Close replication of Paul, Lee, and Ashton (2022): Who tells prosocial lies?

IF 2.6 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Research in Personality Pub Date : 2024-08-03 DOI:10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104525
Nina Reinhardt, Magdalena Mikesch, Lennart Hoppe, Marc-André Reinhard
{"title":"Close replication of Paul, Lee, and Ashton (2022): Who tells prosocial lies?","authors":"Nina Reinhardt,&nbsp;Magdalena Mikesch,&nbsp;Lennart Hoppe,&nbsp;Marc-André Reinhard","doi":"10.1016/j.jrp.2024.104525","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Within the present research, we conducted a close replication of <span><span>Paul et al. (2022)</span></span>, who reported the HEXACO Honesty-Humility trait to be positively correlated with prosocial lies by applying a procedure in which participants should rate a poorly written essay. Consistent with the original study, participants (<em>N</em> = 324) higher in Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness showed more prosocial lying. Because the associations disappeared within a shared regression model, we assume the correlation between Honesty-Humility and prosocial lies to be weaker than postulated within the original study and to be at least as equivalently strong as the association between Agreeableness and prosocial lies. The validity and generalizability of the findings and the limitations of the original and the replication study are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48406,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Personality","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 104525"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000734/pdfft?md5=56f437d2edfe8409b32826625331cb2c&pid=1-s2.0-S0092656624000734-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0092656624000734","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the present research, we conducted a close replication of Paul et al. (2022), who reported the HEXACO Honesty-Humility trait to be positively correlated with prosocial lies by applying a procedure in which participants should rate a poorly written essay. Consistent with the original study, participants (N = 324) higher in Honesty-Humility and Agreeableness showed more prosocial lying. Because the associations disappeared within a shared regression model, we assume the correlation between Honesty-Humility and prosocial lies to be weaker than postulated within the original study and to be at least as equivalently strong as the association between Agreeableness and prosocial lies. The validity and generalizability of the findings and the limitations of the original and the replication study are discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
近似复制保罗、李和阿什顿(2022 年)的研究成果:谁会说亲社会谎言?
在本研究中,我们对保罗等人(Paul et al., 2022)的研究进行了近似的复制。保罗等人报告说,HEXACO诚实-谦逊特质与亲社会谎言呈正相关,他们采用了一个程序,让参与者对一篇写得不好的文章进行评分。与最初的研究结果一致,诚实-谦逊性和宜人性较高的参与者(N = 324)表现出更多的亲社会谎言。由于这些关联在一个共同的回归模型中消失了,因此我们假定诚实-谦逊与亲社会谎言之间的相关性比原研究中假定的要弱,并且至少与 "同意度 "与亲社会谎言之间的相关性一样强。本文讨论了研究结果的有效性和可推广性,以及原始研究和复制研究的局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
102
审稿时长
67 days
期刊介绍: Emphasizing experimental and descriptive research, the Journal of Research in Personality presents articles that examine important issues in the field of personality and in related fields basic to the understanding of personality. The subject matter includes treatments of genetic, physiological, motivational, learning, perceptual, cognitive, and social processes of both normal and abnormal kinds in human and animal subjects. Features: • Papers that present integrated sets of studies that address significant theoretical issues relating to personality. • Theoretical papers and critical reviews of current experimental and methodological interest. • Single, well-designed studies of an innovative nature. • Brief reports, including replication or null result studies of previously reported findings, or a well-designed studies addressing questions of limited scope.
期刊最新文献
The dynamic relationship between state extraversion and the subjectively perceived situational sociality in continuous time “High empathic response but low interest”: Machiavellianism and its neurostructural basis relate to perceived risk of social exclusion and workplace deviance Incremental relations between self-understanding and social functioning beyond personality traits in young adults Cross-cultural evidence for an association between agreeableness and sweet taste preferences Does insecurity lead to envy? The longitudinal interplay between dispositional envy and self-esteem
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1