Dirk R.M. Lukkien , Henk Herman Nap , Minke ter Stal , Wouter P.C. Boon , Alexander Peine , Mirella M.N. Minkman , Ellen H.M. Moors
{"title":"Embedding responsible innovation into R&D practices: A case study of socially assistive robot development","authors":"Dirk R.M. Lukkien , Henk Herman Nap , Minke ter Stal , Wouter P.C. Boon , Alexander Peine , Mirella M.N. Minkman , Ellen H.M. Moors","doi":"10.1016/j.jrt.2024.100091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Responsible Innovation (RI) approach aims to transform research and development (R&D) into being more anticipatory, inclusive, reflective, and responsive. This study highlights the challenges of embedding RI in R&D practices. We fostered collective learning on RI in a socially assistive robot development project through applying participatory action research (PAR). In the PAR, we employed a mixed-methods approach, combining interviews, workshops, and online questionnaires, to collectively explore opportunities for RI, and elicit team member perceptions, opinions, and beliefs about RI. Our PAR led to some modest yet purposeful, deliberate efforts to address particular concerns regarding, for instance, privacy, control, and energy consumption. However, we also found that the embedding of RI in R&D practices can be hampered by four partly interrelated barriers: lack of an action perspective, the noncommittal nature of RI, the misconception that co-design equals RI, and limited integration between different R&D task groups. In this paper, we discuss the implications of these barriers for R&D teams and funding bodies, and we recommend PAR as a solution to address these barriers.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of responsible technology","volume":"19 ","pages":"Article 100091"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659624000179/pdfft?md5=4f57f50c76da7b7d23cec3401fba2a9f&pid=1-s2.0-S2666659624000179-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of responsible technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666659624000179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The Responsible Innovation (RI) approach aims to transform research and development (R&D) into being more anticipatory, inclusive, reflective, and responsive. This study highlights the challenges of embedding RI in R&D practices. We fostered collective learning on RI in a socially assistive robot development project through applying participatory action research (PAR). In the PAR, we employed a mixed-methods approach, combining interviews, workshops, and online questionnaires, to collectively explore opportunities for RI, and elicit team member perceptions, opinions, and beliefs about RI. Our PAR led to some modest yet purposeful, deliberate efforts to address particular concerns regarding, for instance, privacy, control, and energy consumption. However, we also found that the embedding of RI in R&D practices can be hampered by four partly interrelated barriers: lack of an action perspective, the noncommittal nature of RI, the misconception that co-design equals RI, and limited integration between different R&D task groups. In this paper, we discuss the implications of these barriers for R&D teams and funding bodies, and we recommend PAR as a solution to address these barriers.
负责任的创新(RI)方法旨在将研究与开发(R&D)转变为更具预见性、包容性、反思性和响应性的方法。本研究强调了在研发实践中嵌入责任创新所面临的挑战。我们通过应用参与式行动研究(PAR),在一个社会辅助机器人开发项目中促进了有关 RI 的集体学习。在参与式行动研究中,我们采用了一种混合方法,将访谈、研讨会和在线问卷调查结合起来,共同探索 RI 的机会,并征求团队成员对 RI 的看法、意见和信念。我们的 PAR 导致了一些适度但有目的的、深思熟虑的努力,以解决诸如隐私、控制和能源消耗等方面的特定问题。不过,我们也发现,在研发实践中嵌入 RI 可能会受到四个部分相互关联的障碍的阻碍:缺乏行动视角、RI 的非承诺性、认为共同设计等于 RI 的误解,以及不同研发任务小组之间有限的整合。在本文中,我们将讨论这些障碍对研发团队和资助机构的影响,并推荐 PAR 作为解决这些障碍的方案。