Longitudinal Changes in Maximal Forced Inspiratory Flow and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COPD.

IF 9.5 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Chest Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-14 DOI:10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.162
Dong Hyun Kim, Eun-Tae Jeon, Hyo Jin Lee, Heemoon Park, Jung-Kyu Lee, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Hyun Woo Lee
{"title":"Longitudinal Changes in Maximal Forced Inspiratory Flow and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With COPD.","authors":"Dong Hyun Kim, Eun-Tae Jeon, Hyo Jin Lee, Heemoon Park, Jung-Kyu Lee, Eun Young Heo, Deog Kyeom Kim, Hyun Woo Lee","doi":"10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>COPD primarily impairs expiratory flow due to progressive airflow obstruction and reduced lung elasticity. Increasing evidence underlines the importance of inspiratory flow as a biomarker for selecting inhaler devices and providing ancillary aerodynamic information.</p><p><strong>Research question: </strong>Do the longitudinal changes in maximum forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax) influence acute exacerbations and lung function decline in patients with COPD?</p><p><strong>Study design and methods: </strong>This longitudinal study evaluated FIFmax in patients with COPD over a 7-year period from 2004 to 2020. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on FIFmax trajectory: the increased FIFmax group and the decreased FIFmax group. The study assessed the annual rate of acute exacerbations and the annual decline rate of FEV<sub>1</sub>. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment status, with a focus on inhaled therapy and inhaler device usage.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the eligible 956 patients with COPD, 56.5% belonged to the increased FIFmax group. After propensity score matching, the increased FIFmax group experienced lower rates of severe exacerbations (0.16 per year vs 0.25 per year, P = .017) and a slower decline in FEV<sub>1</sub> (0 [interquartile range, -51 to 71] mL/y vs -43 [interquartile range, -119 to 6] mL/y; P < .001) compared with the decreased FIFmax group. These associations were particularly prominent in patients using specific inhaler therapies such as dry powder inhalers.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>This study showed that the longitudinal changes in FIFmax are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. Patients with increased FIFmax experienced a lower rate of severe exacerbations and a slower decline in lung function. These findings suggest the potential benefits of optimizing inspiratory flow in COPD management, although further studies are needed to confirm these observations due to potential confounding factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":9782,"journal":{"name":"Chest","volume":" ","pages":"76-86"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chest","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2024.07.162","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: COPD primarily impairs expiratory flow due to progressive airflow obstruction and reduced lung elasticity. Increasing evidence underlines the importance of inspiratory flow as a biomarker for selecting inhaler devices and providing ancillary aerodynamic information.

Research question: Do the longitudinal changes in maximum forced inspiratory flow (FIFmax) influence acute exacerbations and lung function decline in patients with COPD?

Study design and methods: This longitudinal study evaluated FIFmax in patients with COPD over a 7-year period from 2004 to 2020. Eligible patients were categorized into two groups based on FIFmax trajectory: the increased FIFmax group and the decreased FIFmax group. The study assessed the annual rate of acute exacerbations and the annual decline rate of FEV1. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on treatment status, with a focus on inhaled therapy and inhaler device usage.

Results: Among the eligible 956 patients with COPD, 56.5% belonged to the increased FIFmax group. After propensity score matching, the increased FIFmax group experienced lower rates of severe exacerbations (0.16 per year vs 0.25 per year, P = .017) and a slower decline in FEV1 (0 [interquartile range, -51 to 71] mL/y vs -43 [interquartile range, -119 to 6] mL/y; P < .001) compared with the decreased FIFmax group. These associations were particularly prominent in patients using specific inhaler therapies such as dry powder inhalers.

Interpretation: This study showed that the longitudinal changes in FIFmax are associated with clinical outcomes in patients with COPD. Patients with increased FIFmax experienced a lower rate of severe exacerbations and a slower decline in lung function. These findings suggest the potential benefits of optimizing inspiratory flow in COPD management, although further studies are needed to confirm these observations due to potential confounding factors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
慢性阻塞性肺病患者最大用力吸气流量的纵向变化与临床疗效。
背景:慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)主要是由于进行性气流阻塞和肺弹性降低而影响呼气流量。越来越多的证据表明,吸气流量是选择吸入器设备和提供辅助空气动力学信息的重要生物标志物:研究问题:最大强制吸气流量(FIFmax)的纵向变化是否会影响慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的急性加重和肺功能下降?这项纵向研究观察了慢性阻塞性肺病患者的最大用力吸气流量(FIFmax),时间跨度为 2004 年至 2020 年,为期 7 年。根据 FIFmax 的轨迹将符合条件的患者分为两组:FIFmax 增加组和 FIFmax 减少组。我们的研究评估了急性加重的年发生率和1秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的年下降率。根据治疗情况进行了分组分析,重点是吸入疗法和吸入器械的使用情况:在符合条件的 956 名慢性阻塞性肺病患者中,56.5% 属于 FIFmax 增加组。经过倾向得分匹配后,FIFmax 增加组的严重病情加重率较低(0.16/年 vs. 0.25/年,P 值=0.017),FEV1 下降速度较慢(0 [四分位距(IQR),-51-71] vs. -43 [四分位距(IQR),-119-6] ml/年,P 值解释:我们的研究表明,FIFmax 的纵向变化与 COPD 患者的临床预后有关。FIFmax增加的患者严重恶化的发生率较低,肺功能下降的速度较慢。这些发现表明,在慢性阻塞性肺病的治疗中优化吸气流量具有潜在的益处,但由于潜在的混杂因素,还需要进一步的研究来证实这些观察结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Chest
Chest 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
13.70
自引率
3.10%
发文量
3369
审稿时长
15 days
期刊介绍: At CHEST, our mission is to revolutionize patient care through the collaboration of multidisciplinary clinicians in the fields of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. We achieve this by publishing cutting-edge clinical research that addresses current challenges and brings forth future advancements. To enhance understanding in a rapidly evolving field, CHEST also features review articles, commentaries, and facilitates discussions on emerging controversies. We place great emphasis on scientific rigor, employing a rigorous peer review process, and ensuring all accepted content is published online within two weeks.
期刊最新文献
Dupilumab Improves Health-Related Quality of Life and Respiratory Symptoms in Patients With COPD and Type 2 Inflammation: BOREAS and NOTUS. Hermansky-Pudlak Syndrome in the United States. How I Do It: Communicating to Patients and Families about Post Intensive Care Syndrome. Diagnostic Performance of the Modified Lung-RADS in a Tuberculosis-endemic Country: The Korean National Lung Cancer Screening Program. Prolonged mechanical ventilation in critically ill patients: six-month mortality, care pathways, and quality of life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1