Technological advancements and sustainable practices in rock slope stability – Critical review

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Physics and Chemistry of the Earth Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.pce.2024.103699
P. Rajendra Kumar , Kasinathan Muthukkumaran , Chetan Sharma
{"title":"Technological advancements and sustainable practices in rock slope stability – Critical review","authors":"P. Rajendra Kumar ,&nbsp;Kasinathan Muthukkumaran ,&nbsp;Chetan Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.pce.2024.103699","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Rock slope stability assessment is a vital component of geotechnical engineering, with significant implications for sustainability and environmental management. This review evaluates methodologies and tools used in large-scale rock modeling, analyzing their effectiveness and limitations. By examining recent advancements and commonly used software, the study aims to identify research gaps and enhance current practices. It emphasizes the connection between rock slope stability and sustainable development goals (SDGs), water resource management and climate action. The review critically assesses how existing methodologies integrate sustainability considerations, revealing both strengths and shortcomings in current approaches. It identifies a substantial research gap: the need for more holistic assessment frameworks that balance engineering requirements with ecological and societal impacts. The study also highlights opportunities for innovation in rock slope modeling techniques, particularly in incorporating climate change projections and ecosystem dynamics. By synthesizing findings from diverse case studies, the review offers valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to improve the sustainable slope management. The critical evaluation serves as a foundation for future research directions, stressing the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in addressing complex geotechnical challenges. Ultimately, this review aims to catalyze the development of more sustainable and resilient rock slope assessment methodologies, contributing to the broader goal of harmonizing engineering interventions with environmental stewardship and societal well-being.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54616,"journal":{"name":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","volume":"136 ","pages":"Article 103699"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physics and Chemistry of the Earth","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474706524001578","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rock slope stability assessment is a vital component of geotechnical engineering, with significant implications for sustainability and environmental management. This review evaluates methodologies and tools used in large-scale rock modeling, analyzing their effectiveness and limitations. By examining recent advancements and commonly used software, the study aims to identify research gaps and enhance current practices. It emphasizes the connection between rock slope stability and sustainable development goals (SDGs), water resource management and climate action. The review critically assesses how existing methodologies integrate sustainability considerations, revealing both strengths and shortcomings in current approaches. It identifies a substantial research gap: the need for more holistic assessment frameworks that balance engineering requirements with ecological and societal impacts. The study also highlights opportunities for innovation in rock slope modeling techniques, particularly in incorporating climate change projections and ecosystem dynamics. By synthesizing findings from diverse case studies, the review offers valuable insights for researchers, practitioners, and policymakers aiming to improve the sustainable slope management. The critical evaluation serves as a foundation for future research directions, stressing the importance of interdisciplinary approaches in addressing complex geotechnical challenges. Ultimately, this review aims to catalyze the development of more sustainable and resilient rock slope assessment methodologies, contributing to the broader goal of harmonizing engineering interventions with environmental stewardship and societal well-being.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
岩石斜坡稳定性方面的技术进步和可持续做法--重要评论
岩石斜坡稳定性评估是岩土工程的重要组成部分,对可持续发展和环境管理具有重大影响。本综述评估了用于大规模岩石建模的方法和工具,分析了其有效性和局限性。通过考察最新进展和常用软件,本研究旨在找出研究差距并改进当前实践。它强调了岩石边坡稳定性与可持续发展目标(SDGs)、水资源管理和气候行动之间的联系。审查批判性地评估了现有方法如何整合可持续性因素,揭示了当前方法的优势和不足。它指出了一个巨大的研究缺口:需要更全面的评估框架,以平衡工程要求与生态和社会影响。研究还强调了岩石边坡建模技术的创新机会,特别是在纳入气候变化预测和生态系统动态方面。通过综合不同案例研究的结果,本综述为旨在改善可持续边坡管理的研究人员、从业人员和政策制定者提供了宝贵的见解。批判性评估为未来的研究方向奠定了基础,强调了跨学科方法在应对复杂岩土工程挑战中的重要性。最终,本综述旨在促进开发更具可持续性和复原力的岩石边坡评估方法,为实现工程干预与环境管理和社会福祉相协调这一更广泛的目标做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
176
审稿时长
31.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Physics and Chemistry of the Earth is an international interdisciplinary journal for the rapid publication of collections of refereed communications in separate thematic issues, either stemming from scientific meetings, or, especially compiled for the occasion. There is no restriction on the length of articles published in the journal. Physics and Chemistry of the Earth incorporates the separate Parts A, B and C which existed until the end of 2001. Please note: the Editors are unable to consider submissions that are not invited or linked to a thematic issue. Please do not submit unsolicited papers. The journal covers the following subject areas: -Solid Earth and Geodesy: (geology, geochemistry, tectonophysics, seismology, volcanology, palaeomagnetism and rock magnetism, electromagnetism and potential fields, marine and environmental geosciences as well as geodesy). -Hydrology, Oceans and Atmosphere: (hydrology and water resources research, engineering and management, oceanography and oceanic chemistry, shelf, sea, lake and river sciences, meteorology and atmospheric sciences incl. chemistry as well as climatology and glaciology). -Solar-Terrestrial and Planetary Science: (solar, heliospheric and solar-planetary sciences, geology, geophysics and atmospheric sciences of planets, satellites and small bodies as well as cosmochemistry and exobiology).
期刊最新文献
Dynamic coupling coordination of territorial spatial development intensity and comprehensive disaster-carrying capability: A case study of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei urban agglomerations, China Development and evaluation of site-specific evapotranspiration models in Malawi through a comparative analysis of existing models Adsorption of hexavalent chromium from wastewater using magnetic biochar derived from peanut hulls Assessing the impact of coal furnace activities on air quality: A comprehensive spatial and temporal analysis Improvability of quality main indices of a marl soil using endemic microorganisms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1