3 flaps

{"title":"Single-stage reconstruction of severe question mark ear with the absence of large portions of the lobule using affected cartilage graft and 3 flaps","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.bjps.2024.07.074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Question mark ear (QME) is a congenital abnormality characterized by a prominent curve within the helix that resembles a question mark. Several surgical reconstruction techniques have been proposed to treat this deformity. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of a new cartilage and postauricular flap surgical reconstruction technique for patients diagnosed with severe QME.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>From 2017 to 2023, 33 patients with severe QMEs were treated with a new reconstruction surgical technique at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of Peking Union Medical College. The perimeter, width, length, and auriculocephalic angles of both ears were measured and compared to assess the symmetry. The patient’s satisfaction with the surgical outcomes and incidence of post-operative complications were also evaluated. The average follow-up duration was 15.48 months.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The auricular perimeter, width, and length changed significantly after surgery. The dimensions of the left and right ear did not vary significantly in patients with unilateral or bilateral severe QME after surgery and at the end of the 1-year follow-up. Most patients (87.88%) or carers were satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes after surgery. All patients underwent suture removal 14 days after surgery and exhibited excellent wound healing without any complications such as hematoma, infection, and flap necrosis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our new surgical reconstruction technique for severe QME resulted in good cosmetic outcomes, high patient satisfaction, fast recovery, and no post-operative complications.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50084,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1748681524004546","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Question mark ear (QME) is a congenital abnormality characterized by a prominent curve within the helix that resembles a question mark. Several surgical reconstruction techniques have been proposed to treat this deformity. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the cosmetic outcomes of a new cartilage and postauricular flap surgical reconstruction technique for patients diagnosed with severe QME.

Method

From 2017 to 2023, 33 patients with severe QMEs were treated with a new reconstruction surgical technique at the Plastic Surgery Hospital of Peking Union Medical College. The perimeter, width, length, and auriculocephalic angles of both ears were measured and compared to assess the symmetry. The patient’s satisfaction with the surgical outcomes and incidence of post-operative complications were also evaluated. The average follow-up duration was 15.48 months.

Results

The auricular perimeter, width, and length changed significantly after surgery. The dimensions of the left and right ear did not vary significantly in patients with unilateral or bilateral severe QME after surgery and at the end of the 1-year follow-up. Most patients (87.88%) or carers were satisfied with the cosmetic outcomes after surgery. All patients underwent suture removal 14 days after surgery and exhibited excellent wound healing without any complications such as hematoma, infection, and flap necrosis.

Conclusion

Our new surgical reconstruction technique for severe QME resulted in good cosmetic outcomes, high patient satisfaction, fast recovery, and no post-operative complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用患侧软骨移植和 3 个皮瓣,分阶段重建缺失大部分耳小叶的重度问号耳
背景问号耳(QME)是一种先天性畸形,其特征是螺旋内有一个突出的曲线,像一个问号。目前已提出多种手术重建技术来治疗这种畸形。本研究旨在评估一种新的软骨和耳后皮瓣手术重建技术对确诊为重度QME患者的美容效果。方法从2017年至2023年,北京协和医院整形外科采用一种新的重建手术技术治疗了33例重度QME患者。测量并比较双耳的周长、宽度、长度和耳廓角,以评估对称性。此外,还评估了患者对手术效果的满意度和术后并发症的发生率。平均随访时间为 15.48 个月。单侧或双侧重度 QME 患者的左右耳尺寸在术后和 1 年随访结束时没有明显变化。大多数患者(87.88%)或护理人员对术后的美容效果表示满意。所有患者均在术后14天拆线,伤口愈合良好,未出现血肿、感染和皮瓣坏死等并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
578
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: JPRAS An International Journal of Surgical Reconstruction is one of the world''s leading international journals, covering all the reconstructive and aesthetic aspects of plastic surgery. The journal presents the latest surgical procedures with audit and outcome studies of new and established techniques in plastic surgery including: cleft lip and palate and other heads and neck surgery, hand surgery, lower limb trauma, burns, skin cancer, breast surgery and aesthetic surgery.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board The impact of cosmetic tourism across one year on an NHS breast surgery unit The roles of extracranial intravascular lesion, vasodilation-induced neural entrapment, and arteriolysis in migraine treatment Nail reconstruction using an osteo-onychocutaneous flap with the dorsal digital artery of the hallux as the pedicle: Techniques and anatomical insights Reduction mammaplasty relieves depression in women with macromastia: A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1