Comparison of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Japanese nationwide database study.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY International Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-18 DOI:10.1007/s10147-024-02603-2
Hiroe Suzuki-Chiba, Takaaki Konishi, Shotaro Aso, Kanako Makito, Hiroki Matsui, Taisuke Jo, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga
{"title":"Comparison of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a Japanese nationwide database study.","authors":"Hiroe Suzuki-Chiba, Takaaki Konishi, Shotaro Aso, Kanako Makito, Hiroki Matsui, Taisuke Jo, Kiyohide Fushimi, Hideo Yasunaga","doi":"10.1007/s10147-024-02603-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Olanzapine is prescribed as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at a dose of 2.5 or 5 mg in Asian countries. We compared the effectiveness of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified patients who received olanzapine doses of 2.5 or 5 mg during high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer between January 2016 and March 2021. We conducted a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for various factors, including those affecting olanzapine metabolism. The outcomes were additional antiemetic drug administration (within 2-5 days after chemotherapy initiation), length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Olanzapine 2.5 and 5.0 mg were used in 2905 and 4287 patients, respectively. The propensity score-matched analysis showed that olanzapine 2.5 mg administration was significantly associated with a higher proportion of additional antiemetic drug administration (36% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) than olanzapine 5 mg. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days in both groups. Total hospitalization cost did not differ significantly between the two doses of olanzapine (5061 vs. 5160 USD, p = 0.07). The instrumental variable analysis demonstrated compatible results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prophylactic use of olanzapine 2.5 mg during chemotherapy for lung cancer was associated with a higher rate of additional antiemetic drugs than olanzapine 5 mg.</p>","PeriodicalId":13869,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1762-1773"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11511693/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10147-024-02603-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Olanzapine is prescribed as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at a dose of 2.5 or 5 mg in Asian countries. We compared the effectiveness of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer.

Methods: Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified patients who received olanzapine doses of 2.5 or 5 mg during high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer between January 2016 and March 2021. We conducted a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for various factors, including those affecting olanzapine metabolism. The outcomes were additional antiemetic drug administration (within 2-5 days after chemotherapy initiation), length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.

Results: Olanzapine 2.5 and 5.0 mg were used in 2905 and 4287 patients, respectively. The propensity score-matched analysis showed that olanzapine 2.5 mg administration was significantly associated with a higher proportion of additional antiemetic drug administration (36% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) than olanzapine 5 mg. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days in both groups. Total hospitalization cost did not differ significantly between the two doses of olanzapine (5061 vs. 5160 USD, p = 0.07). The instrumental variable analysis demonstrated compatible results.

Conclusion: Prophylactic use of olanzapine 2.5 mg during chemotherapy for lung cancer was associated with a higher rate of additional antiemetic drugs than olanzapine 5 mg.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较奥氮平 2.5 毫克和 5 毫克在预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的作用:一项日本全国性数据库研究。
背景:在亚洲国家,奥氮平是化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的预防性处方药,剂量为2.5或5毫克。我们比较了奥氮平 2.5 毫克和 5 毫克在预防肺癌高致瘤性化疗患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的效果:利用日本全国住院患者数据库,我们确定了2016年1月至2021年3月期间在肺癌高致瘤性化疗期间接受2.5毫克或5毫克剂量奥氮平治疗的患者。我们进行了 1:1 倾向评分匹配分析,并对各种因素(包括影响奥氮平代谢的因素)进行了调整。结果为额外的止吐药用药(化疗开始后 2-5 天内)、住院时间和住院总费用:分别有 2905 名和 4287 名患者使用了 2.5 毫克和 5.0 毫克的奥氮平。倾向得分匹配分析显示,使用奥氮平 2.5 毫克与额外使用止吐药的比例较高有显著相关性(36% 对 31%,P 结论:奥氮平 2.5 毫克和 5.0 毫克的预防性使用与额外使用止吐药的比例较高有显著相关性:肺癌化疗期间预防性使用奥氮平 2.5 毫克与额外服用止吐药的比例高于奥氮平 5 毫克有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
175
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Clinical Oncology (IJCO) welcomes original research papers on all aspects of clinical oncology that report the results of novel and timely investigations. Reports on clinical trials are encouraged. Experimental studies will also be accepted if they have obvious relevance to clinical oncology. Membership in the Japan Society of Clinical Oncology is not a prerequisite for submission to the journal. Papers are received on the understanding that: their contents have not been published in whole or in part elsewhere; that they are subject to peer review by at least two referees and the Editors, and to editorial revision of the language and contents; and that the Editors are responsible for their acceptance, rejection, and order of publication.
期刊最新文献
A prospective study comparing highly qualified Molecular Tumor Boards with AI-powered software as a medical device. Robotic dual-docking surgery for para-aortic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer: a prospective feasibility study. Prognostic significance of lymph node metastasis of soft tissue sarcoma of the extremities. National cancer institute experience. Efficacy of androgen receptor signaling inhibitors in combination with androgen deprivation therapy for castration-sensitive metastatic prostate cancer: a retrospective analysis in a Japanese cohort. Postoperative adjuvant therapy with molecularly targeted agents for non-small cell lung cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1