{"title":"Efficacy of CalliSpheres<sup>®</sup> drug-loaded microspheres combined with doxorubicin in hepatocellular carcinoma.","authors":"Boxun Jin, Yanmei Gu, Shuangmei Xi, Xin Liu, Xiulian Wu, Xin Wang, Guangming Li","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2390025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study compared the efficacy and safety of the transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres<sup>®</sup> drug-eluting beads loading with doxorubicin (DEB-TACE) versus conventional lipiodol (cTACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 144 patients, who were randomly assigned to receive either DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres<sup>®</sup> microspheres or cTACE with doxorubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Patients were followed up for 12 months, with assessments at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate (CR), and the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety profile of the two treatments.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that DEB-TACE was superior to cTACE in terms of CR (50.0% vs 30.6% at 3 months, <i>p</i> = 0.03; 43.1% vs 25.0% at 12 months, <i>p</i> = 0.04), OS (18.2 months vs 14.6 months, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and PFS (7.4 months vs 4.8 months, <i>p</i> < 0.05), and that the safety profile of the two treatments was similar (<i>p</i> > 0.05 for all comparisons). However, the efficacy of DEB-TACE and cTACE varied according to the tumor morphology. DEB-TACE showed better CR rates in patients with nodular tumors, while no significant difference in CR between the two groups in patients with infiltrative tumors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>DEB-TACE showed superior efficacy to cTACE in terms of CR, OS, and PFS, particularly in patients with nodular tumors, while maintaining a similar safety profile. These findings suggest that tumor morphology could inform treatment decisions for TACE in HCC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1087-1092"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2390025","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study compared the efficacy and safety of the transarterial chemoembolization with CalliSpheres® drug-eluting beads loading with doxorubicin (DEB-TACE) versus conventional lipiodol (cTACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted with 144 patients, who were randomly assigned to receive either DEB-TACE with doxorubicin-loaded CalliSpheres® microspheres or cTACE with doxorubicin-lipiodol emulsion. Patients were followed up for 12 months, with assessments at 3 and 12 months posttreatment. The primary endpoint was the clinical response rate (CR), and the secondary endpoints were the overall survival (OS), the progression-free survival (PFS), and the safety profile of the two treatments.
Results: The results showed that DEB-TACE was superior to cTACE in terms of CR (50.0% vs 30.6% at 3 months, p = 0.03; 43.1% vs 25.0% at 12 months, p = 0.04), OS (18.2 months vs 14.6 months, p < 0.05), and PFS (7.4 months vs 4.8 months, p < 0.05), and that the safety profile of the two treatments was similar (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). However, the efficacy of DEB-TACE and cTACE varied according to the tumor morphology. DEB-TACE showed better CR rates in patients with nodular tumors, while no significant difference in CR between the two groups in patients with infiltrative tumors.
Conclusion: DEB-TACE showed superior efficacy to cTACE in terms of CR, OS, and PFS, particularly in patients with nodular tumors, while maintaining a similar safety profile. These findings suggest that tumor morphology could inform treatment decisions for TACE in HCC patients.
研究目的本研究比较了在无法切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中使用装载多柔比星的CalliSpheres®药物洗脱珠经动脉化疗栓塞术(DEB-TACE)与传统脂肪碘化术(cTACE)的疗效和安全性:对144名患者进行了随机对照试验(RCT),随机分配患者接受装载多柔比星的CalliSpheres®微球的DEB-TACE或装载多柔比星-利碘乳剂的cTACE。对患者进行为期12个月的随访,并在治疗后3个月和12个月进行评估。主要终点是临床反应率(CR),次要终点是总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)以及两种疗法的安全性:结果显示,DEB-TACE在CR(3个月时为50.0% vs 30.6%,P = 0.03;12个月时为43.1% vs 25.0%,P = 0.04)、OS(18.2个月 vs 14.6个月,所有比较中P P > 0.05)方面均优于cTACE。然而,DEB-TACE和cTACE的疗效因肿瘤形态而异。在结节性肿瘤患者中,DEB-TACE的CR率更高,而在浸润性肿瘤患者中,两组的CR无明显差异:结论:DEB-TACE在CR、OS和PFS方面的疗效优于cTACE,尤其是在结节性肿瘤患者中,同时保持了相似的安全性。这些研究结果表明,肿瘤形态可为HCC患者的TACE治疗决策提供依据。
期刊介绍:
The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution