A slow and deceitful path to decarbonization? Critically assessing corporate climate disclosure as central tool of soft climate governance

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Energy Research & Social Science Pub Date : 2024-08-16 DOI:10.1016/j.erss.2024.103704
{"title":"A slow and deceitful path to decarbonization? Critically assessing corporate climate disclosure as central tool of soft climate governance","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2024.103704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Companies increasingly disclose climate information via voluntary frameworks and emerging mandatory reporting regimes. However, corporations remain large contributors to the increase of global CO2 emissions. Researchers have identified major flaws in corporate climate reporting, yet a more fundamental critique is necessary to understand climate reporting's potential and limitations for decarbonizing the economy. The dominant approach in current polycentric, multi-level, and transnational climate governance is soft climate governance. This article presents a critical discussion of disclosure as a tool of soft climate governance and argues that a climate disclosure regime has spread across the global economy. Though subtle and hard to grasp, this regime is powerful in normalizing corporate climate disclosure across countries and industries. It constitutes a distinct social construction and offers companies two resources: a business-compatible theory of change and a structured climate governance approach. Through an in-depth qualitative analysis of ten companies from Germany, Brazil, and the United States, this article conceptualizes climate disclosure as a formalized practice of valuation. While successful in translating climate change into business language, the climate disclosure regime currently does not enable a rapid transformation of the economy. The article offers an innovative explanation for the limited effects of climate disclosure on reducing corporate greenhouse gas emissions, but avoids a destructive critique that dismisses climate disclosure as mere greenwashing activity. Simultaneously, it counters naïve illusions that more transparency, better standards, and the right performance indicators will solve the “wicked problem” of climate change.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002950/pdfft?md5=3f5ccb9f268a5da2ea6ce8998aff8ff4&pid=1-s2.0-S2214629624002950-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629624002950","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Companies increasingly disclose climate information via voluntary frameworks and emerging mandatory reporting regimes. However, corporations remain large contributors to the increase of global CO2 emissions. Researchers have identified major flaws in corporate climate reporting, yet a more fundamental critique is necessary to understand climate reporting's potential and limitations for decarbonizing the economy. The dominant approach in current polycentric, multi-level, and transnational climate governance is soft climate governance. This article presents a critical discussion of disclosure as a tool of soft climate governance and argues that a climate disclosure regime has spread across the global economy. Though subtle and hard to grasp, this regime is powerful in normalizing corporate climate disclosure across countries and industries. It constitutes a distinct social construction and offers companies two resources: a business-compatible theory of change and a structured climate governance approach. Through an in-depth qualitative analysis of ten companies from Germany, Brazil, and the United States, this article conceptualizes climate disclosure as a formalized practice of valuation. While successful in translating climate change into business language, the climate disclosure regime currently does not enable a rapid transformation of the economy. The article offers an innovative explanation for the limited effects of climate disclosure on reducing corporate greenhouse gas emissions, but avoids a destructive critique that dismisses climate disclosure as mere greenwashing activity. Simultaneously, it counters naïve illusions that more transparency, better standards, and the right performance indicators will solve the “wicked problem” of climate change.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
去碳化之路缓慢而充满欺骗?批判性评估作为软气候治理核心工具的企业气候信息披露
越来越多的公司通过自愿框架和新出现的强制报告制度披露气候信息。然而,企业仍然是全球二氧化碳排放量增加的主要推手。研究人员已经发现了企业气候报告中的重大缺陷,但要了解气候报告在经济去碳化方面的潜力和局限性,还需要进行更根本的批判。当前多中心、多层次和跨国气候治理的主流方法是软气候治理。本文对作为软气候治理工具的信息披露进行了批判性讨论,并认为气候信息披露制度已遍布全球经济。尽管这一制度微妙而难以把握,但它在使各国和各行业的企业气候信息披露正常化方面却十分强大。它构成了一种独特的社会建构,并为企业提供了两种资源:与企业相容的变革理论和结构化的气候治理方法。通过对来自德国、巴西和美国的十家公司进行深入的定性分析,本文将气候信息披露概念化为一种正式的评估实践。气候信息披露制度虽然成功地将气候变化转化为商业语言,但目前还无法实现经济的快速转型。文章对气候信息披露在减少企业温室气体排放方面的有限效果做出了创新性解释,但避免了将气候信息披露视为单纯的 "洗绿 "活动的破坏性批判。同时,文章也反驳了那种认为更高的透明度、更好的标准和正确的绩效指标就能解决气候变化这一 "棘手问题 "的天真幻想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
期刊最新文献
Juggling the basics: How much does an income increase affect energy spending of low-income households in England? The informality-energy innovation-finance nexus: Sustainable business models for microgrid-based off-grid urban energy access The future of fossil fuels, chemicals, and feedstocks: Outlining a research agenda on the role of China in the global petrochemical industry Green hydrogen transitions deepen socioecological risks and extractivist patterns: evidence from 28 prospective exporting countries in the Global South Unpacking travel needs and experiences: Insights from qualitative interviews with affordable housing residents in California
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1