Transforming medical students' speaking-up behaviors in medical errors: The impact of simulation and personalized debriefing.

IF 3.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Medical Teacher Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2390039
Hung-Wei Tsai, S Barry Issenberg, Yi-Chun Chen, Enoch Yi-No Kang, Hui-Wen Chen, Jen-Chieh Wu
{"title":"Transforming medical students' speaking-up behaviors in medical errors: The impact of simulation and personalized debriefing.","authors":"Hung-Wei Tsai, S Barry Issenberg, Yi-Chun Chen, Enoch Yi-No Kang, Hui-Wen Chen, Jen-Chieh Wu","doi":"10.1080/0142159X.2024.2390039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sharing mental models is essential for high-performance teams, and speaking up is key for exchanging critical insights, especially during medical errors. Understanding how health providers and trainees voice their concerns is crucial for improving speaking-up behavior. This study aims to fill a gap in the literature by examining how medical students speak up when they encounter medical errors and assessing the impact of training on their speaking-up patterns.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A quasi-experimental study involving 146 students, who were divided into two groups, was conducted in Northern Taiwan. One group of students encountered life-threatening scenario before intervention, followed by a faculty-led personalized debriefing session, then a non-life-threatening scenario after the intervention. Another group of students underwent these sessions in the reverse order. Students' Speaking-up patterns, including expression style, form and attitude, and their speaking-up confidence were assessed at pre- and post-intervention scenarios.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During pre-intervention scenario, in expression style, 50 students (34.5%) addressed their concerns to medical errors with direct expression and 14 students (9.7%) utilized indirect hint to express their concerns. In expression form, 31 students (21.4%) addressed their concerns to medical errors with affirmative sentences and 33 students (22.8%) asked questions to express their concerns. In speaking-up attitude, 47 students (32.4%) used unoffensive words, while 17 students (11.7%) used offensive words. After intervention, significantly change of speaking-up styles, forms, and attitude were observed along with their speaking-up confidence (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Medical students are inclined to speak up in the event of medical errors using more direct expression and affirmative sentences, along with increased speaking-up confidence after simulation scenario learning and faculty-led personalized debriefing. Healthcare educators can focus more on discussing with students the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches of speaking-up in medical errors, helping them to develop effective speaking-up behaviors in a variety of medical contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":18643,"journal":{"name":"Medical Teacher","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Teacher","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2390039","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sharing mental models is essential for high-performance teams, and speaking up is key for exchanging critical insights, especially during medical errors. Understanding how health providers and trainees voice their concerns is crucial for improving speaking-up behavior. This study aims to fill a gap in the literature by examining how medical students speak up when they encounter medical errors and assessing the impact of training on their speaking-up patterns.

Method: A quasi-experimental study involving 146 students, who were divided into two groups, was conducted in Northern Taiwan. One group of students encountered life-threatening scenario before intervention, followed by a faculty-led personalized debriefing session, then a non-life-threatening scenario after the intervention. Another group of students underwent these sessions in the reverse order. Students' Speaking-up patterns, including expression style, form and attitude, and their speaking-up confidence were assessed at pre- and post-intervention scenarios.

Results: During pre-intervention scenario, in expression style, 50 students (34.5%) addressed their concerns to medical errors with direct expression and 14 students (9.7%) utilized indirect hint to express their concerns. In expression form, 31 students (21.4%) addressed their concerns to medical errors with affirmative sentences and 33 students (22.8%) asked questions to express their concerns. In speaking-up attitude, 47 students (32.4%) used unoffensive words, while 17 students (11.7%) used offensive words. After intervention, significantly change of speaking-up styles, forms, and attitude were observed along with their speaking-up confidence (p < 0.001).

Discussion: Medical students are inclined to speak up in the event of medical errors using more direct expression and affirmative sentences, along with increased speaking-up confidence after simulation scenario learning and faculty-led personalized debriefing. Healthcare educators can focus more on discussing with students the advantages and disadvantages of various approaches of speaking-up in medical errors, helping them to develop effective speaking-up behaviors in a variety of medical contexts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
转变医学生在医疗事故中的直言不讳行为:模拟和个性化汇报的影响。
简介分享心智模式对高绩效团队至关重要,而畅所欲言则是交流重要见解的关键,尤其是在发生医疗事故时。了解医疗服务提供者和受训者如何表达他们的担忧,对于改善直言不讳的行为至关重要。本研究旨在通过考察医科学生在遇到医疗事故时如何直言不讳,以及评估培训对其直言不讳模式的影响,填补文献空白:方法:在台湾北部进行了一项准实验研究,将 146 名学生分为两组。一组学生在干预前遇到危及生命的情景,随后在教师指导下进行个性化汇报,然后在干预后遇到非危及生命的情景。另一组学生则以相反的顺序经历了这些环节。在干预前和干预后的情景中,对学生的说话模式(包括表达方式、形式和态度)以及说话信心进行了评估:在干预前的情景中,在表达方式上,50 名学生(34.5%)用直接表达的方式表达了他们对医疗事故的担忧,14 名学生(9.7%)用间接暗示的方式表达了他们的担忧。在表达形式上,31 名学生(21.4%)用肯定句表达了他们对医疗事故的担忧,33 名学生(22.8%)用提问的方式表达了他们的担忧。在说话态度方面,47 名学生(32.4%)使用了无攻击性的词语,17 名学生(11.7%)使用了攻击性词语。干预后,学生的发言方式、形式和态度以及发言信心都发生了明显变化(p 讨论):经过模拟情景学习和教师引导的个性化汇报后,医学生倾向于在发生医疗差错时使用更直接的表达方式和肯定性的句子,并增强了说话的自信心。医护教育者可以更注重与学生讨论在医疗事故中说出真相的各种方法的优缺点,帮助他们在各种医疗情境中养成有效的说出真相的行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Teacher
Medical Teacher 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.50%
发文量
396
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Medical Teacher provides accounts of new teaching methods, guidance on structuring courses and assessing achievement, and serves as a forum for communication between medical teachers and those involved in general education. In particular, the journal recognizes the problems teachers have in keeping up-to-date with the developments in educational methods that lead to more effective teaching and learning at a time when the content of the curriculum—from medical procedures to policy changes in health care provision—is also changing. The journal features reports of innovation and research in medical education, case studies, survey articles, practical guidelines, reviews of current literature and book reviews. All articles are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
Mental health and wellness of medical students in Ontario - A mixed methods approach. To automate or facilitate, that is the question. Humanising case-based learning. Self-regulated learning microanalysis feedback for developing clinical skills: A pilot study. Striking fear into students' hearts: Unforeseen consequences of prescribing education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1