Spatial and temporal variation in the prevalence of illegal lead shot in reared and wild mallards harvested in England.

IF 7.6 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Pollution Pub Date : 2024-12-15 Epub Date: 2024-08-15 DOI:10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124756
Emily A Strong, Sarah L Crowley, Julia L Newth, Michelle F O'Brien, Rosa Lopez Colom, Sean A Davis, Ruth L Cromie, Stuart Bearhop, Robbie A McDonald
{"title":"Spatial and temporal variation in the prevalence of illegal lead shot in reared and wild mallards harvested in England.","authors":"Emily A Strong, Sarah L Crowley, Julia L Newth, Michelle F O'Brien, Rosa Lopez Colom, Sean A Davis, Ruth L Cromie, Stuart Bearhop, Robbie A McDonald","doi":"10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124756","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use of lead shotgun ammunition for shooting wildfowl has been restricted in England since 1999, but surveys finding lead shot in harvested birds show compliance with regulations has been low. Following the announcement in 2020 of a voluntary transition from lead to non-lead shot by UK shooting organizations, we investigated spatiotemporal variation in the composition of ammunition used for shooting mallards Anas platyrhynchos. We collected 176 harvested mallards during the 2021/22 shooting season and analyzed recent shot extracted from carcasses to determine shot composition. Using a separate collection of ducks of known provenance, we used stable isotope analysis as a means of differentiating captive-reared from wild mallards. This allowed us to understand how compliance might vary between driven game shooters, characterized by shooting birds that are flushed over a stationary line of shooters, and who primarily harvest captive-reared and released ducks, and wild duck shooters. Of 133 mallards containing recent shot, 92 (69%) had been illegally shot with lead. Analysis of this and five comparable surveys between 2001 and 2019 indicates regional and temporal variation in lead shot presence in England. In the North West and West Midlands, the likelihood of mallards containing lead shot decreased significantly over time, but no other regions showed significant changes. The use of non-lead shot types varied over time, with increases in steel shot use approximately matched by declines in bismuth shot. Mallards likely to be reared were more likely to have been shot with lead (75%) than those likely to be wild (48%). This suggests the use of lead shot is more frequent among driven game shooters than wild duck shooters. In England in 2021/22, most mallards continued to be shot with lead, suggesting that neither legislation nor voluntary approaches have been effective in substantially reducing illegal use of lead shot.</p>","PeriodicalId":311,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Pollution","volume":" ","pages":"124756"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Pollution","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2024.124756","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use of lead shotgun ammunition for shooting wildfowl has been restricted in England since 1999, but surveys finding lead shot in harvested birds show compliance with regulations has been low. Following the announcement in 2020 of a voluntary transition from lead to non-lead shot by UK shooting organizations, we investigated spatiotemporal variation in the composition of ammunition used for shooting mallards Anas platyrhynchos. We collected 176 harvested mallards during the 2021/22 shooting season and analyzed recent shot extracted from carcasses to determine shot composition. Using a separate collection of ducks of known provenance, we used stable isotope analysis as a means of differentiating captive-reared from wild mallards. This allowed us to understand how compliance might vary between driven game shooters, characterized by shooting birds that are flushed over a stationary line of shooters, and who primarily harvest captive-reared and released ducks, and wild duck shooters. Of 133 mallards containing recent shot, 92 (69%) had been illegally shot with lead. Analysis of this and five comparable surveys between 2001 and 2019 indicates regional and temporal variation in lead shot presence in England. In the North West and West Midlands, the likelihood of mallards containing lead shot decreased significantly over time, but no other regions showed significant changes. The use of non-lead shot types varied over time, with increases in steel shot use approximately matched by declines in bismuth shot. Mallards likely to be reared were more likely to have been shot with lead (75%) than those likely to be wild (48%). This suggests the use of lead shot is more frequent among driven game shooters than wild duck shooters. In England in 2021/22, most mallards continued to be shot with lead, suggesting that neither legislation nor voluntary approaches have been effective in substantially reducing illegal use of lead shot.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英格兰饲养和野生野鸭体内非法铅弹流行率的空间和时间变化。
自 1999 年以来,英国一直限制使用含铅猎枪弹药射杀野禽,但调查发现,在收获的鸟类中发现铅丸的情况表明,遵守法规的程度很低。在英国射击组织于 2020 年宣布自愿从含铅枪弹过渡到无铅枪弹之后,我们对射击野鸭所用弹药成分的时空变化进行了调查。我们收集了 2021/22 年射击季期间捕获的 176 只野鸭,并分析了从野鸭尸体上提取的最近射出的子弹,以确定子弹成分。通过单独收集已知来源的野鸭,我们使用稳定同位素分析作为区分人工饲养野鸭和野生野鸭的方法。这使我们能够了解驱赶式野味射击者与野鸭射击者在遵守规定方面的差异,驱赶式野味射击者的特点是射击冲过射击者静止线的鸟类,他们主要收获人工饲养和释放的野鸭,而野鸭射击者的特点是射击冲过射击者静止线的鸟类,他们主要收获人工饲养和释放的野鸭。在 133 只最近被射杀的野鸭中,有 92 只(69%)是被非法铅射杀的。对这次调查和 2001 年至 2019 年期间的五次可比调查进行的分析表明,在英格兰,铅弹的存在存在地区性和时间性差异。在西北部和西米德兰兹郡,野鸭含铅弹丸的可能性随着时间的推移显著下降,但其他地区没有出现显著变化。非铅弹类型的使用随时间推移而变化,钢弹使用量的增加与铋弹使用量的减少大致相当。与野生野鸭(48%)相比,饲养野鸭更有可能被铅射中(75%)。这表明,与野鸭射手相比,野鸭射手更经常使用铅弹。在英格兰,2021/22年度的大多数野鸭仍然是用铅射杀的,这表明无论是立法还是自愿性方法都未能有效地大幅减少铅弹的非法使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Pollution
Environmental Pollution 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
6.70%
发文量
2082
审稿时长
2.9 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Pollution is an international peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality research papers and review articles covering all aspects of environmental pollution and its impacts on ecosystems and human health. Subject areas include, but are not limited to: • Sources and occurrences of pollutants that are clearly defined and measured in environmental compartments, food and food-related items, and human bodies; • Interlinks between contaminant exposure and biological, ecological, and human health effects, including those of climate change; • Contaminants of emerging concerns (including but not limited to antibiotic resistant microorganisms or genes, microplastics/nanoplastics, electronic wastes, light, and noise) and/or their biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Laboratory and field studies on the remediation/mitigation of environmental pollution via new techniques and with clear links to biological, ecological, or human health effects; • Modeling of pollution processes, patterns, or trends that is of clear environmental and/or human health interest; • New techniques that measure and examine environmental occurrences, transport, behavior, and effects of pollutants within the environment or the laboratory, provided that they can be clearly used to address problems within regional or global environmental compartments.
期刊最新文献
Spatial and temporal variation in the prevalence of illegal lead shot in reared and wild mallards harvested in England. Migration and natural attenuation of leachate pollutants in bedrock fissure aquifer at a valley landfill site. Trace organic contaminants in U.S. national park surface waters: Prevalence and ecological context. Source identification and human exposure assessment of organophosphate flame retardants and plasticisers in soil and outdoor dust from Nigerian e-waste dismantling and dumpsites. Comparative toxicity of oral exposure to paraquat: Survival rates and gene expression in two honey bees species; Apis mellifera and Apis cerana.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1