Predicting visual outcomes in keratoprosthesis surgery with critical flicker fusion frequency, B-scan, visual electrophysiology and endoscopy.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY British Journal of Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1136/bjo-2024-325719
Guangcan Xu, Haolan Qi, Qianwei He, Mingxiong Chen, Junxia Fu, Qun Wang, Biyue Chen, Qing Hua Yang, Yifei Huang, Shihui Wei, Liqiang Wang
{"title":"Predicting visual outcomes in keratoprosthesis surgery with critical flicker fusion frequency, B-scan, visual electrophysiology and endoscopy.","authors":"Guangcan Xu, Haolan Qi, Qianwei He, Mingxiong Chen, Junxia Fu, Qun Wang, Biyue Chen, Qing Hua Yang, Yifei Huang, Shihui Wei, Liqiang Wang","doi":"10.1136/bjo-2024-325719","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluates the predictive power of the critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF) test for visual outcomes in keratoprosthesis (KPro) candidates, comparing its accuracy with B-scan ultrasound, flash visual evoked potentials (fVEP) and endoscopy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 42 patients (42 eyes) scheduled for KPro surgery with a median follow-up period of 6 months. The receiver operating characteristic curve identified the cut-off threshold for CFF in the model development study (17 eyes). All patients in the comparison study (25 eyes) underwent preoperative assessments including trichromatic CFF (red, green and yellow), B-scan ultrasound, fVEP and perioperative endoscopy. Results were classified as either favourable or unfavourable predictors of visual outcomes based on predefined criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of each assessment were calculated based on postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)≥20/200. The Bland-Altman test assessed the consistency between CFF-predicted BCVA and actual BCVA.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the trichromatic CFF tests, the yellow-CFF (yCFF) exhibited the highest area under the curve value of 0.97 and a cut-off threshold at 10 Hz for predicting postoperative BCVA≥20/200 (p<0.05). yCFF achieved 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity in predicting satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Endoscopy had 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, B-scan showed 70% sensitivity and 60% specificity, and fVEP had 75% sensitivity and 40% specificity. yCFF showed a mean bias of 0.091 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in postoperative prediction.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The CFF test provides robust visual function evaluation in KPro candidates. It demonstrates superior predictive accuracy for visual prognosis compared with routine ophthalmologic examinations, such as B-scan ultrasonography, fVEP and endoscopy.</p>","PeriodicalId":9313,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo-2024-325719","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study evaluates the predictive power of the critical flicker fusion frequency (CFF) test for visual outcomes in keratoprosthesis (KPro) candidates, comparing its accuracy with B-scan ultrasound, flash visual evoked potentials (fVEP) and endoscopy.

Methods: The study included 42 patients (42 eyes) scheduled for KPro surgery with a median follow-up period of 6 months. The receiver operating characteristic curve identified the cut-off threshold for CFF in the model development study (17 eyes). All patients in the comparison study (25 eyes) underwent preoperative assessments including trichromatic CFF (red, green and yellow), B-scan ultrasound, fVEP and perioperative endoscopy. Results were classified as either favourable or unfavourable predictors of visual outcomes based on predefined criteria. Sensitivity and specificity of each assessment were calculated based on postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)≥20/200. The Bland-Altman test assessed the consistency between CFF-predicted BCVA and actual BCVA.

Results: Among the trichromatic CFF tests, the yellow-CFF (yCFF) exhibited the highest area under the curve value of 0.97 and a cut-off threshold at 10 Hz for predicting postoperative BCVA≥20/200 (p<0.05). yCFF achieved 90% sensitivity and 80% specificity in predicting satisfactory postoperative outcomes. Endoscopy had 80% sensitivity and 80% specificity, B-scan showed 70% sensitivity and 60% specificity, and fVEP had 75% sensitivity and 40% specificity. yCFF showed a mean bias of 0.091 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) in postoperative prediction.

Conclusions: The CFF test provides robust visual function evaluation in KPro candidates. It demonstrates superior predictive accuracy for visual prognosis compared with routine ophthalmologic examinations, such as B-scan ultrasonography, fVEP and endoscopy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用临界闪烁融合频率、B-扫描、视觉电生理学和内窥镜检查预测角膜移植手术的视觉效果。
目的:本研究评估了临界闪烁融合频率(CFF)测试对角膜前列腺成形术(KPro)候选者视觉结果的预测能力,并将其准确性与B扫描超声波、闪光视觉诱发电位(fVEP)和内窥镜检查进行了比较:研究包括 42 名计划接受 KPro 手术的患者(42 只眼),中位随访时间为 6 个月。在模型开发研究(17 眼)中,接收器操作特征曲线确定了 CFF 的临界值。对比研究中的所有患者(25 眼)都接受了术前评估,包括三基色 CFF(红、绿、黄)、B 扫描超声波、fVEP 和围手术期内窥镜检查。根据预先确定的标准,评估结果被归类为对视觉结果有利或不利的预测因素。根据术后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)≥20/200计算每项评估的敏感性和特异性。Bland-Altman检验评估了CFF预测的BCVA与实际BCVA之间的一致性:结果:在三基色 CFF 测试中,黄色 CFF(yCFF)的曲线下面积值最高,为 0.97,预测术后 BCVA≥20/200 的临界值为 10 Hz(p 结论:CFF 测试提供了可靠的视觉功能:CFF 测试为 KPro 候选者提供了可靠的视觉功能评估。与 B-scan 超声波检查、fVEP 和内窥镜检查等常规眼科检查相比,它对视觉预后的预测准确性更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
213
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO) is an international peer-reviewed journal for ophthalmologists and visual science specialists. BJO publishes clinical investigations, clinical observations, and clinically relevant laboratory investigations related to ophthalmology. It also provides major reviews and also publishes manuscripts covering regional issues in a global context.
期刊最新文献
Impact of microorganism virulence on endophthalmitis outcomes Progressive inner retinal neurodegeneration in non-proliferative macular telangiectasia type 2 Effect of intravenous methylprednisolone on serum antibody levels in thyroid eye disease The aqueous humour dynamics in primary angle closure disease: a computational study Retinal curvature in Chinese children with myopia measured by ultra-widefield swept-source optical coherence tomography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1