{"title":"Tumor grade and progesterone receptor status in predicting benefit of chemotherapy in high genomic risk breast cancer.","authors":"Ke Liu, Gui-Ping Chen, Xue-Qin Chen, San-Gang Wu","doi":"10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (<i>p</i> < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (<i>p</i> < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (<i>p</i> = 0.010) and overall survival (<i>p</i> < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all <i>p</i> ≥ 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":12099,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737140.2024.2393749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy.
Research design and methods: Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database.
Result: We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (p < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (p < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.010) and overall survival (p < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all p ≥ 0.05).
Conclusion: Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Anticancer Therapy (ISSN 1473-7140) provides expert appraisal and commentary on the major trends in cancer care and highlights the performance of new therapeutic and diagnostic approaches.
Coverage includes tumor management, novel medicines, anticancer agents and chemotherapy, biological therapy, cancer vaccines, therapeutic indications, biomarkers and diagnostics, and treatment guidelines. All articles are subject to rigorous peer-review, and the journal makes an essential contribution to decision-making in cancer care.
Comprehensive coverage in each review is complemented by the unique Expert Review format and includes the following sections:
Expert Opinion - a personal view of the data presented in the article, a discussion on the developments that are likely to be important in the future, and the avenues of research likely to become exciting as further studies yield more detailed results
Article Highlights – an executive summary of the author’s most critical points.