Bank cost efficiency and credit market structure under a volatile exchange rate

IF 3.6 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Banking & Finance Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107285
Mikhail Mamonov , Christopher F. Parmeter , Artem B. Prokhorov
{"title":"Bank cost efficiency and credit market structure under a volatile exchange rate","authors":"Mikhail Mamonov ,&nbsp;Christopher F. Parmeter ,&nbsp;Artem B. Prokhorov","doi":"10.1016/j.jbankfin.2024.107285","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We study the impact of exchange rate volatility on cost efficiency and market structure in a cross-section of banks that have non-trivial exposures to foreign currency (FX) operations. We use unique data on quarterly revaluations of FX assets and liabilities (Revals) that Russian banks were reporting between 2004 Q1 and 2020 Q2. <em>First</em>, we document that Revals constitute the largest part of the banks’ total costs, 26.5% on average, with considerable variation across banks. <em>Second</em>, we find that stochastic estimates of cost efficiency are both severely downward biased – by 30% on average – and generally not rank preserving when Revals are ignored, except for the tails, as our nonparametric copulas reveal. To ensure generalizability to other emerging market economies, we suggest a two-stage approach that does not rely on Revals but is able to shrink the downward bias in cost efficiency estimates by two-thirds. <em>Third</em>, we show that Revals are triggered by the mismatch in the banks’ FX operations, which, in turn, is driven by household FX deposits and the instability of Ruble’s exchange rate. <em>Fourth</em>, we find that the failure to account for Revals leads to the erroneous conclusion that the credit market is inefficient, which is driven by the upper quartile of the banks’ distribution by total assets. Revals have considerable negative implications for financial stability which can be attenuated by the cross-border diversification of bank assets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48460,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Banking & Finance","volume":"168 ","pages":"Article 107285"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Banking & Finance","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378426624001997","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We study the impact of exchange rate volatility on cost efficiency and market structure in a cross-section of banks that have non-trivial exposures to foreign currency (FX) operations. We use unique data on quarterly revaluations of FX assets and liabilities (Revals) that Russian banks were reporting between 2004 Q1 and 2020 Q2. First, we document that Revals constitute the largest part of the banks’ total costs, 26.5% on average, with considerable variation across banks. Second, we find that stochastic estimates of cost efficiency are both severely downward biased – by 30% on average – and generally not rank preserving when Revals are ignored, except for the tails, as our nonparametric copulas reveal. To ensure generalizability to other emerging market economies, we suggest a two-stage approach that does not rely on Revals but is able to shrink the downward bias in cost efficiency estimates by two-thirds. Third, we show that Revals are triggered by the mismatch in the banks’ FX operations, which, in turn, is driven by household FX deposits and the instability of Ruble’s exchange rate. Fourth, we find that the failure to account for Revals leads to the erroneous conclusion that the credit market is inefficient, which is driven by the upper quartile of the banks’ distribution by total assets. Revals have considerable negative implications for financial stability which can be attenuated by the cross-border diversification of bank assets.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
汇率波动下的银行成本效率和信贷市场结构
我们研究了汇率波动对银行成本效率和市场结构的影响。我们使用了俄罗斯银行在 2004 年第一季度至 2020 年第二季度期间报告的外汇资产和负债季度重估(Revals)的独特数据。首先,我们记录了重估价值占银行总成本的最大部分,平均为 26.5%,但各银行之间存在很大差异。其次,我们发现,正如我们的非参数共线方程所揭示的,当忽略 Revals 时,成本效率的随机估计值既存在严重的向下偏差(平均偏差 30%),而且除了尾部外,一般不存在等级保护。为确保对其他新兴市场经济体的普适性,我们提出了一种不依赖 Revals 的两阶段方法,但能将成本效率估计值的向下偏差缩小三分之二。第三,我们表明,Revals 是由银行外汇业务的不匹配引发的,而银行外汇业务的不匹配又是由家庭外汇存款和卢布汇率的不稳定性驱动的。第四,我们发现,如果不考虑Revals,就会得出信贷市场效率低下的错误结论,而这是由银行总资产分布的上四分位数驱动的。Revals 对金融稳定性有相当大的负面影响,而银行资产的跨境分散化可以减轻这种影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.40%
发文量
262
期刊介绍: The Journal of Banking and Finance (JBF) publishes theoretical and empirical research papers spanning all the major research fields in finance and banking. The aim of the Journal of Banking and Finance is to provide an outlet for the increasing flow of scholarly research concerning financial institutions and the money and capital markets within which they function. The Journal''s emphasis is on theoretical developments and their implementation, empirical, applied, and policy-oriented research in banking and other domestic and international financial institutions and markets. The Journal''s purpose is to improve communications between, and within, the academic and other research communities and policymakers and operational decision makers at financial institutions - private and public, national and international, and their regulators. The Journal is one of the largest Finance journals, with approximately 1500 new submissions per year, mainly in the following areas: Asset Management; Asset Pricing; Banking (Efficiency, Regulation, Risk Management, Solvency); Behavioural Finance; Capital Structure; Corporate Finance; Corporate Governance; Derivative Pricing and Hedging; Distribution Forecasting with Financial Applications; Entrepreneurial Finance; Empirical Finance; Financial Economics; Financial Markets (Alternative, Bonds, Currency, Commodity, Derivatives, Equity, Energy, Real Estate); FinTech; Fund Management; General Equilibrium Models; High-Frequency Trading; Intermediation; International Finance; Hedge Funds; Investments; Liquidity; Market Efficiency; Market Microstructure; Mergers and Acquisitions; Networks; Performance Analysis; Political Risk; Portfolio Optimization; Regulation of Financial Markets and Institutions; Risk Management and Analysis; Systemic Risk; Term Structure Models; Venture Capital.
期刊最新文献
Three decades of failed bank acquisitions Factor momentum versus price momentum: Insights from international markets Editorial Board Does maker-taker limit order subsidy improve market outcomes? Quasi-natural experimental evidence Does regulatory and supervisory independence affect financial stability?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1