Developing nudges, nudge+ and boosts to support climate change mitigation in practice – A case study on ash fertilization among Finnish private forest owners

IF 2.7 Q1 FORESTRY Trees, Forests and People Pub Date : 2024-08-08 DOI:10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100643
Marjo Maidell , Mats Godenhielm , Annukka Vainio , Paula Salo
{"title":"Developing nudges, nudge+ and boosts to support climate change mitigation in practice – A case study on ash fertilization among Finnish private forest owners","authors":"Marjo Maidell ,&nbsp;Mats Godenhielm ,&nbsp;Annukka Vainio ,&nbsp;Paula Salo","doi":"10.1016/j.tfp.2024.100643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forests are crucial for climate change mitigation as they absorb and store large amounts of carbon dioxide. In Finland, ash fertilization of drained peatland forests has been identified as part of the climate change mitigation strategy, yet it is implemented notably less than it could be. Therefore, this study aimed to identify most effective nudges, nudge+ and boosts that could steer Finnish non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners to adopt ash fertilization in their forest. Semi-structured interviews with 19 NIPF owners were analyzed using the Behaviour change wheel to identify key factors influencing owners’ willingness to engage in ash fertilization. Most factors raised by forest owners were related to reflective motivation encompassing both drivers and barriers to practicing ash fertilization. We also identified possible cognitive biases that were influencing decisions. The suggested nudges, nudge+ and boosts address both the specific concerns of the forest owners and the underlying heuristics. For example, framing ash fertilization as a standard procedure of professional forest management and including it into forest management plans could facilitate overcoming status quo bias that may hinder the adoption of novel forest management practices. These findings are directly applicable for creating nudges, nudge+ and boosts on ash fertilization for experienced, professionally managing NIPF owners with larger forest estates. Our study also offers an approach that can be adapted for broader application in environmental and climate-friendly decision-making, contributing to the growing body of literature on the intersection of behavioral science and environmental management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36104,"journal":{"name":"Trees, Forests and People","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266671932400150X/pdfft?md5=39b224f52372417403b50e9f6e50fe35&pid=1-s2.0-S266671932400150X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trees, Forests and People","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S266671932400150X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forests are crucial for climate change mitigation as they absorb and store large amounts of carbon dioxide. In Finland, ash fertilization of drained peatland forests has been identified as part of the climate change mitigation strategy, yet it is implemented notably less than it could be. Therefore, this study aimed to identify most effective nudges, nudge+ and boosts that could steer Finnish non-industrial private forest (NIPF) owners to adopt ash fertilization in their forest. Semi-structured interviews with 19 NIPF owners were analyzed using the Behaviour change wheel to identify key factors influencing owners’ willingness to engage in ash fertilization. Most factors raised by forest owners were related to reflective motivation encompassing both drivers and barriers to practicing ash fertilization. We also identified possible cognitive biases that were influencing decisions. The suggested nudges, nudge+ and boosts address both the specific concerns of the forest owners and the underlying heuristics. For example, framing ash fertilization as a standard procedure of professional forest management and including it into forest management plans could facilitate overcoming status quo bias that may hinder the adoption of novel forest management practices. These findings are directly applicable for creating nudges, nudge+ and boosts on ash fertilization for experienced, professionally managing NIPF owners with larger forest estates. Our study also offers an approach that can be adapted for broader application in environmental and climate-friendly decision-making, contributing to the growing body of literature on the intersection of behavioral science and environmental management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在实践中发展 "引导"、"引导+"和 "推动",以支持减缓气候变化--芬兰私人森林所有者灰分施肥案例研究
森林吸收并储存了大量二氧化碳,对减缓气候变化至关重要。在芬兰,对干涸的泥炭地森林进行灰分施肥已被确定为气候变化减缓战略的一部分,但其实施程度却远远低于预期。因此,本研究旨在找出最有效的 "引导"、"引导+"和 "推动 "措施,以引导芬兰非工业化私有森林(NIPF)所有者在其森林中采用白蜡施肥。对 19 位非工业化私有林所有者进行的半结构式访谈使用行为变化轮进行了分析,以确定影响所有者进行白蜡施肥意愿的关键因素。森林所有者提出的大多数因素都与反思动机有关,其中包括实施白蜡施肥的动力和障碍。我们还发现了可能影响决策的认知偏差。我们建议的 "鼓励"、"鼓励+"和 "促进 "既能解决森林所有者的具体问题,又能解决潜在的启发式思维。例如,将白蜡施肥作为专业森林管理的标准程序,并将其纳入森林管理计划,有助于克服可能阻碍采用新型森林管理方法的现状偏见。这些研究结果直接适用于为拥有较大森林庄园、经验丰富、专业管理国家森林投资基金的所有者提供白蜡施肥方面的鼓励、鼓励+和促进措施。我们的研究还提供了一种方法,可以更广泛地应用于环境和气候友好型决策,为行为科学与环境管理交叉领域日益增多的文献做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Trees, Forests and People
Trees, Forests and People Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
172
审稿时长
56 days
期刊最新文献
Tapping below the lateral line does not reduce maple sap yield or quality Examining woody plant diversity across indigenous agroforestry practices in the Kellem Wollega zone, Western Ethiopia The livelihood impacts of eucalypt plantations on rural farm households in Western Gurage Watersheds, Central-south Ethiopia Palynological approaches to forest restoration in Southeast Asia: Challenges and opportunities for Thailand—A systematic review Timber traceability, determining effective methods to combat illegal logging in Africa: A review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1