Psychological Distress and the Needs of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients in Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 EMERGENCY MEDICINE Journal of Emergency Nursing Pub Date : 2024-08-17 DOI:10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.005
Li-Rong Wu, Jun-Yu Fan, Tse-Hsuan Su, Chin-Yen Han
{"title":"Psychological Distress and the Needs of Family Members of Critically Ill Patients in Emergency Departments During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Li-Rong Wu, Jun-Yu Fan, Tse-Hsuan Su, Chin-Yen Han","doi":"10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The literature highlights the importance of the needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments. Understanding these needs helps to alleviate psychological distress and contribute to the patients' recoveries. This study aimed to examine the psychological distress and needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional design was used to collect data using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21, the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory for the Emergency Department, and the Needs Met Inventory questionnaire from a convenience sample of 170 family members of critical patients. Descriptive analysis and importance-performance analysis were applied to analyze the data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results showed that 52.4% of family members reported mild to extremely severe levels of depression, 60% reported mild to extremely severe levels of anxiety, and 53.5% had mild to extremely severe levels of stress. Anxiety showed a significant negative correlation with comfort needs (r = -0.17) and support needs being met (r = -0.16). The importance-performance analysis showed that the coordinates for support needs were in quadrant IV, signifying a higher level of importance perceived by family members but a lower level of the needs being met.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Providing the assessment and necessary support to alleviate psychological distress will help enhance the ability of the emergency department to meet families' needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jen.2024.07.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The literature highlights the importance of the needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments. Understanding these needs helps to alleviate psychological distress and contribute to the patients' recoveries. This study aimed to examine the psychological distress and needs of family members of critical patients in emergency departments.

Methods: A cross-sectional design was used to collect data using the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale-21, the Critical Care Family Needs Inventory for the Emergency Department, and the Needs Met Inventory questionnaire from a convenience sample of 170 family members of critical patients. Descriptive analysis and importance-performance analysis were applied to analyze the data.

Results: The results showed that 52.4% of family members reported mild to extremely severe levels of depression, 60% reported mild to extremely severe levels of anxiety, and 53.5% had mild to extremely severe levels of stress. Anxiety showed a significant negative correlation with comfort needs (r = -0.17) and support needs being met (r = -0.16). The importance-performance analysis showed that the coordinates for support needs were in quadrant IV, signifying a higher level of importance perceived by family members but a lower level of the needs being met.

Conclusion: Providing the assessment and necessary support to alleviate psychological distress will help enhance the ability of the emergency department to meet families' needs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 大流行期间急诊科重症患者家属的心理压力和需求:一项横断面研究
导言:文献强调了急诊科危重病人家属需求的重要性。了解这些需求有助于减轻患者的心理压力,促进患者康复。本研究旨在探讨急诊科危重病人家属的心理困扰和需求:方法:采用横断面设计,使用抑郁、焦虑和压力量表-21、急诊科危重病人家属需求量表和需求满足量表问卷收集数据,样本为 170 名危重病人家属。数据分析采用了描述性分析和重要性表现分析:结果显示,52.4%的家属有轻度到极重度抑郁,60%的家属有轻度到极重度焦虑,53.5%的家属有轻度到极重度压力。焦虑与舒适需求(r = -0.17)和支持需求得到满足(r = -0.16)呈显著负相关。重要性-绩效分析表明,支持需求的坐标位于第四象限,表明家庭成员认为其重要性较高,但需求得到满足的程度较低:结论:提供评估和必要的支持以缓解心理压力,将有助于提高急诊科满足家属需求的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
11.80%
发文量
132
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Emergency Nursing, the official journal of the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA), is committed to the dissemination of high quality, peer-reviewed manuscripts relevant to all areas of emergency nursing practice across the lifespan. Journal content includes clinical topics, integrative or systematic literature reviews, research, and practice improvement initiatives that provide emergency nurses globally with implications for translation of new knowledge into practice. The Journal also includes focused sections such as case studies, pharmacology/toxicology, injury prevention, trauma, triage, quality and safety, pediatrics and geriatrics. The Journal aims to mirror the goal of ENA to promote: community, governance and leadership, knowledge, quality and safety, and advocacy.
期刊最新文献
Comparative Analysis of Frailty Scales in Emergency Department: Highlighting the Strengths of the Triage Frailty and Comorbidity Tool. An Analysis of Psychological Capital and Influencing Factors Among Disaster Care Reservists. Uncovering the Driving Forces of Emergency Nurses' Retention: Findings From a Grounded Theory Study. Emergency Management and Nursing Considerations of Carotid Blowout Syndrome. An Introduction to the Semantics and Statistics Behind the Firearm Policy Debates.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1