CT-Based Deep Learning Predicts Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Academic Radiology Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-02-15 DOI:10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.046
Xiaoyu Huang , Yong Huang , Ping Li , Kai Xu
{"title":"CT-Based Deep Learning Predicts Prognosis in Esophageal Squamous Cell Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy Combined with Chemotherapy","authors":"Xiaoyu Huang ,&nbsp;Yong Huang ,&nbsp;Ping Li ,&nbsp;Kai Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.acra.2025.01.046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Rationale and Objectives</h3><div>Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has improved outcomes for some esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, but accurate pre-treatment risk stratification remains a critical gap. This study constructed a deep learning (DL) model to predict survival outcomes in ESCC patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and Methods</h3><div>A DL model was developed to predict survival outcomes in ESCC patients receiving immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Retrospective data from 482 patients across three institutions were split into training (<em>N<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->322), internal test (<em>N<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->79), and external test (<em>N<!--> </em>=<!--> <!-->81) sets. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were processed to analyze tumor and peritumoral regions. The model evaluated multiple input configurations: original tumor regions of interest (ROIs), ROI subregions, and ROIs expanded by 1 and 3 pixels. Performance was assessed using Harrell’s C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A multimodal model combined DL-derived risk scores with five key clinical and laboratory features. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method elucidated the contribution of individual features to model predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The DL model with 1-pixel peritumoral expansion achieved the best accuracy, yielding a C-index of 0.75 for the internal test set and 0.60 for the external test set. Hazard ratios for high-risk patients were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.19–2.46; P<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.02) in internal test set. The multimodal model achieved C-indices of 0.74 and 0.61 for internal and external test sets, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significant survival differences between high- and low-risk groups (P<!--> <!-->&lt;0.05). SHAP analysis identified tumor response, risk score, and age as critical contributors to predictions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This DL model demonstrates efficacy in stratifying ESCC patients by survival risk, particularly when integrating peritumoral imaging and clinical features. The model could serve as a valuable pre-treatment tool to facilitate the implementation of personalized treatment strategies for ESCC patients undergoing immunotherapy and chemotherapy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50928,"journal":{"name":"Academic Radiology","volume":"32 6","pages":"Pages 3397-3409"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1076633225001011","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale and Objectives

Immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has improved outcomes for some esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients, but accurate pre-treatment risk stratification remains a critical gap. This study constructed a deep learning (DL) model to predict survival outcomes in ESCC patients receiving immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy.

Materials and Methods

A DL model was developed to predict survival outcomes in ESCC patients receiving immunotherapy and chemotherapy. Retrospective data from 482 patients across three institutions were split into training (N = 322), internal test (N = 79), and external test (N = 81) sets. Unenhanced computed tomography (CT) scans were processed to analyze tumor and peritumoral regions. The model evaluated multiple input configurations: original tumor regions of interest (ROIs), ROI subregions, and ROIs expanded by 1 and 3 pixels. Performance was assessed using Harrell’s C-index and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. A multimodal model combined DL-derived risk scores with five key clinical and laboratory features. The Shapley Additive Explanations (SHAP) method elucidated the contribution of individual features to model predictions.

Results

The DL model with 1-pixel peritumoral expansion achieved the best accuracy, yielding a C-index of 0.75 for the internal test set and 0.60 for the external test set. Hazard ratios for high-risk patients were 1.82 (95% CI: 1.19–2.46; P = 0.02) in internal test set. The multimodal model achieved C-indices of 0.74 and 0.61 for internal and external test sets, respectively. Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed significant survival differences between high- and low-risk groups (P <0.05). SHAP analysis identified tumor response, risk score, and age as critical contributors to predictions.

Conclusion

This DL model demonstrates efficacy in stratifying ESCC patients by survival risk, particularly when integrating peritumoral imaging and clinical features. The model could serve as a valuable pre-treatment tool to facilitate the implementation of personalized treatment strategies for ESCC patients undergoing immunotherapy and chemotherapy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ct的深度学习预测免疫联合化疗食管癌患者的预后。
理由和目的:免疫治疗联合化疗改善了一些食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)患者的预后,但准确的治疗前风险分层仍然是一个关键的差距。本研究构建了一个深度学习(DL)模型来预测ESCC患者接受免疫治疗联合化疗的生存结果。材料和方法:建立DL模型预测ESCC患者接受免疫治疗和化疗的生存结果。来自三个机构的482例患者的回顾性数据被分为训练组(N=322)、内部测试组(N=79)和外部测试组(N=81)。处理非增强计算机断层扫描(CT)以分析肿瘤和肿瘤周围区域。该模型评估了多种输入配置:原始肿瘤感兴趣区域(ROI)、ROI子区域和扩展1和3个像素的ROI。采用Harrell’s c -指数和受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线进行评估。一个多模式模型将dl衍生的风险评分与五个关键的临床和实验室特征结合起来。Shapley加性解释(SHAP)方法阐明了个体特征对模型预测的贡献。结果:1像素肿瘤周围扩张的DL模型获得了最好的准确性,内部测试集的c指数为0.75,外部测试集的c指数为0.60。高危患者的风险比为1.82 (95% CI: 1.19-2.46;P=0.02)。多模态模型在内部和外部测试集上的c指数分别为0.74和0.61。Kaplan-Meier分析显示,高风险组和低风险组之间存在显著的生存差异(结论:该DL模型在根据生存风险对ESCC患者进行分层方面具有有效性,特别是在整合肿瘤周围影像学和临床特征时。该模型可作为一种有价值的治疗前工具,促进ESCC患者进行免疫治疗和化疗的个性化治疗策略的实施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Radiology
Academic Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
432
审稿时长
18 days
期刊介绍: Academic Radiology publishes original reports of clinical and laboratory investigations in diagnostic imaging, the diagnostic use of radioactive isotopes, computed tomography, positron emission tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, digital subtraction angiography, image-guided interventions and related techniques. It also includes brief technical reports describing original observations, techniques, and instrumental developments; state-of-the-art reports on clinical issues, new technology and other topics of current medical importance; meta-analyses; scientific studies and opinions on radiologic education; and letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
A Multicenter Study on Deep Learning Model-Assisted Detection of Brain Metastases in MR Images. Percutaneous Endobiliary Radiofrequency Ablation (PERFA) for Unresectable Cholangiocarcinoma. Predicting the Postoperative Recurrence Risk in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas of the Extremities and Trunk Using MRI-Based Nomogram. Predictive Performance of VBQ Scores and Hounsfield Units for Subsequent Fractures After Vertebral Augmentation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Efficacy of Thermal Ablation vs. Surgical Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Based on Multiparametric EOB-MRI Features: A Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1