Optimization strategies for carbon neutrality in a maize-soybean rotation production system from farm to gate

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Sustainable Production and Consumption Pub Date : 2024-08-10 DOI:10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.006
{"title":"Optimization strategies for carbon neutrality in a maize-soybean rotation production system from farm to gate","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.08.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Agricultural food production stands as a primary source of global greenhouse gas emissions, with residue management widely acknowledged as an effective avenue to achieve carbon neutrality. However, there is a lack of comprehensive assessment of the carbon footprint of agricultural residue production, processing, and recycling from farm to gate. Here we conducted a hybrid approach that integrated the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) model and life cycle carbon footprint to co-optimize water and residue management, targeting carbon neutrality and yield increase. The results revealed that controlled drainage with sub-irrigation (CDSI) served as a potent water management strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions (15.65 %) while increasing yield (24.34 %) compared to free drainage. Regardless of the type of bioproduct, incorporating CDSI with downstream residue utilization exhibited substantial potential for carbon-negative emissions, reducing the average farm carbon footprint to −1538.15 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq yr<sup>−1</sup>. Among those scenarios, the CDSI with bioethanol scenario particularly stands out with its robust carbon mitigation capability (−1994.94 kg CO<sub>2</sub> eq yr<sup>−1</sup>), driven by the enormous energy demand throughout the agricultural production process and the environmental friendliness of bioethanol, which substantially exceeds that of gasoline. However, challenges such as high plant construction costs and extended investment payback periods associated with residue conversion underscore the need for the urgent establishment of national subsidies and market mechanisms to foster carbon neutrality in agricultural production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S235255092400232X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Agricultural food production stands as a primary source of global greenhouse gas emissions, with residue management widely acknowledged as an effective avenue to achieve carbon neutrality. However, there is a lack of comprehensive assessment of the carbon footprint of agricultural residue production, processing, and recycling from farm to gate. Here we conducted a hybrid approach that integrated the DeNitrification-DeComposition (DNDC) model and life cycle carbon footprint to co-optimize water and residue management, targeting carbon neutrality and yield increase. The results revealed that controlled drainage with sub-irrigation (CDSI) served as a potent water management strategy to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions (15.65 %) while increasing yield (24.34 %) compared to free drainage. Regardless of the type of bioproduct, incorporating CDSI with downstream residue utilization exhibited substantial potential for carbon-negative emissions, reducing the average farm carbon footprint to −1538.15 kg CO2 eq yr−1. Among those scenarios, the CDSI with bioethanol scenario particularly stands out with its robust carbon mitigation capability (−1994.94 kg CO2 eq yr−1), driven by the enormous energy demand throughout the agricultural production process and the environmental friendliness of bioethanol, which substantially exceeds that of gasoline. However, challenges such as high plant construction costs and extended investment payback periods associated with residue conversion underscore the need for the urgent establishment of national subsidies and market mechanisms to foster carbon neutrality in agricultural production.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
玉米-大豆轮作生产系统从农场到大门的碳中和优化战略
农业粮食生产是全球温室气体排放的主要来源,而残留物管理被广泛认为是实现碳中和的有效途径。然而,目前还缺乏对农业残留物生产、加工和循环利用从农场到大门的碳足迹的全面评估。在此,我们采用了一种混合方法,将脱硝-脱碳(DNDC)模型和生命周期碳足迹相结合,共同优化水和秸秆管理,以实现碳中和与增产目标。研究结果表明,与自由排水相比,控制排水加灌溉(CDSI)是一种有效的水管理策略,可减少温室气体排放(15.65%),同时提高产量(24.34%)。无论生物产品的类型如何,将 CDSI 与下游残留物利用结合在一起都显示出碳负排放的巨大潜力,可将农场平均碳足迹减少到 -1538.15 kg CO2 eq yr-1。在这些设想方案中,由于整个农业生产过程对能源的巨大需求,以及生物乙醇的环境友好性大大超过汽油,因此 CDSI 与生物乙醇方案的碳减排能力尤为突出(-1994.94 kg CO2 eq yr-1)。然而,与残留物转化相关的工厂建设成本高、投资回收期长等挑战突出表明,迫切需要建立国家补贴和市场机制,以促进农业生产中的碳中和。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
期刊最新文献
Residential water choices: Assessing the willingness to adopt alternative water sources by examining risk perceptions and personal norms in Belgium Global nutrient content embedded in food losses and waste: Identifying the sources and magnitude along the food supply chain Global projections of plastic use, end-of-life fate and potential changes in consumption, reduction, recycling and replacement with bioplastics to 2050 What should be understood to promote environmentally sustainable diets? Transitioning towards circular households: Exploring influential factors and constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1