Is Visual Reliance Increased in Athletes After ACL Injury? A Scoping Review.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1007/s40279-024-02085-2
Emanuele Tortoli, Alli Gokeler, Igor Tak, Leonardo Pellicciari, Grant Norte
{"title":"Is Visual Reliance Increased in Athletes After ACL Injury? A Scoping Review.","authors":"Emanuele Tortoli, Alli Gokeler, Igor Tak, Leonardo Pellicciari, Grant Norte","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02085-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury often exhibit visual cognitive deficits during tasks that require neuromuscular control. In this paper, we present evidence of increased visual reliance after ACL injury during a range of clinically applicable cognitive-motor tasks. This information is essential to strengthen the scientific rationale for therapeutic interventions that target maladaptive neuroplasticity and may translate to improved return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes following ACL injury.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objectives of this study are (1) to determine if visual reliance is present during common rehabilitation-based assessments after ACL deficiency (ACL-D) or ACL reconstruction (ACL-R), (2) to describe how visual reliance is assessed during such tasks, and (3) to provide information to help clinicians and patients understand the clinical relevance of cognitive load in the assessment and intervention of visual reliance.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Scoping review.</p><p><strong>Literature search: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PEDro databases.</p><p><strong>Study selection criteria: </strong>Only primary studies published in English were included without time limitations.</p><p><strong>Data synthesis: </strong>Qualitative analysis of the included studies was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We synthesized the results of 23 studies. A total of 7 studies (31%) included patients with ACL-D, 15 studies (65%) included patients with ACL-R, and 1 study (4%) included patients with ACL-D and ACL-R. Evaluation of tasks, task evaluation setting, visual conditions, outcome measures, and presence of increased visual reliance were identified. Most studies investigating patients with ACL-D, contrary to those with ACL-R, exhibited worse postural stability during eyes-closed conditions than uninjured controls. Complete visual obstruction (i.e., eyes closed or blindfolded) was the most frequently reported method to disrupt vision (52%). The addition of a visual-cognitive challenge resulted in significantly worse postural stability in patients with ACL-R compared with controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Visual reliance was most commonly assessed during single leg stance with complete visual obstruction. The majority of studies on patients with ACL-D indicate that they exhibit poorer postural stability in eyes-closed conditions when compared with uninjured controls, which suggests increased visual reliance. There is less evidence of visual reliance in patients who have undergone ACL-R compared with those with ACL-D. Adding a visual-cognitive load was found to be more effective in inducing postural stability deficits in individuals who have undergone ACL-R.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>IV. The protocol was a priori registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/p4j95/ ).</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2531-2556"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02085-2","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Individuals with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury often exhibit visual cognitive deficits during tasks that require neuromuscular control. In this paper, we present evidence of increased visual reliance after ACL injury during a range of clinically applicable cognitive-motor tasks. This information is essential to strengthen the scientific rationale for therapeutic interventions that target maladaptive neuroplasticity and may translate to improved return-to-sport (RTS) outcomes following ACL injury.

Objectives: The objectives of this study are (1) to determine if visual reliance is present during common rehabilitation-based assessments after ACL deficiency (ACL-D) or ACL reconstruction (ACL-R), (2) to describe how visual reliance is assessed during such tasks, and (3) to provide information to help clinicians and patients understand the clinical relevance of cognitive load in the assessment and intervention of visual reliance.

Design: Scoping review.

Literature search: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, SCOPUS, and PEDro databases.

Study selection criteria: Only primary studies published in English were included without time limitations.

Data synthesis: Qualitative analysis of the included studies was performed.

Results: We synthesized the results of 23 studies. A total of 7 studies (31%) included patients with ACL-D, 15 studies (65%) included patients with ACL-R, and 1 study (4%) included patients with ACL-D and ACL-R. Evaluation of tasks, task evaluation setting, visual conditions, outcome measures, and presence of increased visual reliance were identified. Most studies investigating patients with ACL-D, contrary to those with ACL-R, exhibited worse postural stability during eyes-closed conditions than uninjured controls. Complete visual obstruction (i.e., eyes closed or blindfolded) was the most frequently reported method to disrupt vision (52%). The addition of a visual-cognitive challenge resulted in significantly worse postural stability in patients with ACL-R compared with controls.

Conclusions: Visual reliance was most commonly assessed during single leg stance with complete visual obstruction. The majority of studies on patients with ACL-D indicate that they exhibit poorer postural stability in eyes-closed conditions when compared with uninjured controls, which suggests increased visual reliance. There is less evidence of visual reliance in patients who have undergone ACL-R compared with those with ACL-D. Adding a visual-cognitive load was found to be more effective in inducing postural stability deficits in individuals who have undergone ACL-R.

Level of evidence: IV. The protocol was a priori registered on Open Science Framework ( https://osf.io/p4j95/ ).

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
前交叉韧带损伤后运动员对视觉的依赖是否增加?范围审查。
背景:前十字韧带(ACL)损伤患者在完成需要神经肌肉控制的任务时,通常会表现出视觉认知障碍。在本文中,我们提出了前交叉韧带损伤后在一系列临床适用的认知-运动任务中视觉依赖性增强的证据。这些信息对于加强针对适应不良的神经可塑性的治疗干预的科学依据至关重要,并可改善前交叉韧带损伤后重返运动场(RTS)的结果:本研究的目的是:(1)确定在前交叉韧带缺损(ACL-D)或前交叉韧带重建(ACL-R)后的常见康复评估中是否存在视觉依赖;(2)描述在此类任务中如何评估视觉依赖;(3)提供信息,帮助临床医生和患者了解认知负荷在评估和干预视觉依赖中的临床意义:文献检索:我们检索了 MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL、SCOPUS 和 PEDro 数据库:数据综合:数据综合:对纳入的研究进行定性分析:结果:我们综合了 23 项研究的结果。共有 7 项研究(31%)纳入了 ACL-D 患者,15 项研究(65%)纳入了 ACL-R 患者,1 项研究(4%)纳入了 ACL-D 和 ACL-R 患者。研究确定了任务评估、任务评估设置、视觉条件、结果测量以及是否存在视觉依赖性增强的情况。与前交叉韧带损伤(ACL-R)患者相反,大多数研究调查的前交叉韧带损伤(ACL-D)患者在闭眼状态下的姿势稳定性比未受伤的对照组差。完全视觉障碍(即闭眼或蒙眼)是最常见的干扰视觉的方法(52%)。与对照组相比,增加视觉认知挑战会导致 ACL-R 患者的姿势稳定性明显降低:结论:视觉依赖性最常在单腿站立和完全视觉障碍时进行评估。大多数关于 ACL-D 患者的研究表明,与未受伤的对照组相比,他们在闭眼状态下的姿势稳定性较差,这表明视觉依赖性增加。与 ACL-D 患者相比,接受 ACL-R 治疗的患者视觉依赖性较低。研究发现,增加视觉认知负荷能更有效地诱导 ACL-R 患者出现姿势稳定性缺陷:证据等级:IV。该研究方案已事先在开放科学框架(https://osf.io/p4j95/ )上注册。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
期刊最新文献
Relationship Between Physical Literacy and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Guiding Evidence-Based Classification in Para Sporting Populations: A Systematic Review of Impairment Measures and Activity Limitations The Influence of Kinesiophobia on Time to Clinical Recovery in Collegiate Athletes with Concussion Acknowledgement to Referees and the Editorial Board. Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) Spectroscopy as a Tool to Characterize Exercise and Physical Activity: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1