Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Competency in Education: Performance of ChatGPT-4 in the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) Radiography Certification Exam

IF 3.8 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.009
Yousif Al-Naser MRT(R) , Felobater Halka , Boris Ng BEng , Dwight Mountford MRT(R) MSc , Sonali Sharma , Ken Niure MRT(R) , Charlotte Yong-Hing MD , Faisal Khosa MD , Christian Van der Pol MD
{"title":"Evaluating Artificial Intelligence Competency in Education: Performance of ChatGPT-4 in the American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) Radiography Certification Exam","authors":"Yousif Al-Naser MRT(R) ,&nbsp;Felobater Halka ,&nbsp;Boris Ng BEng ,&nbsp;Dwight Mountford MRT(R) MSc ,&nbsp;Sonali Sharma ,&nbsp;Ken Niure MRT(R) ,&nbsp;Charlotte Yong-Hing MD ,&nbsp;Faisal Khosa MD ,&nbsp;Christian Van der Pol MD","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2024.08.009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) leads the certification process with an exam comprising 200 multiple-choice questions. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT-4's performance in responding to practice questions similar to those found in the ARRT board examination.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>We used a dataset of 200 practice multiple-choice questions for the ARRT certification exam from BoardVitals. Each question was fed to ChatGPT-4 fifteen times, resulting in 3000 observations to account for response variability.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>ChatGPT's overall performance was 80.56%, with higher accuracy on text-based questions (86.3%) compared to image-based questions (45.6%). Response times were longer for image-based questions (18.01 s) than for text-based questions (13.27 s). Performance varied by domain: 72.6% for Safety, 70.6% for Image Production, 67.3% for Patient Care, and 53.4% for Procedures. As anticipated, performance was best on on easy questions (78.5%).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ChatGPT demonstrated effective performance on the BoardVitals question bank for ARRT certification. Future studies could benefit from analyzing the correlation between BoardVitals scores and actual exam outcomes. Further development in AI, particularly in image processing and interpretation, is necessary to enhance its utility in educational settings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 2","pages":"Pages 597-603"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633224005725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

The American Registry of Radiologic Technologists (ARRT) leads the certification process with an exam comprising 200 multiple-choice questions. This study aims to evaluate ChatGPT-4's performance in responding to practice questions similar to those found in the ARRT board examination.

Materials and Methods

We used a dataset of 200 practice multiple-choice questions for the ARRT certification exam from BoardVitals. Each question was fed to ChatGPT-4 fifteen times, resulting in 3000 observations to account for response variability.

Results

ChatGPT's overall performance was 80.56%, with higher accuracy on text-based questions (86.3%) compared to image-based questions (45.6%). Response times were longer for image-based questions (18.01 s) than for text-based questions (13.27 s). Performance varied by domain: 72.6% for Safety, 70.6% for Image Production, 67.3% for Patient Care, and 53.4% for Procedures. As anticipated, performance was best on on easy questions (78.5%).

Conclusion

ChatGPT demonstrated effective performance on the BoardVitals question bank for ARRT certification. Future studies could benefit from analyzing the correlation between BoardVitals scores and actual exam outcomes. Further development in AI, particularly in image processing and interpretation, is necessary to enhance its utility in educational settings.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估人工智能在教育方面的能力:ChatGPT-4 在美国放射技师注册机构 (ARRT) 放射学认证考试中的表现。
理由和目标:美国放射技师注册委员会 (ARRT) 主导认证程序,考试包括 200 道选择题。本研究旨在评估 ChatGPT-4 在回答与 ARRT 委员会考试类似的练习题时的表现:我们使用了 BoardVitals 提供的 200 道 ARRT 认证考试练习选择题数据集。每道题都向 ChatGPT-4 发送了 15 次,共观察了 3000 次,以考虑反应的可变性:ChatGPT 的总体性能为 80.56%,其中文本问题(86.3%)的准确率高于图像问题(45.6%)。图像问题的回复时间(18.01 秒)比文本问题的回复时间(13.27 秒)长。不同领域的成绩各不相同:安全 72.6%,图像制作 70.6%,病人护理 67.3%,程序 53.4%。正如预期的那样,简单问题的成绩最好(78.5%):ChatGPT 在 ARRT 认证的 BoardVitals 题库中表现出色。分析 BoardVitals 分数与实际考试结果之间的相关性将有助于今后的研究。有必要进一步发展人工智能,尤其是在图像处理和解读方面,以提高其在教育环境中的实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
CT-Based Deep Learning Predicts Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy. Diagnostic Radiology Residency: A Closer Look at Its Rising Popularity. Accelerated Multi-b-Value DWI Using Deep Learning Reconstruction: Image Quality Improvement and Microvascular Invasion Prediction in BCLC Stage A Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Acute Moderate Hemodynamic Stroke Secondary to Large Vessel Stenosis: A Case Series Exploring Imaging Characteristics and Endovascular Treatment Outcomes. Harnessing Multi-Omics: Integrating Radiomics and Pathomics for Predicting Microsatellite Instability in Rectal Cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1