Pilot-scale evaluation of a dynamic body-feed filtration system for primary clarification of snake antivenoms produced by the caprylic acid method

IF 3.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY Toxicon: X Pub Date : 2024-08-13 DOI:10.1016/j.toxcx.2024.100202
{"title":"Pilot-scale evaluation of a dynamic body-feed filtration system for primary clarification of snake antivenoms produced by the caprylic acid method","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.toxcx.2024.100202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The performance of dynamic body-feed filtration (DBF) in the removal of bulky solids produced during the manufacturing of snake antivenoms using the caprylic acid method was evaluated. For this purpose, diatomites with different filterability properties were compared in a bench-scale study to assess their effectiveness in removing the precipitated material formed after the addition of caprylic acid to equine hyperimmune plasma. C1000 diatomite at a concentration of 90 g/L of precipitated plasma showed the best performance. Then, the process was scaled up to three batches of 50 L of hyperimmune horse plasma. At this pilot scale, 108 ± 4% of the immunoglobulins present following plasma precipitation were recovered after DBF. The antivenoms generated using this procedure met quality specifications. When compared to open filtration systems commonly used at an industrial scale by many antivenom manufacturers, DBF has a similar yield and produces filtrates with comparable physicochemical characteristics. However, DBF ensures the microbiological quality of the primary clarification in a way that open systems cannot. This is because: 1) DBF is performed in a single-use closed device of depth filters which prevents microbial contamination, and 2) DBF removes bulky material in few minutes instead of the more than 24 h needed by open filtration systems, thus reducing the risk of contamination. It was concluded that DBF is a cost-effective, easily validated, and GMP-compliant alternative for primary clarification following caprylic acid precipitation of plasma in snake antivenom production.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":37124,"journal":{"name":"Toxicon: X","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171024000195/pdfft?md5=3dd29b384f64d71414bc636ba033eb5f&pid=1-s2.0-S2590171024000195-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxicon: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590171024000195","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The performance of dynamic body-feed filtration (DBF) in the removal of bulky solids produced during the manufacturing of snake antivenoms using the caprylic acid method was evaluated. For this purpose, diatomites with different filterability properties were compared in a bench-scale study to assess their effectiveness in removing the precipitated material formed after the addition of caprylic acid to equine hyperimmune plasma. C1000 diatomite at a concentration of 90 g/L of precipitated plasma showed the best performance. Then, the process was scaled up to three batches of 50 L of hyperimmune horse plasma. At this pilot scale, 108 ± 4% of the immunoglobulins present following plasma precipitation were recovered after DBF. The antivenoms generated using this procedure met quality specifications. When compared to open filtration systems commonly used at an industrial scale by many antivenom manufacturers, DBF has a similar yield and produces filtrates with comparable physicochemical characteristics. However, DBF ensures the microbiological quality of the primary clarification in a way that open systems cannot. This is because: 1) DBF is performed in a single-use closed device of depth filters which prevents microbial contamination, and 2) DBF removes bulky material in few minutes instead of the more than 24 h needed by open filtration systems, thus reducing the risk of contamination. It was concluded that DBF is a cost-effective, easily validated, and GMP-compliant alternative for primary clarification following caprylic acid precipitation of plasma in snake antivenom production.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对用于初级澄清用辛酸法生产的蛇毒血清的动态主体进料过滤系统进行试验性评估
我们评估了动态给体过滤(DBF)在去除使用辛酸法生产蛇毒血清过程中产生的大块固体物质方面的性能。为此,在一项台式研究中对具有不同过滤特性的硅藻土进行了比较,以评估它们在去除向马高免疫血浆中添加辛酸后形成的沉淀物方面的效果。沉淀血浆浓度为 90 克/升的 C1000 硅藻土表现最佳。然后,将该工艺放大到三批 50 升高免疫马血浆。在这一试验规模中,血浆沉淀后的免疫球蛋白有 108 ± 4% 在 DBF 后被回收。使用该程序生成的抗蛇毒血清符合质量规格。与许多抗蛇毒血清生产商在工业规模上常用的开放式过滤系统相比,DBF 的产量相似,生产的滤液理化特性也相当。不过,DBF 能确保初级澄清的微生物质量,而开放式系统则无法做到这一点。这是因为1) DBF 是在深度过滤器的一次性封闭装置中进行的,可防止微生物污染,以及 2) DBF 可在几分钟内去除大块物质,而开放式过滤系统则需要 24 小时以上,因此降低了污染风险。结论是,DBF 是一种成本效益高、易于验证且符合 GMP 标准的替代方法,可用于蛇毒抗蛇毒血清生产中血浆的辛酸沉淀后的初级澄清。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Toxicon: X
Toxicon: X Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Toxicology
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Stress levels, hematological condition, and productivity of plasma-producing horses used for snake antivenom manufacture: A comparison of two industrial bleeding methods Diagnosis of human envenoming by terrestrial venomous animals: Routine, advances, and perspectives Supplementation of polyclonal antibodies, developed against epitope-string toxin-specific peptide immunogens, to commercial polyvalent antivenom, shows improved neutralization of Indian Big Four and Naja kaouthia snake venoms Bioprospection of rattlesnake venom peptide fractions with anti-adipose and anti-insulin resistance activity in vitro A probabilistic hazard assessment for cyanobacterial toxins accounting for regional geography and water body trophic status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1