The Effects of Multifaceted Introversion and Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Solitude-Seeking Behavior.

IF 5 1区 心理学 Q1 Psychology Journal of Personality Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1111/jopy.12970
Virginia Thomas, Paul A Nelson
{"title":"The Effects of Multifaceted Introversion and Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Solitude-Seeking Behavior.","authors":"Virginia Thomas, Paul A Nelson","doi":"10.1111/jopy.12970","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The state of solitude may be desirable and beneficial particularly for individuals who are highly sensitive and introverted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To test these predictions, we surveyed a nationally representative US sample of 301 adults and a sample of 99 undergraduates on their levels of sensory processing sensitivity and assessed introversion with the Big Five Inventory and the multifaceted STAR Introversion Scale. Participants then reported the frequency and duration of their volitional solitude, stress levels, and subjective well-being across 10 consecutive days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Results revealed that Social Introversion and sensitivity significantly predicted higher motivations for solitude, both self-determined and not. Thinking Introversion also predicted higher self-determined solitude, but BFI introversion showed no relationship with either motivation. Social Introversion and sensitivity predicted higher frequency of solitude in daily life and longer duration of solitary episodes; BFI Introversion and Restrained Introversion showed the opposite pattern for both outcomes. Finally, stress was positively associated with daily solitude frequency, and in turn, solitude frequency was negatively associated with same-day well-being; there were no interaction effects with personality traits.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>These findings suggest that introversion, as measured by the STAR Introversion Scale, and sensitivity contribute significantly to solitary motivation; however, solitude appears to be sought after by people in times of stress regardless of their scores on these traits.</p>","PeriodicalId":48421,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Personality","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Personality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12970","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Psychology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The state of solitude may be desirable and beneficial particularly for individuals who are highly sensitive and introverted.

Methods: To test these predictions, we surveyed a nationally representative US sample of 301 adults and a sample of 99 undergraduates on their levels of sensory processing sensitivity and assessed introversion with the Big Five Inventory and the multifaceted STAR Introversion Scale. Participants then reported the frequency and duration of their volitional solitude, stress levels, and subjective well-being across 10 consecutive days.

Results: Results revealed that Social Introversion and sensitivity significantly predicted higher motivations for solitude, both self-determined and not. Thinking Introversion also predicted higher self-determined solitude, but BFI introversion showed no relationship with either motivation. Social Introversion and sensitivity predicted higher frequency of solitude in daily life and longer duration of solitary episodes; BFI Introversion and Restrained Introversion showed the opposite pattern for both outcomes. Finally, stress was positively associated with daily solitude frequency, and in turn, solitude frequency was negatively associated with same-day well-being; there were no interaction effects with personality traits.

Discussion: These findings suggest that introversion, as measured by the STAR Introversion Scale, and sensitivity contribute significantly to solitary motivation; however, solitude appears to be sought after by people in times of stress regardless of their scores on these traits.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多方面内向性和感觉处理敏感性对寻求独处行为的影响
引言独处的状态可能是令人向往和有益的,尤其是对于那些高度敏感和内向的人来说:为了验证这些预测,我们调查了具有全国代表性的美国 301 名成人样本和 99 名大学生样本的感觉处理敏感度水平,并使用 "大五量表 "和多元 STAR 内向量表对内向性进行了评估。然后,参与者报告了连续 10 天内自愿独处的频率和持续时间、压力水平和主观幸福感:结果显示,社会内向性和敏感性明显预示着更高的独处动机,包括自我决定的和非自我决定的。思维内向也预示着更高的自我决定的独处,但 BFI 内向与这两种动机都没有关系。社会内向性和敏感性预示着在日常生活中独处的频率更高,独处的时间更长;BFI 内向性和克制内向性在这两个结果上显示出相反的模式。最后,压力与每日独处频率呈正相关,反过来,独处频率与当日幸福感呈负相关;与人格特质之间没有交互效应:这些研究结果表明,STAR 内向量表所测量的内向性和敏感性对独处动机有很大的影响;然而,无论人们在这些特质上的得分如何,在有压力的时候似乎都会寻求独处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Personality
Journal of Personality PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL-
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
6.00%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: Journal of Personality publishes scientific investigations in the field of personality. It focuses particularly on personality and behavior dynamics, personality development, and individual differences in the cognitive, affective, and interpersonal domains. The journal reflects and stimulates interest in the growth of new theoretical and methodological approaches in personality psychology.
期刊最新文献
Constructing the "Family Personality": Can Family Functioning Be Linked to Parent-Child Interpersonal Neural Synchronization? Neuroticism is Associated With Greater Affective Variability at High Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being, but With Lower Affective Variability at Low Levels of Momentary Affective Well-Being. Issue Information The Connection Between Dark Traits and Emotional Intelligence: A Multistudy Person-Centered Approach. The Effects of Multifaceted Introversion and Sensory Processing Sensitivity on Solitude-Seeking Behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1